The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 204 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The neuroethology of friendship
Open accessAbstract
Friendship pervades the human social landscape. These bonds are so important that disrupting them leads to health problems, and difficulties forming or maintaining friendships attend neuropsychiatric disorders like autism and depression. Other animals also have friends, suggesting that friendship is not solely a human invention but is instead an evolved trait. A neuroethological approach applies behavioral, neurobiological, and molecular techniques to explain friendship with reference to its underlying mechanisms, development, evolutionary origins, and biological function. Recent studies implicate a shared suite of neural circuits and neuromodulatory pathways in the formation, maintenance, and manipulation of friendships across humans and other animals. Health consequences and reproductive advantages in mammals additionally suggest that friendship has adaptive benefits. We argue that understanding the neuroethology of friendship in humans and other animals brings us closer to knowing fully what it means to be human.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It may be that oxytocin released during interactions with bond partners enhances the social memory of those interactions (see Choleris et al., 2009; Ross and Young, 2009; Brent et al., 2013 for reviews), reinforcing partner-specific preferences.”
From Endogenous peripheral oxytocin measures can give insight into the dynamics of social relationships: a review (2014) · cites this paper as Brent et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–204 of 204
Yokoyama, C., Kawasaki, A., Hayashi, T., & Onoe, H. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs196 · Cited by 19
The Effects of Total Social Isolation Rearing on Behavior of Rhesus and Pigtail Macaques
Sackett, G. P., Holm, R. A., Ruppenthal, G. C., et al. (1976) · Advances in behavioral biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3081-3_5 · Cited by 12
Kinship and Behavior in Primates
Kaplan, J. R. (2006) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2006.108.3.572 · Cited by 6
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1998)6:5
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Anterior Cingulate Gyrus and Social Cognition: Tracking the Motivation of Others
Apps, M. A. J., Rushworth, M. F. S., & Chang, S. W. C. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.018 · Cited by 559
Self-citationFriendships and family support reduce subsequent depressive symptoms in at‐risk adolescents
van Harmelen, A.-L., Gibson, J. L., St Clair, M. C., Owens, M., Brodbeck, J., Dunn, V., Lewis, G., Croudace, T., Jones, P. B., Kievit, R. A., et al. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153715 · Cited by 248
Crockford, C., Deschner, T., Ziegler, T. E., & Wittig, R. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00068 · Cited by 187
Chang, S. W. C., & Platt, M. L. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.11.006 · Cited by 71
Self-citationRecognising the key role of individual recognition in social networks
Gokcekus, S., Firth, J. A., Regan, C., & Sheldon, B. C. (2021) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.009 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Brent, L. J. N., Chang, S. W. C., Gariépy, J., & Platt, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brent, Lauren J.N.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-11
- Volume
- 1316
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- PMC
- PMC4045505
- OpenAlex
- W1532218787
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 204
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01-MH-096875: LNJB, MLP, K99-MH-099093: SWCC, R01-MH-095894, R21-NS-078687, R01-MH-086712: MLP)
- Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (JFG)
- Duke Institute for Brain Sciences Incubator Award (MLP)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- friendship, neuroethology, social bonds, neural circuits, neuromodulation, autism spectrum disorder, depression, animal social behavior, social health, reproductive advantage, human uniqueness
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Neurobiology, Friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
