Reading Books and Reading Minds: Differential Effects of Wonder and The Crossover on Empathy and Theory of Mind
Open accessAbstract
We tested sixth graders for empathy and theory of mind before and after an academic unit on either Wonder or The Crossover. Wonder was associated with improved perspective-taking; students who read The Crossover increased in concern for others. Faux pas detection increased in both genders with Wonder, and in girls with The Crossover. Students who read The Crossover in print showed improved understanding of facial expressions, while students who used iPads declined. Young adult fiction is associated with improved social cognitive skills, but effects depend on gender and reading format, as well as on the choice of individual book.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a pre-post study of 78 sixth graders reading either *Wonder* or *The Crossover* during a 5-week unit, both books were associated with improved empathy and theory of mind, but specific gains differed by book, gender, and reading format. *Wonder* was linked to perspective-taking and faux-pas detection, while *The Crossover* was linked to empathic concern, with print versus iPad reading affecting facial-expression understanding.
Key findings
- *Wonder* was associated with increased Perspective Taking; *The Crossover* was associated with increased Empathic Concern. Boys had a larger Perspective Taking increase after *Wonder* (16.4%) than girls (2.2%), while girls reading *The Crossover* showed a slight, marginally significant decline in Perspective Taking (3.6%, p = 0.062).
- Faux pas detection increased after *Wonder* in both genders (32.98% increase); after *The Crossover*, the increase was smaller (20.8%) and restricted to girls.
- On the Eyes-C theory of mind test, *Wonder* readers showed no change. For *The Crossover*, students reading print improved in reading emotions from eyes, while students using iPads declined; this format effect was the same in both genders.
- Baseline gender differences appeared: girls scored higher than boys on Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking. Boys reported more engagement with iPads and girls more engagement with traditional books; 57/78 students chose *The Crossover*, and 33 reported reading digital versus 45 print.
Methods
- Pre-post within-subjects design during a 5-week academic unit beginning September 2015. Participants were 89 sixth-grade students from the Episcopal School of Baton Rouge, Louisiana; 78 (41 M, 37 F) provided usable data. Students chose *Wonder* or *The Crossover*; classes were assigned to print, iPad, or choice of format.
- Measures: Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) subscales Empathic Concern, Perspective Taking, and Fantasy Scale (7 items each, 5-point Likert, maximum 35); Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test for Children (Eyes-C; 28 items, maximum 28); and Faux Pas Test for Children (FP-C; 5 faux pas and 5 control stories, maximum 5 each). Baseline testing occurred before reading; post-unit testing occurred about one week after reading finished.
- Analysis: baseline differences were evaluated with three-way between-subjects ANOVA for gender, book choice, and anticipated reading format. Post-unit changes were assessed with four-way mixed-design ANOVA, with data analyzed separately for *Wonder* and *The Crossover* readers.
Limitations
- The paper states that classroom-based research makes it difficult to separate effects of the specific text from other classroom activities, though it argues book-specific changes make text exposure likely; it also cannot rule out book-specific classroom sub-environments. The *Wonder* group was too small to detect a gender-by-format interaction (only four boys and four girls read *Wonder* on iPad). How long improved social cognition persisted is unknown. Low minority participation meant race effects were not quantified. Anonymous assessments prevented linking individual Fantasy Scale scores to academic outcomes. Last-minute changes assigned additional students to digital reading, so format was not fully chosen or randomized.
- Evident from the text: book choice was self-selected, creating possible selection effects; the sample came from one school and one teacher, limiting generalizability; there was no non-reading control group; and empathy was measured by self-report.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
8 of 54 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
This finding eliminates the possibility that the students in the previous study, who were atypical in lacking the expected gender differences in empathy, were also atypical in their response to Wonder.
“In addition, this finding eliminates the possibility that the students in the previous study, who were atypical in lacking the expected gender differences in empathy (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015) were also atypical in their response to Wonder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source
The available article passages (pp. 56–57) describe improved empathy scores after the Wonder unit but do not report whether the students lacked the expected gender differences in empathy. I searched the indexed copy for gender differences and baseline comparisons; the matching description says outcomes were identical across genders, which does not establish that baseline empathy lacked a gender difference. The claim that a later finding eliminates a possibility is the citing authors’ inference, not the point this citation is asked to support. (LLM, conf=0.67)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
After the unit, students reported more inclination to examine situations from another's point of view.
“After the unit, students reported more inclination to examine situations from another's point of view, an important social skill for reducing conflict and improving understanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source
- Premisecitation
We previously reported that sixth graders' perspective-taking skills increased after a 5-week reading unit on Wonder.
“We previously reported (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015) that sixth graders' perspective-taking skills increased after a 5-week reading unit on Wonder (Palacio, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source
The paper’s description reports that sixth graders improved in perspective taking after an academic unit combining Wonder with lessons and an empathy-building activity. The cited passage on p. 56 also reports improved empathy-assessment scores after the unit. Our copy does not establish the claimed five-week duration (searched: “five weeks” and “5-week reading unit”). (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
After the Wonder unit, we observed a small but significant increase in one empathy subscale: Perspective Taking.
“After the Wonder unit, we observed a small but significant increase in one empathy subscale: Perspective Taking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source
The paper’s description says that sixth-grade students improved in perspective taking after an academic unit on Wonder, and the introduction (p. 56) reports improved empathy-assessment scores. The passages available from our copy do not establish that the increase was small or statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
We replicated the empathy increase after reading Wonder.
“We replicated the empathy increase after reading Wonder and extended them to a second book, The Crossover (Alexander, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Girls reported more engagement with reading when using traditional books.
“Furthermore, boys reported more engagement with reading when using iPad readers and girls more engagement with traditional books.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Faux pas detection increased in both genders with Wonder.
“Faux pas detection increased in both genders with Wonder, and in girls with The Crossover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Wonder readers had a significantly larger gender difference in Empathic Concern than The Crossover readers.
“Wonder readers had a significantly larger gender difference in Empathic Concern than The Crossover readers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We extended the empathy increase to The Crossover.
