Cited by 2,520Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.

Zimbardo, Philip G., Boyd, John N.·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1999-12
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1271-1288
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4253063180
Cited by
2,520
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 157 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 193 · 2021: 177 · 2020: 209 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 138 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 140 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 73
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
time perception, time perspective, individual differences, personality traits, time orientation, measurement validity, reliability statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review