Cited by 46Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

‘Don't take a poo!': Worker misbehaviour in on‐demand ride‐hail carpooling

Open access
Reid‐Musson, Emily, MacEachen, Ellen, Bartel, Emma·2020·New Technology, Work and Employment

Abstract

Workers actively negotiate contradictions between discourses of flexibility and entrepreneurialism and actually existing conditions of risk and precarity endemic to online self‐employed work. This article examines how ride‐hail drivers counter‐branded UberPool—a carpool ride‐hail service—as ‘UberPoo’. While marketed as a solution to congestion, UberPool created risky and coercive working conditions for ride‐hail drivers. Our analysis is from a study on ride‐hail driver experiences of health and safety risks in a large Canadian city. We engage the concept of organisational misbehaviour to explore how drivers mocked and avoided carpool rides despite the threat of penalties. We characterise misbehaviour as a struggle over lack of control and lack of autonomy in self‐employed work, providing evidence that despite their structural powerlessness, some ride‐hail drivers do set limits around the work they are willing to accept. Algorithmic management and ambiguously classified ride‐hail work are thus subject to some degree of subversion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ntwe.12159

Cites

19 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Huws, U. (2014), Labour in the global digital economy: The cybertariat comes of age. (New York, NY: Monthly Review Press).
  2. Jamil, R. (2017). Drivers Vs Uber -The limits of the Judicialization: Critical review of London's employ- ment tribunal verdict in the case of Aaslam Y. & Farrar J. against Uber. Revue Interventions Économiques/Papers in Political Economy, (58).
  3. Krisher, T. (2018, February 21). To get a ride with its new "Express Pool", Uber says take a walk. Toronto Star, pp. 1-5. Toronto. Retrieved from https ://www.thest ar.com/busin ess/tech_ news/2018/02/21/to-get-a-ride-with-its-new-expre ss-pool-uber-says-take-a-walk.html
  4. Srnicek, N. (2017), Platform capitalism. (Malden: Polity Press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reid‐Musson, E., MacEachen, E., & Bartel, E.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Reid‐Musson, Emily
Venue
New Technology, Work and Employment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
145-161
ISSN
  • 0268-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-005X
OpenAlex
W3007010853
Cited by
46
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
New Technology Work and Employment (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
carpooling, self-employment, algorithmic management, employee autonomy, precarity, health and safety risks, gig work, work flexibility, employee resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review