Cited by 145Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Beyond perceived ability: the contribution of psychosocial factors to academic performance

Open access
Dixson, Dante D., Worrell, Frank C., Olszewski‐Kubilius, Paula, Subotnik, Rena F.·2016·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In this study, we examined the contributions of grit, hope, and academic self‐efficacy to academic achievement in a sample of 609 academically talented students ranging in age from 10 to 18 years. Our hypothesis was that these variables would predict academic achievement above and beyond the contributions of demographic variables and perceived ability. After establishing the reliability and structural validity of scores for the three constructs in this sample, regression analyses indicated that hope and academic self‐efficacy were predictors of perceived ability and that academic self‐efficacy was the most robust predictor of academic achievement. Grit was not a meaningful predictor of either perceived ability or academic achievement. We concluded that psychosocial variables can contribute to performance in talented students, but research is needed to establish which psychosocial variables are the most useful.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.13210

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosocial factors are important in helping gifted students develop their potential gifts, though some factors are probably more useful than others.

    “Psychosocial variables also play an important role in supporting gifted students in developing their potential gifts, although some of these variables are likely to be more useful than others (Dixson et al. 2016(Dixson et al. , 2017)).”

    From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Dixson et al. 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Rogers, K.B. 1986. Do the gifted think and learn differently? A review of recent research and its implications for instruc- tion. J. Educ. Gift. 10: 17-39.
  2. Mello, Z.R. & F.C. Worrell. 2015. The past, the present, and the future: a conceptual model of time perspective in adolescence. In Time Perspective Theory: Review, Research, and Application. Essays in honor of Phillip G. ZimbardoI. M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine & W. van Beek, Eds.: 115-129. Zug: Springer.
  3. Snyder, C.R., D. McDermott, W. Cook & M.A. Rapoff. 1997. Hope for the Journey. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  4. Gibb, J. 1990. The Hope Scale revisited: further validation of a measure of individual differences in the hope motive. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
  5. Kuncel, N.R., M. Credé & L.L. Thomas. 2005. The validity of self-reported grade point average, class ranks, and test scores: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Rev. Educ. Res. 75: 63-82.
  6. Hair, J.F., Jr., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, et al. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  7. Rimfeld, K., Y. Kovas, P.S. Dale & R. Plomin. 2016. True grit and genetics: predicting academic achievement from personality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/pspp0000089. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixson, D. D., Worrell, F. C., Olszewski‐Kubilius, P., & Subotnik, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • American Psychological Association (US)
Corresponding author
Dixson, Dante D.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08
Volume
1377
Issue
1
Pages
67-77
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2521555042
Cited by
145
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
13.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
grit, hope, academic self-efficacy, academic performance, perceived competence, academically talented students, psychosocial factors, gifted students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Gifted, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Perception, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Students, Self Efficacy, Hope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review