“We replicated the empathy increase after reading Wonder and extended them to a second book, The Crossover (Alexander, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Students who read The Crossover using iPads declined in understanding of facial expressions.
“Students who read The Crossover in print showed improved understanding of facial expressions, while students who used iPads declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Girls scored higher than boys on baseline Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking.
“As expected, girls scored higher than boys on baseline Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking (Fig. 1a); no other baseline score showed gender differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both books were associated with improved theory of mind skills.
“We found that both books were associated with improved theory of mind skills, although some effects were restricted to girls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fantasy Scale scores did not change significantly post-unit.
“Fantasy Scale scores did not change significantly post-unit, but girls continued to have higher scores with traditional print, while boys had higher scores with iPads.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Perspective Taking showed a similar pattern, with the difference between books bordering on statistical significance.
“Perspective Taking showed a similar pattern, with the difference between books bordering on statistical significance (Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our hypothesis that students would show improved empathy and theory of mind after the novel unit was confirmed.
“Our hypothesis that students would show improved empathy and theory of mind after the novel unit was confirmed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The two books differed in the specific subtype of empathy that improved after reading.
“However, the two books differed in the specific subtype of empathy that improved after reading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Faux pas detection increased in girls with The Crossover.
“Faux pas detection increased in both genders with Wonder, and in girls with The Crossover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some of the prosocial effects of reading were eliminated when students read the book in electronic format rather than traditional print.
“We found preliminary evidence that some of the prosocial effects of reading were eliminated when students read the book in electronic format rather than traditional print.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Crossover was associated with increased Empathic Concern.
“Reading Wonder was associated with increased Perspective Taking (Fig. 2a), while The Crossover was associated with increased Empathic Concern (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of reading format on Eyes-C score was the same in both genders.
“Unlike with Fantasy Scale, the effect of format on Eyes-C score was the same in both genders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The pattern of larger gender differences in empathy in Wonder readers persisted throughout the study, independent of other changes with reading.
“The pattern of larger gender differences in empathy in Wonder readers persisted throughout the study, independent of other changes with reading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The gender difference in Fantasy Scale was reversed in students reading print.
“The gender difference was reversed in students reading print (Fig. 1c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Scores on Renaissance Learning's STAR test showed a pattern similar to baseline Fantasy Scale: boys using iPads had the highest average score and girls using iPads the lowest.
“However, post-hoc analysis of class grades found that, while reading format made no difference in scores on the unit test, scores on Renaissance Learning's STAR test (a gauge of reading level) showed a pattern similar to baseline Fantasy Scale: boys using iPads had the highest average score and girls using iPads the lowest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No change in ability to infer emotions from eyes was seen in the Wonder group.
“No change in ability to infer emotions from eyes was seen in the Wonder group, perhaps because of smaller sample size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No other baseline score showed gender differences.
“As expected, girls scored higher than boys on baseline Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking (Fig. 1a); no other baseline score showed gender differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Reading Wonder was associated with increased Perspective Taking.
“Reading Wonder was associated with increased Perspective Taking (Fig. 2a), while The Crossover was associated with increased Empathic Concern (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Wonder and The Crossover are associated with different empathy changes.
“Wonder and The Crossover are associated with different empathy changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Students who read The Crossover increased in concern for others.
“students who read The Crossover increased in concern for others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some effects on theory of mind were restricted to girls.
“We found that both books were associated with improved theory of mind skills, although some effects were restricted to girls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among students who planned to read iPads, boys had higher Fantasy Scale scores than girls.
“Among students who planned to read iPads, boys had higher Fantasy Scale scores than girls, indicating that they saw themselves more mentally connected to fiction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Effects of reading The Crossover on Perspective Taking marginally depended on gender.
“However, effects of reading The Crossover on Perspective Taking marginally depended on gender.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Boys reported more engagement with reading when using iPad readers.
“Furthermore, boys reported more engagement with reading when using iPad readers and girls more engagement with traditional books.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Changes in the Eyes-C test were independent of changes in faux pas detection.
“Changes in the second theory of mind test, the Eyes-C, were independent of changes in faux pas detection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At least in the Crossover group, the interaction of gender and reading format persisted throughout the study when considering the format the students actually used.
“At least in the Crossover groupfoot_0 , this interaction of gender and reading format persisted throughout the study when we considered the format the students actually used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Post-hoc analysis of class grades found that reading format made no difference in scores on the unit test.
“However, post-hoc analysis of class grades found that, while reading format made no difference in scores on the unit test, scores on Renaissance Learning's STAR test (a gauge of reading level) showed a pattern similar to baseline Fantasy Scale: boys using iPads had the highest average score and girls using iPads the lowest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Students who read The Crossover in print showed improved understanding of facial expressions.
“Students who read The Crossover in print showed improved understanding of facial expressions, while students who used iPads declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Wonder was associated with improved perspective-taking in sixth graders after an academic unit.
“Wonder was associated with improved perspective-taking; students who read The Crossover increased in concern for others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With few exceptions, the changes in social cognition were positive for both books.
“What is remarkable is that, with few exceptions, the changes were positive for both books.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gender differences in baseline empathy were larger in the group that chose Wonder (N=21) than in the group that chose The Crossover (N=57).
“Gender differences were larger in the group that choose Wonder (N=21) than in the group that choose The Crossover (N=57).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There were no differences among the control scores.
“There were no differences among the control scores.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“There were no significant changes in the control scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
- Findingown data
There was a slight, marginally significant decline in Perspective Taking in girls who read The Crossover.
“One exception to the positive psychosocial changes seen was the slight, marginally significant decline in Perspective Taking in girls who read The Crossover (Fig 2c).”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“For boys reading The Crossover, Perspective Taking did not change after the unit; for girls, scores trended downward slightly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
- Findingown data
Only after reading The Crossover did girls surpass boys in faux pas detection.
“Only after reading The Crossover did girls surpass boys.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We saw no gender difference in faux pas detection at the beginning of our study.
