Cited by 8Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentThemes in Literature AnalysisLiteracy and Educational Practices

Reading Books and Reading Minds: Differential Effects of Wonder and The Crossover on Empathy and Theory of Mind

Open access
Guarisco, Martha S., Brooks, Celine, Freeman, Louise M.·2017·Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature

Abstract

We tested sixth graders for empathy and theory of mind before and after an academic unit on either Wonder or The Crossover. Wonder was associated with improved perspective-taking; students who read The Crossover increased in concern for others. Faux pas detection increased in both genders with Wonder, and in girls with The Crossover. Students who read The Crossover in print showed improved understanding of facial expressions, while students who used iPads declined. Young adult fiction is associated with improved social cognitive skills, but effects depend on gender and reading format, as well as on the choice of individual book.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a pre-post study of 78 sixth graders reading either *Wonder* or *The Crossover* during a 5-week unit, both books were associated with improved empathy and theory of mind, but specific gains differed by book, gender, and reading format. *Wonder* was linked to perspective-taking and faux-pas detection, while *The Crossover* was linked to empathic concern, with print versus iPad reading affecting facial-expression understanding.

Key findings

  • *Wonder* was associated with increased Perspective Taking; *The Crossover* was associated with increased Empathic Concern. Boys had a larger Perspective Taking increase after *Wonder* (16.4%) than girls (2.2%), while girls reading *The Crossover* showed a slight, marginally significant decline in Perspective Taking (3.6%, p = 0.062).
  • Faux pas detection increased after *Wonder* in both genders (32.98% increase); after *The Crossover*, the increase was smaller (20.8%) and restricted to girls.
  • On the Eyes-C theory of mind test, *Wonder* readers showed no change. For *The Crossover*, students reading print improved in reading emotions from eyes, while students using iPads declined; this format effect was the same in both genders.
  • Baseline gender differences appeared: girls scored higher than boys on Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking. Boys reported more engagement with iPads and girls more engagement with traditional books; 57/78 students chose *The Crossover*, and 33 reported reading digital versus 45 print.

Methods

  • Pre-post within-subjects design during a 5-week academic unit beginning September 2015. Participants were 89 sixth-grade students from the Episcopal School of Baton Rouge, Louisiana; 78 (41 M, 37 F) provided usable data. Students chose *Wonder* or *The Crossover*; classes were assigned to print, iPad, or choice of format.
  • Measures: Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) subscales Empathic Concern, Perspective Taking, and Fantasy Scale (7 items each, 5-point Likert, maximum 35); Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test for Children (Eyes-C; 28 items, maximum 28); and Faux Pas Test for Children (FP-C; 5 faux pas and 5 control stories, maximum 5 each). Baseline testing occurred before reading; post-unit testing occurred about one week after reading finished.
  • Analysis: baseline differences were evaluated with three-way between-subjects ANOVA for gender, book choice, and anticipated reading format. Post-unit changes were assessed with four-way mixed-design ANOVA, with data analyzed separately for *Wonder* and *The Crossover* readers.

Limitations

  • The paper states that classroom-based research makes it difficult to separate effects of the specific text from other classroom activities, though it argues book-specific changes make text exposure likely; it also cannot rule out book-specific classroom sub-environments. The *Wonder* group was too small to detect a gender-by-format interaction (only four boys and four girls read *Wonder* on iPad). How long improved social cognition persisted is unknown. Low minority participation meant race effects were not quantified. Anonymous assessments prevented linking individual Fantasy Scale scores to academic outcomes. Last-minute changes assigned additional students to digital reading, so format was not fully chosen or randomized.
  • Evident from the text: book choice was self-selected, creating possible selection effects; the sample came from one school and one teacher, limiting generalizability; there was no non-reading control group; and empathy was measured by self-report.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2017.3.1.24-54

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

8 of 54 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationreasoning

    This finding eliminates the possibility that the students in the previous study, who were atypical in lacking the expected gender differences in empathy, were also atypical in their response to Wonder.

