The Digitization of Literary Reading: Contributions from Empirical Research
Abstract
With the growing popularity of e‐readers such as Kindle, literary reading is increasingly digitized. The transition from paper‐based to screen‐based literature invites theoretical and empirical reconsiderations of a number of basic research questions which might at first glance seem trivial: does it make a difference for aspects of the literary reading experience if the text is read on a screen‐based device rather than on paper? Findings from a recent experiment suggest that affordances of surf tablets such asiPad might negatively affect emotional aspects of reading. Referring to empirical research on emotional aspects of literary reading, the article aims to demonstrate the usefulness of more interdisciplinary approaches in studies of the literary reading experience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies suggest that emotional transport into stories may be reduced in digital media.
“Recent studies (Mangen & Kuiken, 2014;Mangen, 2016) suggest that emotional transport into stories may be reduced in digital media.”
From Reading Books and Reading Minds: Differential Effects of Wonder and The Crossover on Empathy and Theory of Mind (2017) · cites this paper as Mangen, 2016
Cites
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness
O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000115 · Cited by 3,126 · see citing works
Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239918 · Cited by 1,642 · see citing works
The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x · Cited by 1,345 · see citing works
To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021890 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
Measuring Narrative Engagement
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260903287259 · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guarisco, M. S., Brooks, C., & Freeman, L. M. (2017) · Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature · doi:10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2017.3.1.24-54 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The complex relationship between gender, technology, and reading requires more research by both literary specialists and behavioral scientists (Mangen, 2016).”
Background
- Authors
- Mangen, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Stavanger (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Mangen, Anne
- ORCID
- Mangen, Anne
- Venue
- Orbis Litterarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-262
- ISSN
- 0105-7510 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0730
- OpenAlex
- W2367850506
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Orbis Litterarum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- literary reading, e-readers, digital reading, screen-based reading, paper-based reading, emotional response to literature, reading experience, iPad, affordances, interdisciplinary approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review