“Although Baron-Cohen et al. (1999) reported that girls outscore boys on faux pas detection between the ages of 7 and 11, we saw no such gender difference at the beginning of our study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Exposure to storybooks is associated with better theory of mind skills in preschoolers.
“Exposure to storybooks is associated with better theory of mind skills in preschoolers (Mar, Tackett, & Moore, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mar, Tackett, & Moore, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Correlational studies show associations between social cognitive skills and long-term reading habits.
“The second are correlational studies (e.g.Mar et al, 2006;2008) that show associations between social cognitive skills and long-term reading habits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mar et al, 2006;2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The benefits of experiencing the character Auggie's challenges, from both his own and others' perspectives, generalized beyond compassion for those with physical disfigurements.
“The benefits of experiencing the character Auggie's challenges, from both his own and others' perspectives, generalized beyond compassion for those with physical disfigurements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
More students are using electronic reading devices rather than traditional print books.
“At the same time, more students are using electronic reading devices rather than traditional print books (Barnyak & McNelly, 2015;Goodwyn, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Barnyak & McNelly, 2015 source
- cites Goodwyn, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Personality traits, including empathy, are typically resistant to long-term change.
“Personality traits, including empathy, are typically resistant to long-term change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCrae, Gaines & Wellington, 2012 source
- Interpretationown data
This is the first study to show that middle grade novels are associated with both empathy and theory of mind improvements when read by their intended age groups.
“To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that middle grade novels are associated with both empathy and theory of mind improvements when read by their intended age groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Effects of fiction could depend on what reading format students use, or anticipate using.
“Since mental transport into fiction is necessary for social benefits (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013;Johnson 2012;Johnson et al., 2013a), our Fantasy Scale results suggest that effects of fiction could depend on what reading format students use, or anticipate using.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The finding that iPads and traditional books had opposite effects on Eyes-C test scores is further evidence that the digital reading experience may differ psychologically from that of traditional print.
“Our finding that iPads and traditional books had opposite effects on the Eyes-C test scores is further evidence that the digital reading experience may differ psychologically from that of traditional print.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Reading format could affect fiction's ability to enhance some aspects of theory of mind.
“This raises the intriguing possibility that reading format could affect fiction's ability to enhance some aspects of theory of mind.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
In the current study, students in the same class sections participated in similar learning activities while reading different books.
“However, in the current study, students in the same class sections participated in similar learning activities while reading different books.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since changes in social cognition varied with book, they are likely related to exposure to the specific text.
“Since changes in social cognition varied with book, they are likely to be in some way related to exposure to the specific text.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The social benefits of fiction reading in adults are not duplicated with nonfiction.
“The social benefits of fiction reading in adults are not duplicated with nonfiction (Mar et al., 2006;2008;Kidd & Castano, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mar et al., 2006;2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kidd & Castano, 2013 source
- Interpretationown data
These two young adult books have social benefits similar to literary fiction for adults.
“Students showed increases in both empathy and theory of mind after the unit, suggesting that these two young adult books have social benefits similar to literary fiction for adults.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The observation that different empathy and theory of mind changes were associated with the two books makes it more likely that the changes were the result of exposure to the specific texts, rather than classroom activities, or other changes that happened within the school environment during the academic unit.
“The observation that different empathy and theory of mind changes were associated with the two books makes it more likely that the changes were the result of exposure to the specific texts, rather than classroom activities, or other changes that happened within the school environment during the academic unit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This academic unit specifically increased the ability to detect social gaffes caused by missing or incorrect information.
“Scores on faux pas recognition questions, but not control questions, increased in students who read Wonder, suggesting that this academic unit specifically increased the ability to detect social gaffes caused by missing or incorrect information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 54
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 56
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe increase in Perspective Taking after reading Wonder replicates our previous study, even though the current sample was much smaller.
“The increase in Perspective Taking after reading Wonder replicates our previous study (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015), even though the current sample was much smaller.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChinese college students recalled nonfiction better after reading it on paper than on a computer screen, with electronic tablets intermediate between the two; however, recall was higher in more experienced tablet users.
“Chinese college students recalled nonfiction better after reading it on paper than on a computer screen, with electronic tablets intermediate between the two; however, recall was higher in more experienced tablet users (Chen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2014 source
The Participants (p. 5) and Reading materials (p. 6) sections describe Chinese college students reading expository texts. The Discussion (p. 8) reports tablet scores between paper and computer scores, while the Results (p. 7) find higher summarization scores among highly familiar tablet users. But the paper measured comprehension through multiple-choice questions and summaries, not recall as such; only the paper–computer difference on multiple-choice comprehension was statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationClassroom activities presumably encouraged extended and deeper reflection about the text, which may have helped psychosocial changes develop and persist.
“Classroom activities presumably encouraged extended and deeper reflection about the text, which may have helped psychosocial changes develop and persist (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bal & Veltkamp, 2013 source
The Introduction’s “Sleeper Effects of Fiction on Outcomes” section proposes that time to rethink and relive a story can allow changes in empathy to emerge. The General Discussion likewise describes reflection during an incubation period. Neither passage addresses classroom activities or shows that they encouraged deeper reflection, so that part of the attributed explanation is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMental transport into fiction is necessary for social benefits.
“Since mental transport into fiction is necessary for social benefits (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013;Johnson 2012;Johnson et al., 2013a), our Fantasy Scale results suggest that effects of fiction could depend on what reading format students use, or anticipate using.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Bal & Veltkamp, 2013 source
The Introduction proposes that fiction enhances empathy only when readers are emotionally transported, and the Conclusion reports that low transportation was related to lower empathy while high transportation might be related to higher empathy (page unavailable). This supports the claim for empathy, but the paper does not establish that transportation is necessary for social benefits generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Johnson 2012 source
- cites Johnson et al., 2013a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two books had different effects, and both gender and book format modulated the effect of reading.
“However, the two books had different effects, and both gender and book format modulated the effect of reading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor students who read The Crossover, the increase in faux pas scores was smaller (20.8%) than for Wonder (32.98%) and was restricted to girls.