    “In addition, this finding eliminates the possibility that the students in the previous study, who were atypical in lacking the expected gender differences in empathy (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015) were also atypical in their response to Wonder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source

      The available article passages (pp. 56–57) describe improved empathy scores after the Wonder unit but do not report whether the students lacked the expected gender differences in empathy. I searched the indexed copy for gender differences and baseline comparisons; the matching description says outcomes were identical across genders, which does not establish that baseline empathy lacked a gender difference. The claim that a later finding eliminates a possibility is the citing authors’ inference, not the point this citation is asked to support. (LLM, conf=0.67)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    After the unit, students reported more inclination to examine situations from another's point of view.

    “After the unit, students reported more inclination to examine situations from another's point of view, an important social skill for reducing conflict and improving understanding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source
  • Premisecitation

    We previously reported that sixth graders' perspective-taking skills increased after a 5-week reading unit on Wonder.

    “We previously reported (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015) that sixth graders' perspective-taking skills increased after a 5-week reading unit on Wonder (Palacio, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source

      The paper’s description reports that sixth graders improved in perspective taking after an academic unit combining Wonder with lessons and an empathy-building activity. The cited passage on p. 56 also reports improved empathy-assessment scores after the unit. Our copy does not establish the claimed five-week duration (searched: “five weeks” and “5-week reading unit”). (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    After the Wonder unit, we observed a small but significant increase in one empathy subscale: Perspective Taking.

    “After the Wonder unit, we observed a small but significant increase in one empathy subscale: Perspective Taking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source

      The paper’s description says that sixth-grade students improved in perspective taking after an academic unit on Wonder, and the introduction (p. 56) reports improved empathy-assessment scores. The passages available from our copy do not establish that the increase was small or statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    We replicated the empathy increase after reading Wonder.

    “We replicated the empathy increase after reading Wonder and extended them to a second book, The Crossover (Alexander, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 54
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 56
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The increase in Perspective Taking after reading Wonder replicates our previous study, even though the current sample was much smaller.

    “The increase in Perspective Taking after reading Wonder replicates our previous study (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015), even though the current sample was much smaller.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guarisco & Freeman, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chinese college students recalled nonfiction better after reading it on paper than on a computer screen, with electronic tablets intermediate between the two; however, recall was higher in more experienced tablet users.

    “Chinese college students recalled nonfiction better after reading it on paper than on a computer screen, with electronic tablets intermediate between the two; however, recall was higher in more experienced tablet users (Chen et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2014 source

      The Participants (p. 5) and Reading materials (p. 6) sections describe Chinese college students reading expository texts. The Discussion (p. 8) reports tablet scores between paper and computer scores, while the Results (p. 7) find higher summarization scores among highly familiar tablet users. But the paper measured comprehension through multiple-choice questions and summaries, not recall as such; only the paper–computer difference on multiple-choice comprehension was statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Classroom activities presumably encouraged extended and deeper reflection about the text, which may have helped psychosocial changes develop and persist.

    “Classroom activities presumably encouraged extended and deeper reflection about the text, which may have helped psychosocial changes develop and persist (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bal & Veltkamp, 2013 source

      The Introduction’s “Sleeper Effects of Fiction on Outcomes” section proposes that time to rethink and relive a story can allow changes in empathy to emerge. The General Discussion likewise describes reflection during an incubation period. Neither passage addresses classroom activities or shows that they encouraged deeper reflection, so that part of the attributed explanation is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Mental transport into fiction is necessary for social benefits.

    “Since mental transport into fiction is necessary for social benefits (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013;Johnson 2012;Johnson et al., 2013a), our Fantasy Scale results suggest that effects of fiction could depend on what reading format students use, or anticipate using.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bal & Veltkamp, 2013 source

      The Introduction proposes that fiction enhances empathy only when readers are emotionally transported, and the Conclusion reports that low transportation was related to lower empathy while high transportation might be related to higher empathy (page unavailable). This supports the claim for empathy, but the paper does not establish that transportation is necessary for social benefits generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Johnson 2012 source
    • cites Johnson et al., 2013a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The two books had different effects, and both gender and book format modulated the effect of reading.

