Cited by 26Literacy and Educational PracticesAesthetic Perception and AnalysisDigital Media and Philosophy

The Digitization of Literary Reading: Contributions from Empirical Research

Mangen, Anne·2016·Orbis Litterarum

Abstract

With the growing popularity of e‐readers such as Kindle, literary reading is increasingly digitized. The transition from paper‐based to screen‐based literature invites theoretical and empirical reconsiderations of a number of basic research questions which might at first glance seem trivial: does it make a difference for aspects of the literary reading experience if the text is read on a screen‐based device rather than on paper? Findings from a recent experiment suggest that affordances of surf tablets such asiPad might negatively affect emotional aspects of reading. Referring to empirical research on emotional aspects of literary reading, the article aims to demonstrate the usefulness of more interdisciplinary approaches in studies of the literary reading experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/oli.12095

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mangen, A.
Affiliations
University of Stavanger (NO)
Corresponding author
Mangen, Anne
Venue
Orbis Litterarum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-11
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
240-262
ISSN
  • 0105-7510 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0730
OpenAlex
W2367850506
Cited by
26
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Orbis Litterarum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
literary reading, e-readers, digital reading, screen-based reading, paper-based reading, emotional response to literature, reading experience, iPad, affordances, interdisciplinary approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review