“For students who read The Crossover, the increase in faux pas scores was smaller (20.8% compared to Wonder's 32.98%) and restricted to girls (Fig 3b).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“For The Crossover, the increase was smaller and restricted to girls.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
“For students reading The Crossover, the increase in faux pas detection bordered on significance and was restricted to girls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGirls continued to have higher Fantasy Scale scores with traditional print, while boys had higher scores with iPads.
“Fantasy Scale scores did not change significantly post-unit, but girls continued to have higher scores with traditional print, while boys had higher scores with iPads.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither gender nor reading format made a difference in the effect of The Crossover unit on Empathic Concern.
“Neither gender nor reading format made a difference in the effect of The Crossover unit on Empathic Concern.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoys' Perspective-Taking scores were unchanged after completing the Crossover unit, while girls' trended downward slightly.
“Boys' Perspective-Taking scores were unchanged after completing the Crossover unit, while girls' trended downward slightly (Fig 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven though boys felt more mentally engaged when using iPads, they declined in sensitivity to facial expressions.
“Thus, even though boys felt more mentally engaged when using iPads, they declined in sensitivity to facial expressions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataScores on faux pas questions, but not control questions, increased significantly after the Wonder unit.
“Scores on the faux pas, but not control questions, increased significantly after the Wonder unit (Fig 3a).”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
“Scores on faux pas recognition questions, but not control questions, increased in students who read Wonder, suggesting that this academic unit specifically increased the ability to detect social gaffes caused by missing or incorrect information.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“The ability to detect faux pas increased in both genders after reading Wonder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Crossover group, Eyes-C scores improved only in students reading print; students using iPads declined on this measure.
“In the Crossover group, Eyes-C scores improved only in the students reading print; students using iPads actually declined on this measure (Fig 3c).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
“For The Crossover, this ability increased in students who read the book in print, but decreased in students who used iPads.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“Those reading print form improved in their ability to interpret emotions from pictures of eyes, while those using iPads went down on that measure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBaseline Fantasy Scale scores were similar for both book groups, but depended on both gender and the format that the students anticipated reading.
“Baseline Fantasy Scale scores were similar for both book groups, but depended on both gender and the format that the students anticipated reading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPerspective Taking's failure to increase in the Crossover readers - and even slight decline (3.6%) in girls - may initially seem puzzling.
“Therefore, Perspective Taking's failure to increase in the Crossover readers -and even slight decline (3.6%) in girls (Fig 2c.)-may initially seem puzzling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChanges in faux pas scores after reading Wonder were the same in both genders and with both reading formats.
“Changes after reading were the same in both genders and with both reading formats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSmall group discussions on socioeconomic class were superficial, but students were more open to sharing in the whole class with the teacher facilitating.
“While the small group discussions on this topic were superficial, students were much more open to sharing in the whole class, with the teacher facilitating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe slight decrease in girls' Perspective Taking after reading The Crossover was offset by gains in Empathic Concern comparable to the boys' and trends in improved faux pas detection that boys did not show.
“The slight decrease in girls' Perspective Taking was offset by gains in Empathic Concern that were comparable to the boys', and trends in improved faux pas detection that boys did not show (Fig. 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of students who did not choose The Crossover for their novel study subsequently read it independently, largely because the book generated positive buzz.
“The majority of the students who did not choose The Crossover for their novel study subsequently read it independently, in large part because the book generated so much positive buzz.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenDuring group work, students re-read the section in which a police officer pulls over Josh's father, and Josh is clearly nervous that the situation could escalate.
“During group work, students re-read the section in which a police officer pulls over Josh's father, and Josh is clearly nervous that the situation could escalate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenWhile completing their character-in-a-bag projects, several Caucasian students did not realize that the protagonists were African-American.
“While completing their character-in-a-bag projects, several Caucasian students did not realize that the protagonists were African-American.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudents showed increases in both empathy and theory of mind after the unit.
“Students showed increases in both empathy and theory of mind after the unit, suggesting that these two young adult books have social benefits similar to literary fiction for adults.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenUnderstanding the role of class conflict in Jack's character development required frank discussion of socioeconomic class and how it feels to be surrounded by students with lavish lifestyles.
“Understanding the role of class conflict in Jack's character development required frank discussion of socioeconomic class and how it feels to be surrounded by students with lavish lifestyles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpecific effects depended on the book: Wonder was associated with higher Perspective Taking, and The Crossover with higher Empathic Concern.
“Specific effects depended on the book, with Wonder associated with higher Perspective Taking and The Crossover with higher Empathic Concern.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“For students who read Wonder, only Perspective Taking increased after the unit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAll changes in empathy and theory of mind occurred over a 5-week period and were present a week after reading was complete.
“All changes in empathy and theory of mind occurred over a 5-week period and were present a week after reading was complete.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenGroups assigned to follow the twins' mother struggled to find relevant quotes and items to include in their character bag.
“Groups assigned to follow the twins' mother struggled to find relevant quotes and items to include in their character bag.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataStudents were eager to tackle the conversation about socioeconomic class, mentioning extravagant birthday parties and international travel.
“Surprisingly, students were eager to tackle this conversation, mentioning extravagant birthday parties and international travel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGirls had significantly higher baseline scores than boys in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking, but not in the other four measures.
“Girls had significantly higher baseline scores than boys in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking, but not in the other four measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMost students did not realize the significance of the police officer pulling over Josh's father.
“Most students did not realize the significance of this seemingly minor detail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThere was no relationship between gender and book choice.
“There was no relationship between gender and book choice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationLosing track of place and awkwardness could have reduced connection to the narrative in our readers.
“Both effects could have reduced connection to the narrative in our readers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataBecause of the low number of minority participants, we did not quantify effects of race.
“Because of the low number of minority participants, we did not quantify effects of race.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test for Children (Eyes-C) is a well-validated theory of mind test for children that measures the ability to infer emotional state from a picture of the eyes.
“This is a wellvalidated theory of mind test for children that measures the ability to infer emotional state from a picture of the eyes (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAn alternate explanation is that the stronger boy and weaker girl readers were placed, by chance, in the digital group, and that the stronger readers are also more caught up in fiction.