    “However, the two books had different effects, and both gender and book format modulated the effect of reading.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For students who read The Crossover, the increase in faux pas scores was smaller (20.8%) than for Wonder (32.98%) and was restricted to girls.

    “For students who read The Crossover, the increase in faux pas scores was smaller (20.8% compared to Wonder's 32.98%) and restricted to girls (Fig 3b).”
    • Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
      “For The Crossover, the increase was smaller and restricted to girls.”
    • Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
      “For students reading The Crossover, the increase in faux pas detection bordered on significance and was restricted to girls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Girls continued to have higher Fantasy Scale scores with traditional print, while boys had higher scores with iPads.

    “Fantasy Scale scores did not change significantly post-unit, but girls continued to have higher scores with traditional print, while boys had higher scores with iPads.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither gender nor reading format made a difference in the effect of The Crossover unit on Empathic Concern.

    “Neither gender nor reading format made a difference in the effect of The Crossover unit on Empathic Concern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Boys' Perspective-Taking scores were unchanged after completing the Crossover unit, while girls' trended downward slightly.

    “Boys' Perspective-Taking scores were unchanged after completing the Crossover unit, while girls' trended downward slightly (Fig 2c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Even though boys felt more mentally engaged when using iPads, they declined in sensitivity to facial expressions.

    “Thus, even though boys felt more mentally engaged when using iPads, they declined in sensitivity to facial expressions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scores on faux pas questions, but not control questions, increased significantly after the Wonder unit.

    “Scores on the faux pas, but not control questions, increased significantly after the Wonder unit (Fig 3a).”
    • Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
      “Scores on faux pas recognition questions, but not control questions, increased in students who read Wonder, suggesting that this academic unit specifically increased the ability to detect social gaffes caused by missing or incorrect information.”
    • Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
      “The ability to detect faux pas increased in both genders after reading Wonder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the Crossover group, Eyes-C scores improved only in students reading print; students using iPads declined on this measure.

    “In the Crossover group, Eyes-C scores improved only in the students reading print; students using iPads actually declined on this measure (Fig 3c).”
    • Also stated in: § CONCLUSIONS · plain
      “For The Crossover, this ability increased in students who read the book in print, but decreased in students who used iPads.”
    • Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
      “Those reading print form improved in their ability to interpret emotions from pictures of eyes, while those using iPads went down on that measure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Baseline Fantasy Scale scores were similar for both book groups, but depended on both gender and the format that the students anticipated reading.

    “Baseline Fantasy Scale scores were similar for both book groups, but depended on both gender and the format that the students anticipated reading.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perspective Taking's failure to increase in the Crossover readers - and even slight decline (3.6%) in girls - may initially seem puzzling.

    “Therefore, Perspective Taking's failure to increase in the Crossover readers -and even slight decline (3.6%) in girls (Fig 2c.)-may initially seem puzzling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Changes in faux pas scores after reading Wonder were the same in both genders and with both reading formats.

    “Changes after reading were the same in both genders and with both reading formats.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Small group discussions on socioeconomic class were superficial, but students were more open to sharing in the whole class with the teacher facilitating.

    “While the small group discussions on this topic were superficial, students were much more open to sharing in the whole class, with the teacher facilitating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The slight decrease in girls' Perspective Taking after reading The Crossover was offset by gains in Empathic Concern comparable to the boys' and trends in improved faux pas detection that boys did not show.

    “The slight decrease in girls' Perspective Taking was offset by gains in Empathic Concern that were comparable to the boys', and trends in improved faux pas detection that boys did not show (Fig. 3b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of students who did not choose The Crossover for their novel study subsequently read it independently, largely because the book generated positive buzz.

    “The majority of the students who did not choose The Crossover for their novel study subsequently read it independently, in large part because the book generated so much positive buzz.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    During group work, students re-read the section in which a police officer pulls over Josh's father, and Josh is clearly nervous that the situation could escalate.

