Cited by 14Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of screen time behaviour among North American indigenous populations

Foulds, H. J. A., Rodgers, C. D., Duncan, V., Ferguson, L. J.·2016·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Screen time (computer, television, video game and smartphone/tablet activity) is associated with increased obesity and other health risks. This systematic review evaluates screen time among North American Indigenous populations and compares it with that of North American Europeans. Electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched, and citations cross‐referenced. Included articles reported screen time among First Nations/American Indians, Métis, Inuit/Alaskan Natives or Native Hawaiians. From 788 citations evaluated, 40 identified articles report television, video game, computer and/or overall screen time. Overall screen time was 3.65 ± 1.26 h day −1 ( n = 2,242, 8 articles) among Indigenous children/youth and 3.61 ± 2.95 h day −1 ( n = 155, 1 article) among adults. Among children/youth, 66.0% ( n = 11 256, 9 articles) reported less than 2 h day −1 of television screen time, while only 52.8% ( n = 2,458, 1 article) of adults reported this volume. Screen time was generally greater among male population, youth, First Nations/American Indians and overweight/obese individuals. Indigenous children/youth reported greater overall screen time than North American Europeans (4.81 ± 2.84 h day −1 , n = 1,182 vs. 3.40 ± 2.81 h day −1 , n = 2,785; 3 articles; p < 0.0001). Screen time is common among North American Indigenous populations. Further research evaluating interventions to reduce screen time and chronic disease risks is required. © 2016 World Obesity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.12389

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foulds, H. J. A., Rodgers, C. D., Duncan, V., & Ferguson, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Foulds, H. J. A.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-17
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
455-466
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2298980788
Cited by
14
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Saskatchewan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
screen time, indigenous peoples, First Nations, Native Americans, Métis, Inuit, Native Hawaiians, television viewing, video game use, computer use, smartphone use, children and young people, obesity, overweight, sex differences, chronic disease risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Behavior, Child, Child, Preschool, Computers, Female, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review