“An alternate explanation is that the stronger boy and weaker girl readers were placed, by chance, in the digital group, and that the stronger readers are also more caught up in fiction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataYoung adult fiction is associated with improved social cognitive skills, but effects depend on gender and reading format, as well as on the choice of individual book.
“Young adult fiction is associated with improved social cognitive skills, but effects depend on gender and reading format, as well as on the choice of individual book.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMangen and Kuiken (2014) also found that even experienced iPad readers were more likely to lose track of their place in the text and to report awkwardness when using the device.
“Mangen and Kuiken (2014) also found that even experienced iPad readers were more likely to lose track of their place in the text and to report awkwardness when using the device.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mangen and Kuiken (2014) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Faux Pas Test for Children (FP-C) requires recognizing faux pas: social errors caused by false belief.
“This theory of mind test requires recognizing faux pas: social errors caused by false belief (Baron-Cohen et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baron-Cohen et al., 1999 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) is an established measure of empathy.
“The IRI is an established measure of empathy (Davis, 1981).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA study of Chinese sixth graders reading science texts on electronic tablets found that girls recalled the material better and were more likely to use note-taking applications than boys; boys were more likely to be distracted by drawing and game tools.
“A study of Chinese sixth graders reading science texts on electronic tablets found that girls recalled the material better and were more likely to use note-taking applications than boys; boys were more likely to be distracted by drawing and game tools (Huang et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationReaders may respond differently to Wonder's narrative prose than to The Crossover's verse.
“Second, readers may respond differently to Wonder's narrative prose than to The Crossover's verse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMargolin, Driscoll, Toland and Kegler (2013) found no difference between computer, e-reader, or print reading comprehension in U.S. college students who routinely used educational technology.
“Margolin, Driscoll, Toland and Kegler (2013) found no difference between computer, e-reader, or print reading comprehension in U.S. college students who routinely used educational technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Margolin, Driscoll, Toland and Kegler (2013) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationScores on the adult version of the Eyes-C test show improvement after reading literary fiction.
“Scores on the adult version of this test show improvement after reading literary fiction (Kidd & Castano, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kidd & Castano, 2013 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe increase in Eyes-C score with print and decrease with iPad suggests changes are related to the reading experience, because classroom activities were virtually identical for these two groups.
“Similarly, an increase in Eyes-C score with print and a decrease with iPad suggests changes are related to the reading experience; classroom activities would have been virtually identical for these two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis increase in emotional projection is associated with higher willingness to help others, agreeableness, and openness.
“While this increase is associated with higher willingness to help others, agreeableness, and openness, this fondness for fantasy is also associated with social anxiety and emotional instability in teens (Hawk et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hawk et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDirect experience with multiple literary perspectives may draw more attention to the benefits of adopting another's perspective in a real-life conflict.
“Direct experience with multiple literary perspectives may draw more attention to the benefits of adopting another's perspective in a real-life conflict.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEmotional projection into fiction increases in both genders.
“Emotional projection into fiction also increases in both genders (Hawk et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hawk et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThis is evidence that Wonder attracted the more empathic girls, but the less empathic boys.
“This is evidence that Wonder attracted the more empathic girls, but the less empathic boys.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe increase in ability to detect faux pas may have been larger with Wonder because Wonder includes several examples of social gaffes similar to the FP-C examples.
“The increase in ability to detect faux pas may have been larger with Wonder because it includes several examples of social gaffes similar to the FP-C examples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDjikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.
“Djikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djikic and Oatley (2014) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent studies suggest that emotional transport into stories may be reduced in digital media.
“Recent studies (Mangen & Kuiken, 2014;Mangen, 2016) suggest that emotional transport into stories may be reduced in digital media.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent psychology research has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.
“Recent psychology research (Djikic & Oatley, 2014, review) has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djikic & Oatley, 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis fondness for fantasy is associated with social anxiety and emotional instability in teens.
“While this increase is associated with higher willingness to help others, agreeableness, and openness, this fondness for fantasy is also associated with social anxiety and emotional instability in teens (Hawk et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hawk et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKidd and Castano (2013) found that only literary, not popular fiction, improved theory of mind in adults.
“Kidd and Castano (2013) found that only literary, not popular fiction, improved theory of mind in adults; whether that distinction is meaningful for younger readers is unknown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kidd and Castano (2013) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe iPads benefited boys, improving both reading engagement and performance, while having the opposite effect in girls.
“This raises the intriguing possibility that, in our students, the iPads benefited boys, improving both reading engagement and performance, while having the opposite effect in girls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningStudents identified their tests with school passwords to assure anonymity while allowing comparison of individual scores before and after the unit.
“To assure anonymity, while also allowing comparison of individual scores before and after the unit, students identified their tests with school passwords.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBarnyak and McNelly (2015) found that early elementary students independently using e-readers for nonfiction texts recalled details better than those using print; however, neither group performed as well as a group reading the print books with teacher support.
“Barnyak and McNelly (2015) found that early elementary students independently using e-readers for nonfiction texts recalled details better than those using print; however, neither group performed as well as a group reading the print books with teacher support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barnyak and McNelly (2015) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWonder's multiple narrators require considering the story from different viewpoints, while The Crossover is told only in Josh's voice.
“One key difference is that Wonder's multiple narrators require considering the story from different viewpoints, while The Crossover is told only in Josh's voice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent functional MRI studies found that poetry and prose activated different brain regions, with poetry more likely to stimulate brain areas involved in emotional responses to music and introspection.
“Recent functional MRI studies found that poetry and prose activated different brain regions, with poetry more likely to stimulate brain areas involved in emotional responses to music and introspection (Zeman, Milton, Smith & Rylance, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeman, Milton, Smith & Rylance, 2013
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of change in Eyes-C in the Wonder group may be because of smaller sample size.
“No change in ability to infer emotions from eyes was seen in the Wonder group, perhaps because of smaller sample size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJohnson (2012) found that reading and mentally engaging with a short story increased college students' sensitivity to fearful facial expressions, along with empathy and altruism.
