Cited by 121Neuroscience and Music PerceptionDiverse Music Education InsightsCognitive Abilities and Testing

Music training and inhibitory control: A multidimensional model

Moreno, Sylvain, Farzan, Faranak·2015·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Training programs aimed to improve cognitive skills have either yielded mixed results or remain to be validated. The limited benefits of such regimens are largely attributable to weak understanding of (1) how (and which) interventions provide the most cognitive improvements; and (2) how brain networks and neural mechanisms that underlie specific cognitive abilities can be modified selectively. Studies indicate that music training leads to robust and long‐lasting benefits to behavior. Importantly, behavioral advantages conferred by music extend beyond perceptual abilities to even nonauditory functions, such as inhibitory control (IC) and its neural correlates. Alternative forms of arts engagement or brain training do not appear to yield such enhancements, which suggests that music uniquely taps into brain networks subserving a variety of auditory as well as domain‐general mechanisms such as IC. To account for such widespread benefits of music training, we propose a framework of transfer effects characterized by three dimensions: level of processing, nature of the transfer, and involvement of executive functions. We suggest that transfer of skills is mediated through modulation of general cognitive processes, in particular IC. We believe that this model offers a viable framework to test the extent and limitations of music‐related changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.12674

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreno, S., & Farzan, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Moreno, Sylvain
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03
Volume
1337
Issue
1
Pages
147-152
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1492179202
Cited by
121
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2014-06196)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
musical training, inhibitory control, transfer of learning, executive function, brain training, arts participation, levels of processing, neural correlates of inhibition, auditory cortex, cognitive enhancement
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Pathways, Auditory Perception, Behavior, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Cognition, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Language, Models, Neurological, Music, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurosciences, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review