    “During group work, students re-read the section in which a police officer pulls over Josh's father, and Josh is clearly nervous that the situation could escalate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    While completing their character-in-a-bag projects, several Caucasian students did not realize that the protagonists were African-American.

    “While completing their character-in-a-bag projects, several Caucasian students did not realize that the protagonists were African-American.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Students showed increases in both empathy and theory of mind after the unit.

    “Students showed increases in both empathy and theory of mind after the unit, suggesting that these two young adult books have social benefits similar to literary fiction for adults.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Understanding the role of class conflict in Jack's character development required frank discussion of socioeconomic class and how it feels to be surrounded by students with lavish lifestyles.

    “Understanding the role of class conflict in Jack's character development required frank discussion of socioeconomic class and how it feels to be surrounded by students with lavish lifestyles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Specific effects depended on the book: Wonder was associated with higher Perspective Taking, and The Crossover with higher Empathic Concern.

    “Specific effects depended on the book, with Wonder associated with higher Perspective Taking and The Crossover with higher Empathic Concern.”
    • Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
      “For students who read Wonder, only Perspective Taking increased after the unit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    All changes in empathy and theory of mind occurred over a 5-week period and were present a week after reading was complete.

    “All changes in empathy and theory of mind occurred over a 5-week period and were present a week after reading was complete.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Groups assigned to follow the twins' mother struggled to find relevant quotes and items to include in their character bag.

    “Groups assigned to follow the twins' mother struggled to find relevant quotes and items to include in their character bag.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Students were eager to tackle the conversation about socioeconomic class, mentioning extravagant birthday parties and international travel.

    “Surprisingly, students were eager to tackle this conversation, mentioning extravagant birthday parties and international travel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Girls had significantly higher baseline scores than boys in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking, but not in the other four measures.

    “Girls had significantly higher baseline scores than boys in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking, but not in the other four measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Most students did not realize the significance of the police officer pulling over Josh's father.

    “Most students did not realize the significance of this seemingly minor detail.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    There was no relationship between gender and book choice.

    “There was no relationship between gender and book choice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Losing track of place and awkwardness could have reduced connection to the narrative in our readers.

    “Both effects could have reduced connection to the narrative in our readers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Because of the low number of minority participants, we did not quantify effects of race.

    “Because of the low number of minority participants, we did not quantify effects of race.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test for Children (Eyes-C) is a well-validated theory of mind test for children that measures the ability to infer emotional state from a picture of the eyes.

    “This is a wellvalidated theory of mind test for children that measures the ability to infer emotional state from a picture of the eyes (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baron-Cohen et al., 2001
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    An alternate explanation is that the stronger boy and weaker girl readers were placed, by chance, in the digital group, and that the stronger readers are also more caught up in fiction.

    “An alternate explanation is that the stronger boy and weaker girl readers were placed, by chance, in the digital group, and that the stronger readers are also more caught up in fiction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Young adult fiction is associated with improved social cognitive skills, but effects depend on gender and reading format, as well as on the choice of individual book.

    “Young adult fiction is associated with improved social cognitive skills, but effects depend on gender and reading format, as well as on the choice of individual book.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mangen and Kuiken (2014) also found that even experienced iPad readers were more likely to lose track of their place in the text and to report awkwardness when using the device.

    “Mangen and Kuiken (2014) also found that even experienced iPad readers were more likely to lose track of their place in the text and to report awkwardness when using the device.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mangen and Kuiken (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Faux Pas Test for Children (FP-C) requires recognizing faux pas: social errors caused by false belief.

    “This theory of mind test requires recognizing faux pas: social errors caused by false belief (Baron-Cohen et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baron-Cohen et al., 1999 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) is an established measure of empathy.

    “The IRI is an established measure of empathy (Davis, 1981).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davis, 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A study of Chinese sixth graders reading science texts on electronic tablets found that girls recalled the material better and were more likely to use note-taking applications than boys; boys were more likely to be distracted by drawing and game tools.