“Johnson (2012) found that reading and mentally engaging with a short story increased college students' sensitivity to fearful facial expressions, along with empathy and altruism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson (2012) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataUnlike previous experiments that examined immediate effects, our study tested students a week after they finished reading the novel.
“However, both of those experiments examined immediate effects; in our study, testing was a week after the students finished reading the novel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mary Baldwin University, and parents gave informed consent while students gave written assent.
“Parents gave informed consent for student participation, while the students gave written assent.The school principal gave permission for the study and the Institutional Review Board of Mary Baldwin University approved all psychological testing procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSeveral teams have reported increased tolerance after multi-week behavioral interventions involving reading and discussing stories about stigmatized groups.
“While several teams (e.g.Cameron & Rutland, 2006; Cameron, Rutland, Brown & Douch, 2006; Vezzali, Stathi & Giovannini, 2012; Vezzali et al., 2014) have reported increased tolerance after multi-week behavioral interventions involving reading and discussing stories about stigmatized groups, it is not clear to what extent such interventions contribute to the schools' academic goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWe measured empathy for real-life acquaintances, not for the characters in the reading, and our students' assessments occurred a week after reading completion rather than immediately.
“However, we measured empathy for real-life acquaintances, not for the characters in the reading, and our students' assessments occurred a week after reading completion, rather than immediately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.
“The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Djikic and Oatley (2014) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause our psychological assessments were collected anonymously, it was not possible to connect individual students' reported Fantasy Scale scores to academic outcome.
“Because our psychological assessments were collected anonymously, it was not possible to connect individual students' reported Fantasy Scale scores to academic outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationResearchers have found consistent gender differences in IRI scores by age 13.
“Researchers have found consistent gender differences in IRI scores by age 13 (Hawk et al, 2014;Van der Graaf et al., 2013), although we did not see such differences in our previous Wonder study (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hawk et al, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Van der Graaf et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReading literary, but not popular, fiction is associated with increases in the ability to infer emotions from pictures of eyes in adults.
“Reading literary, but not popular, fiction is associated with increases in the ability to infer emotions from pictures of eyes in adults (Kidd & Castano, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kidd & Castano, 2013 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEngagement with fiction is thought to simulate social contact, improve the ability to understand others' thoughts and feelings, and reduce prejudice.
“Engagement with fiction is thought to simulate social contact (Mar & Oatley, 2008), improve the ability to understand others' thoughts and feelings (Kidd & Castano, 2013;Johnson, 2012;Mar et al., 2008) and reduce prejudice (Johnson et al., 2013b;Vezzali et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationProse may enhance empathy on a cognitive level, while verse acts on a more emotional mechanism.
“Prose may enhance empathy on a cognitive level, while verse acts on a more emotional mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome empathic tendencies (concern for others, adopting another's viewpoint) increase in girls, but decrease in boys, amplifying already existing gender differences.
“Some empathic tendencies (concern for others, adopting another's viewpoint) increase in girls, but decrease in boys, amplifying already existing gender differences (Van der Graaf et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van der Graaf et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataEleven children failed to complete both surveys or provided non-matching codes, leaving 78 participants (41 M, 37 F) with usable data.
“Eleven children failed to complete both surveys or provided non-matching codes, leaving 78 participants (41 M, 37 F) with usable data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA year of acting classes at age 14 increased both empathy and theory of mind skills; comparable lessons in music or art did not.
“For example, a year of acting classes at age 14 increased both empathy and theory of mind skills; comparable lessons in music or art did not (Goldstein & Winner, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goldstein & Winner, 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Mangen and Kuiken (2014), the differences between paper and iPad were present only in the group that believed they were reading nonfiction; reading format did not affect narrative engagement when readers believed the story was fiction.
“However, these differences were present only in the group that believed they were reading nonfiction; reading format did not affect narrative engagement when readers believed the story was fiction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mangen and Kuiken (2014) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMost studies report high student interest in e-books.
“Most studies report high student interest in e-books (e.g.Barnyak & McNelly, 2015; Goodwyn, 2014; Huang, Liang & Chui, 2013), but it is unclear whether this enthusiasm translates into more careful reading or better understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Barnyak & McNelly, 2015 source
- cites Goodwyn, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Huang, Liang & Chui, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGender differences in Eyes-C scores have been reported in early adolescence.
“Gender differences in Eyes-C scores (Baron-Cohen et al., 1999) have been reported in early adolescence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baron-Cohen et al., 1999 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe Wonder group was too small to detect an interaction effect of gender and reading format; only four boys and four girls read Wonder on the iPad.
“The Wonder group was too small to expect to be able to detect an interaction effect of gender and reading format; only four boys and four girls read Wonder on the iPad.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe decline in Perspective Taking in girls who read The Crossover could be related to the relative lack of female characters.
“The reason for the decline is unclear, but could be related to the relative lack of female characters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Johnson's (2013a) short-term study of college students, guided imagery generation was necessary for a short story to have empathy-enhancing effects; no increase was seen in students instructed to read the story as they would for leisure.
“In Johnson's (2013a) short-term study of college students, guided imagery generation was necessary for a short story to have empathy-enhancing effects; no increase was seen in students instructed to read the story as they would for leisure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson's (2013a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe Crossover lacked the explicit social gaffe object lessons of Wonder, which was associated with improved faux pas detection in both genders.
“The Crossover lacked the explicit social gaffe object lessons of Wonder, which was associated with improved faux pas detection in both genders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe Crossover boys began with higher Perspective Taking than Wonder boys, which may have contributed to the lack of measurable improvement.
“The Crossover boys began with higher Perspective Taking than Wonder boys, which may have contributed to the lack of measurable improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBoys may have focused more on the act of physical aggression that was a key plot point in The Crossover.
“Boys may have focused more on the act of physical aggression that was a key plot point in that book.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBaron-Cohen et al. (1999) reported that girls outscore boys on faux pas detection between the ages of 7 and 11.
