Cited by 1,041Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children

Thorell, Lisa B., Lindqvist, Sofia, Bergman Nutley, Sissela, Bohlin, Gunilla, Klingberg, Torkel·2009·Developmental Science

Abstract

Executive functions, including working memory and inhibition, are of central importance to much of human behavior. Interventions intended to improve executive functions might therefore serve an important purpose. Previous studies show that working memory can be improved by training, but it is unknown if this also holds for inhibition, and whether it is possible to train executive functions in preschoolers. In the present study, preschool children received computerized training of either visuo‐spatial working memory or inhibition for 5 weeks. An active control group played commercially available computer games, and a passive control group took part in only pre‐ and posttesting. Children trained on working memory improved significantly on trained tasks; they showed training effects on non‐trained tests of spatial and verbal working memory, as well as transfer effects to attention. Children trained on inhibition showed a significant improvement over time on two out of three trained task paradigms, but no significant improvements relative to the control groups on tasks measuring working memory or attention. In neither of the two interventions were there effects on non‐trained inhibitory tasks. The results suggest that working memory training can have significant effects also among preschool children. The finding that inhibition could not be improved by either one of the two training programs might be due to the particular training program used in the present study or possibly indicate that executive functions differ in how easily they can be improved by training, which in turn might relate to differences in their underlying psychological and neural processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inhibitory skills could be trained in preschoolers.

    “even though it has been reported that inhibitory skills could be trained in preschoolers (e.g., Thorell et al., 2009)”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Thorell et al., 2009

  • In preschoolers, an inhibition intervention improved only the trained inhibitory control tasks.

    “The children who received the inhibition intervention only showed improved functioning in trained inhibitory control tasks.”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Thorell, Lindqvist, Bergman Nutley, Bohlin, & Klingberg, 2009

  • Cognitive training in preschoolers that targets attentional control and working memory is effective at least in the short term.

    “While this is a controversial area of research and practice, a couple of studies have shown cognitive training in preschoolers focusing on attentional control and working memory to be effective, at least in the short-term.”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Thorell, Lindqvist, Bergman Nutley, Bohlin, & Klingberg, 2009

  • In preschoolers, a working memory intervention improved trained and untrained working memory and attentional control tasks, but not untrained inhibitory control tasks.

    “In contrast to children in control conditions, children who received the working memory intervention showed improvements in trained and non-trained working memory tasks as well as in attentional control tasks, but no effects in non-trained inhibitory control tasks.”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Thorell, Lindqvist, Bergman Nutley, Bohlin, & Klingberg, 2009

  • Very few studies have directly compared the effects of WM and IC training across tasks.

    “to date very few studies have directly compared the effects of WM and IC training across tasks (see Thorell et al., 2009 for a comparison between WM and IC training in preschoolers).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Thorell et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thorell, L. B., Lindqvist, S., Bergman Nutley, S., Bohlin, G., & Klingberg, T.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Thorell, Lisa B.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-22
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
106-113
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2100160489
Cited by
1,041
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 67
FWCI
47.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vårdalstiftelsen
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
executive function, working memory training, inhibition training, preschool children, transfer effects, visuospatial working memory, verbal working memory, attention, computer-based training, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Attention, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Learning, Male, Memory, Problem Solving, Psychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review