    “A study of Chinese sixth graders reading science texts on electronic tablets found that girls recalled the material better and were more likely to use note-taking applications than boys; boys were more likely to be distracted by drawing and game tools (Huang et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Readers may respond differently to Wonder's narrative prose than to The Crossover's verse.

    “Second, readers may respond differently to Wonder's narrative prose than to The Crossover's verse.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Margolin, Driscoll, Toland and Kegler (2013) found no difference between computer, e-reader, or print reading comprehension in U.S. college students who routinely used educational technology.

    “Margolin, Driscoll, Toland and Kegler (2013) found no difference between computer, e-reader, or print reading comprehension in U.S. college students who routinely used educational technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Margolin, Driscoll, Toland and Kegler (2013) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Scores on the adult version of the Eyes-C test show improvement after reading literary fiction.

    “Scores on the adult version of this test show improvement after reading literary fiction (Kidd & Castano, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kidd & Castano, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increase in Eyes-C score with print and decrease with iPad suggests changes are related to the reading experience, because classroom activities were virtually identical for these two groups.

    “Similarly, an increase in Eyes-C score with print and a decrease with iPad suggests changes are related to the reading experience; classroom activities would have been virtually identical for these two groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This increase in emotional projection is associated with higher willingness to help others, agreeableness, and openness.

    “While this increase is associated with higher willingness to help others, agreeableness, and openness, this fondness for fantasy is also associated with social anxiety and emotional instability in teens (Hawk et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hawk et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Direct experience with multiple literary perspectives may draw more attention to the benefits of adopting another's perspective in a real-life conflict.

    “Direct experience with multiple literary perspectives may draw more attention to the benefits of adopting another's perspective in a real-life conflict.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Emotional projection into fiction increases in both genders.

    “Emotional projection into fiction also increases in both genders (Hawk et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hawk et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    This is evidence that Wonder attracted the more empathic girls, but the less empathic boys.

    “This is evidence that Wonder attracted the more empathic girls, but the less empathic boys.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increase in ability to detect faux pas may have been larger with Wonder because Wonder includes several examples of social gaffes similar to the FP-C examples.

    “The increase in ability to detect faux pas may have been larger with Wonder because it includes several examples of social gaffes similar to the FP-C examples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Djikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.

    “Djikic and Oatley (2014) have proposed that simulated social contact within fiction induces temporary, individualized fluctuations in personality that facilitate more long-term change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Djikic and Oatley (2014) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Recent studies suggest that emotional transport into stories may be reduced in digital media.

    “Recent studies (Mangen & Kuiken, 2014;Mangen, 2016) suggest that emotional transport into stories may be reduced in digital media.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mangen & Kuiken, 2014 source
    • cites Mangen, 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent psychology research has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.

    “Recent psychology research (Djikic & Oatley, 2014, review) has documented social as well as academic benefits from reading fiction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Djikic & Oatley, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    This fondness for fantasy is associated with social anxiety and emotional instability in teens.

    “While this increase is associated with higher willingness to help others, agreeableness, and openness, this fondness for fantasy is also associated with social anxiety and emotional instability in teens (Hawk et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hawk et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Kidd and Castano (2013) found that only literary, not popular fiction, improved theory of mind in adults.

    “Kidd and Castano (2013) found that only literary, not popular fiction, improved theory of mind in adults; whether that distinction is meaningful for younger readers is unknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kidd and Castano (2013) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The iPads benefited boys, improving both reading engagement and performance, while having the opposite effect in girls.

    “This raises the intriguing possibility that, in our students, the iPads benefited boys, improving both reading engagement and performance, while having the opposite effect in girls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Students identified their tests with school passwords to assure anonymity while allowing comparison of individual scores before and after the unit.

    “To assure anonymity, while also allowing comparison of individual scores before and after the unit, students identified their tests with school passwords.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Barnyak and McNelly (2015) found that early elementary students independently using e-readers for nonfiction texts recalled details better than those using print; however, neither group performed as well as a group reading the print books with teacher support.