“Although Baron-Cohen et al. (1999) reported that girls outscore boys on faux pas detection between the ages of 7 and 11, we saw no such gender difference at the beginning of our study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baron-Cohen et al. (1999) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis could lead girls to more carefully consider interpersonal interactions where someone could be unintentionally hurt emotionally, and thereby glean more theory of mind skills from The Crossover.
“This could lead girls to more carefully consider interpersonal interactions where someone could be unintentionally hurt emotionally, and thereby glean more theory of mind skills from The Crossover.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe efforts to introduce sixth graders to studying novels with Wonder and The Crossover were successful both academically and socially.
“Efforts to introduce sixth graders to studying novels with Wonder and The Crossover were successful both on an academic and social level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSimulated social contact may have been more subtle in the singly narrated poetry of The Crossover.
“Simulated social contact may have been more subtle in the singly narrated poetry of The Crossover.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPre-existing personality differences may have affected the children's choice of book, with boys who were lower in empathy preferring Wonder.
“Pre-existing personality differences may have affected the children's choice of book, with boys who were lower in empathy preferring Wonder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningGirls may have better related to the well-developed and similarly-aged female characters of Wonder than to Josh's mother, who is also the assistant principal and a dual authority figure.
“Girls may have better related to the well-developed and similarly-aged female characters of Wonder than to Josh's mother, who is also the assistant principal of his school and therefore a dual authority figure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe within-subjects design, comparing individual students' scores before and after the unit, controls for expected gender differences and other baseline differences related to book selection or reading format.
“Our within-subjects design, which compares individual students' scores before the unit to those after, controls for expected gender differences and other baseline differences related to book selection or reading format.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Few studies have investigated whether young adult literature has prosocial effects on its intended age group.
“However, few studies have investigated whether young adult literature has prosocial effects on its intended age group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Experimental evidence for effects that fall between immediate and long-term is lacking.
“Unfortunately, experimental evidence for effects that fall between the two is lacking.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To date, few researchers have explicitly addressed how students' social attitudes change after studying a piece of fiction.
“To date, few researchers have explicitly addressed how students' social attitudes change after studying a piece of fiction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Published experiments have focused on reducing specific prejudices rather than increasing general empathy.
“Published experiments have focused on reducing specific prejudices rather than increasing general empathy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social cognitive skills mature throughout adolescence and remain malleable to environmental factors.
“Social cognitive skills mature throughout adolescence and remain malleable to environmental factors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Both empathy and theory of mind skills are enhanced by stimulating social environments, even at young ages.
“Both empathy and theory of mind skills are enhanced by stimulating social environments, even at young ages.”
Cites
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272 · see citing works
Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239918 · Cited by 1,642 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Reading literary, but not popular, fiction is associated with increases in the ability to infer emotions from pictures of eyes in adults (Kidd & Castano, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x · Cited by 1,345 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Engagement with fiction is thought to simulate social contact (Mar & Oatley, 2008), improve the ability to understand others’ thoughts and feelings (Kidd & Castano, 2013; Johnson, 2012; Mar et al., 2008) and reduce prejudice (Johnson et al., 2013b; Vezzali et al., 2012).”
BackgroundBaron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1023035012436 · Cited by 1,211 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Gender differences in Eyes-C scores (Baron-Cohen et al., 1999) have been reported in early adolescence.”
BackgroundInfluentialMar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 · Cited by 614 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Adult fiction readers are more sociable, more open to experience, more empathic, and better attuned to the feelings and thoughts of others (Kidd & Castano, 2013; Mar et al., 2006; Mar, Oatley & Peterson, 2008; Stansfield & Bunce, 2013).”
BackgroundPerspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes.
der Graaff, J. V., Branje, S., de Wied, M. A., Hawk, S. T., van Lier, P. A. C., & Meeus, W. (2013) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034325 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 · Cited by 588 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…shown that reading fiction can have immediate measurable effects: increasing altruism, tolerance, perspective-taking, and theory of mind skills (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013; Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature VOLUME 2(2) 2017 Djikic, Oatley & Moldoveanu, 2013; Kidd & Castano,…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009) · COMM · doi:10.1515/comm.2009.025 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R. (2006) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Enhancing Empathy and Theory of Mind
Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E. (2012) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.573514 · Cited by 429 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, a year of acting classes at age 14 increased both empathy and theory of mind skills; comparable lessons in music or art did not (Goldstein & Winner, 2012).”
Background(2001) · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Johnson, D. R. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005 · Cited by 343 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Engagement with fiction is thought to simulate social contact (Mar & Oatley, 2008), improve the ability to understand others’ thoughts and feelings (Kidd & Castano, 2013; Johnson, 2012; Mar et al., 2008) and reduce prejudice (Johnson et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialExtended Contact through Story Reading in School: Reducing Children's Prejudice toward the Disabled
Cameron, L., & Rutland, A. (2006) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00469.x · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Hawk, S. T., Keijsers, L., Branje, S., der Graaff, J. V., de Wied, M. A., & Meeus, W. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.696080 · Cited by 219 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While this increase is associated with higher willingness to help others, agreeableness, and openness, this fondness for fantasy is also associated with social anxiety and emotional instability in teens (Hawk et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialE-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms?
Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2930 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013) · Scientific Study of Literature · doi:10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Exposure to media and theory-of-mind development in preschoolers
Mar, R. A., Tackett, J. L., & Moore, C. L. (2009) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Johnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S. (2013) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0033261 · Cited by 146 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Other studies (Djikic et al, 2013; Johnson et al., 2013b) also have found that reading enhanced empathy only in those with lower starting points.”
BackgroundResultLost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014) · Scientific Study of Literature · doi:10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man · Cited by 141 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Mangen and Kuiken (2014) asked college students to read an emotional murder story from either paper or an iPad.”
BackgroundInfluentialChen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T.-W., Zheng, X., & Huang, R. (2014) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-014-0012-z · Cited by 134 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Chinese college students recalled nonfiction better after reading it on paper than on a computer screen, with electronic tablets intermediate between the two; however, recall was higher in more experienced tablet users (Chen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundVezzali, L., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2012) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20621 · Cited by 125 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Engagement with fiction is thought to simulate social contact (Mar & Oatley, 2008), improve the ability to understand others’ thoughts and feelings (Kidd & Castano, 2013; Johnson, 2012; Mar et al., 2008) and reduce prejudice (Johnson et al., 2013b; Vezzali et al., 2012).”
