Cited by 52Music Therapy and HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

Efficacy of musical interventions in dementia: methodological requirements of nonpharmacological trials

Samson, Séverine, Clément, Sylvain, Narme, Pauline, Schiaratura, Loris, Ehrlé, Nathalie·2015·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The management of patients with Alzheimer's disease is a significant public health problem given the limited effectiveness of pharmacological therapies combined with iatrogenic effects of drug treatments in dementia. Consequently, the development of nondrug care, such as musical interventions, has become a necessity. The experimental rigor of studies in this area, however, is often lacking. It is therefore difficult to determine the impact of musical interventions on patients with dementia. As part of a series of studies, we carried out randomized controlled trials to compare the effectiveness of musical activities to other pleasant activities on various functions in patients with severe Alzheimer's disease. The data obtained in these trials are discussed in light of the methodological constraints and requirements specific to these clinical studies. Although the results demonstrate the power of music on the emotional and behavioral status of patients, they also suggest that other pleasant activities (e.g., cooking) are also effective, leaving open the question about the specific benefits of music in patients with dementia. All these findings highlight the promising potential for nonpharmacological treatments to improve the well-being of patients living in residential care and to reduce caregiver burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.12621

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samson, S., Clément, S., Narme, P., Schiaratura, L., & Ehrlé, N.
Affiliations
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
  • Université Lille Nord de France (FR)
  • Université Paris Descartes (FR)
  • Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Emotions, Cognition (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims (FR)
Corresponding author
Samson, Séverine
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03
Volume
1337
Issue
1
Pages
249-255
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2157482790
Cited by
52
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (09-BLAN-0310-02)
  • Fondation Plan Alzheimer (Private)
  • Institut Universitaire de France
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
music intervention, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, non-pharmacological treatment, randomized controlled trials, methodological quality, emotional well-being, behavioral symptoms, cooking, residential care, caregiver burden
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Behavior, Cognition, Dementia, Emotions, Humans, Music, Music Therapy, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review