Cited by 22Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomesdental development and anomaliesReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Zygomatic implant survival in 9 ectodermal dysplasia patients with 3.5‐ to 7‐year follow‐up

Open access
Goker, Funda, Grecchi, Emma, Mancini, Evangelista Giovanni, Del Fabbro, Massimo, Grecchi, Francesco·2020·Oral Diseases

Abstract

Objective: Ectodermal dysplasia syndrome is a complex group of genetic disorders identified by the abnormal development of the ectodermal structures. The aim of this retrospective clinical case series report was to evaluate the outcomes of the ectodermal dysplasia syndrome patients that underwent zygomatic implant surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 9 ectodermal dysplasia syndrome patients aged between 21 and 56 years (mean age 36.8) with severely atrophic maxilla were included in this study. All the patients were treated with a total of 19 zygomatic implants. The mean follow‐up of the patients was 55 months (with a range of 44–84 months). The implant survival rate was evaluated as a primary outcome. The intra‐ and postoperative complications were evaluated as additional criteria for success. Results: The overall implant survival rate was 100% without any complications. Final or provisional prosthesis was delivered on the same day of surgery, which resulted in an improvement of the quality of life of the patients. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, zygomatic surgery can be considered as a viable and safe alternative to conventional treatment modalities for oral rehabilitation of ectodermal dysplasia syndrome patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/odi.13505

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goker, F., Grecchi, E., Mancini, E. G., Del Fabbro, M., & Grecchi, F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences University of Milano Milan Italy
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi Milano Italy
  • IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio (IT)
Venue
Oral Diseases
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1803-1809
ISSN
  • 1354-523X (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-0825
OpenAlex
W3037465142
Cited by
22
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oral Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
zygomatic implants, implant survival, atrophic maxilla, maxillary reconstruction, oral rehabilitation, postoperative complications, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Zygoma, Dental Implants, Treatment Outcome, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review