BackgroundJohnson, D. R., Jasper, D. M., Griffin, S., & Huffman, B. L. (2013) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.578 · Cited by 119 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Other studies (Djikic et al, 2013; Johnson et al., 2013b) also have found that reading enhanced empathy only in those with lower starting points.”
BackgroundResultThe art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self.
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0037999 · Cited by 114 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.”
BackgroundInfluentialUsing E-readers and Internet Resources to Support Comprehension
Wright, S., Fugett, A. D., & Caputa, F. (2013) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 83 · see citing works
The Five‐Factor Model in Fact and Fiction
McCrae, R. R., Gaines, J. F., & Wellington, M. A. (2012) · Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop205004 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
(2014) · Journal of European Psychology Students · doi:10.5334/jeps.ca · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Nomura, K., & Akai, S. (2012) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/02.07.09.11.pr0.110.1.304-314 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
(2013) · Journal of Consciousness Studies · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Barnyak, N. C., & McNelly, T. A. (2016) · Early Childhood Education Journal · doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0735-0 · Cited by 30 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Most studies report high student interest in e-books (e.g. Barnyak & McNelly, 2015; Goodwyn, 2014; Huang, Liang & Chui, 2013), but it is unclear whether this enthusiasm translates into more careful reading or better understanding.”
BackgroundThe Digitization of Literary Reading: Contributions from Empirical Research
Mangen, A. (2016) · Orbis Litterarum · doi:10.1111/oli.12095 · Cited by 26 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The complex relationship between gender, technology, and reading requires more research by both literary specialists and behavioral scientists (Mangen, 2016).”
BackgroundGoodwyn, A. (2013) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2013.768960 · Cited by 12 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Most studies report high student interest in e-books (e.g. Barnyak & McNelly, 2015; Goodwyn, 2014; Huang, Liang & Chui, 2013), but it is unclear whether this enthusiasm translates into more careful reading or better understanding.”
BackgroundThe Wonder of Empathy: Using Palacio’s Novel to Teach Perspective Taking
Guarisco, M., & Freeman, L. (2015) · The ALAN Review · doi:10.21061/alan.v43i1.a.6 · Cited by 8 · cited 6× · see citing works
“In addition, this finding eliminates the possibility that the students in the previous study, who were atypical in lacking the expected gender differences in empathy (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015) were also atypical in their response to Wonder.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationFostering Inclusion of Disabled Youth through Young Adult Literature: Action Research with Wonder
Hayn, J. A., Clemmons, K. R., & Olvey, H. A. (2016) · Study and Scrutiny Research on Young Adult Literature · doi:10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2015.1.2.64-78 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature
Hill, C., Pitre, L. A., Bickmore, S., et al. (2020) · Study and Scrutiny Research on Young Adult Literature · doi:10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2020.4.1.i-ii · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Amir, Y., & Sharon, I. (1990). Replication research: A "must" for the scientific advancement of psychology. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 51-69.
- Huang, Y. M., Liang, T. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2013). Gender differences in the reading of e-books: Investigating children's attitudes, reading behaviors and outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 97-110.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Experiencing literature on the e‐reader: the effects of reading narrative texts on screen
Schwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H., & Stocker, G. (2021) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12337 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Further, while the general interest in the text does not seem to depend on the reading medium (Grimshaw, Dungworth, McKnight, & Morris, 2007; Moyer, 2011), the effect of the reading medium on empathy and theory of mind are also ambiguous (Mangen & Kuiken, 2014; Guarisco et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSchwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Stocker, G. (2020) · Orbis Litterarum · doi:10.1111/oli.12271 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Improving Empathy of Occupational Therapy Students Through Reading Literary Narratives
Kelly, C. (2022) · Journal of Occupational Therapy Education · doi:10.26681/jote.2022.060404 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“It is also significant that unlike prior studies, the RMET was not given to study participants directly after a literary narrative reading (Bal & Veltkamp 2013; Djikie et al., 2013; Guarisco et al., 2017; Mar et al., 2006; Mar et al., 2009; Mumper & Gerrig, 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialShephard, M. T., & Garrison, K. (2024) · School Libraries Worldwide · doi:10.29173/slw8714 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kelly, C. (2022) · Occupational Therapy In Health Care · doi:10.1080/07380577.2022.2161116
“In specific, extensive quantitative research has linked the reading of literary narratives to improved levels of empathy (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013; Djikic et al., 2013; Guarisco et al., 2017; Mar et al., 2006, 2009; Mumper & Gerrig, 2017).”
BackgroundShephard, M. T., & Garrison, K. (2023) · IASL Annual Conference Proceedings · doi:10.29173/iasl8773
“Empirical studies show behavioral change after reading fictional literature including increased empathy and pro-social behaviors as well as improved social cognitive skills (Deshpande, 2012; Guarisco et al., 2017; Johnson, 2012).”
BackgroundA Content Analysis of Research in Young Adult Literature
Darragh, J. J., & Boyd, A. S. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191945540.003.0040
Mathur, P. (2026) · Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association · doi:10.1080/24750158.2026.2650896
- Authors
- Guarisco, M. S., Brooks, C., & Freeman, L. M.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Mary Baldwin University (US)
- ORCID
- Brooks, Celine
- Venue
- Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature
- Publisher
- University of Oklahoma Libraries
- Published
- 2017-09-20
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 24-54
- ISSN
- 2376-5275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766014342
- Semantic Scholar
- f3533b42167653621691532d78548da42b5a305e
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Study and Scrutiny Research on Young Adult Literature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation (University of Oklahoma) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- empathy, theory of mind, perspective taking, concern for others, facial expression recognition, reading formats, print versus digital reading, young adult literature, gender differences, sixth grade students, socio-cognitive skills, children's literature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review