    “Barnyak and McNelly (2015) found that early elementary students independently using e-readers for nonfiction texts recalled details better than those using print; however, neither group performed as well as a group reading the print books with teacher support.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barnyak and McNelly (2015) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Wonder's multiple narrators require considering the story from different viewpoints, while The Crossover is told only in Josh's voice.

    “One key difference is that Wonder's multiple narrators require considering the story from different viewpoints, while The Crossover is told only in Josh's voice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent functional MRI studies found that poetry and prose activated different brain regions, with poetry more likely to stimulate brain areas involved in emotional responses to music and introspection.

    “Recent functional MRI studies found that poetry and prose activated different brain regions, with poetry more likely to stimulate brain areas involved in emotional responses to music and introspection (Zeman, Milton, Smith & Rylance, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeman, Milton, Smith & Rylance, 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of change in Eyes-C in the Wonder group may be because of smaller sample size.

    “No change in ability to infer emotions from eyes was seen in the Wonder group, perhaps because of smaller sample size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Johnson (2012) found that reading and mentally engaging with a short story increased college students' sensitivity to fearful facial expressions, along with empathy and altruism.

    “Johnson (2012) found that reading and mentally engaging with a short story increased college students' sensitivity to fearful facial expressions, along with empathy and altruism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Johnson (2012) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Unlike previous experiments that examined immediate effects, our study tested students a week after they finished reading the novel.

    “However, both of those experiments examined immediate effects; in our study, testing was a week after the students finished reading the novel.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mary Baldwin University, and parents gave informed consent while students gave written assent.

    “Parents gave informed consent for student participation, while the students gave written assent.The school principal gave permission for the study and the Institutional Review Board of Mary Baldwin University approved all psychological testing procedures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several teams have reported increased tolerance after multi-week behavioral interventions involving reading and discussing stories about stigmatized groups.

    “While several teams (e.g.Cameron & Rutland, 2006; Cameron, Rutland, Brown & Douch, 2006; Vezzali, Stathi & Giovannini, 2012; Vezzali et al., 2014) have reported increased tolerance after multi-week behavioral interventions involving reading and discussing stories about stigmatized groups, it is not clear to what extent such interventions contribute to the schools' academic goals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cameron & Rutland, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Cameron, Rutland, Brown & Douch, 2006 source
    • cites Vezzali, Stathi & Giovannini, 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    We measured empathy for real-life acquaintances, not for the characters in the reading, and our students' assessments occurred a week after reading completion rather than immediately.

    “However, we measured empathy for real-life acquaintances, not for the characters in the reading, and our students' assessments occurred a week after reading completion, rather than immediately.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.

    “The improvement developed over a 5-week period of classroom study, and was present a week after reading ended, so it resembles the type of intermediate-term effect that Djikic and Oatley (2014) cite as missing from most studies of the prosocial effects of fiction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Djikic and Oatley (2014) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because our psychological assessments were collected anonymously, it was not possible to connect individual students' reported Fantasy Scale scores to academic outcome.

    “Because our psychological assessments were collected anonymously, it was not possible to connect individual students' reported Fantasy Scale scores to academic outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Researchers have found consistent gender differences in IRI scores by age 13.

    “Researchers have found consistent gender differences in IRI scores by age 13 (Hawk et al, 2014;Van der Graaf et al., 2013), although we did not see such differences in our previous Wonder study (Guarisco & Freeman, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hawk et al, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Van der Graaf et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reading literary, but not popular, fiction is associated with increases in the ability to infer emotions from pictures of eyes in adults.

    “Reading literary, but not popular, fiction is associated with increases in the ability to infer emotions from pictures of eyes in adults (Kidd & Castano, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kidd & Castano, 2013 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Engagement with fiction is thought to simulate social contact, improve the ability to understand others' thoughts and feelings, and reduce prejudice.

    “Engagement with fiction is thought to simulate social contact (Mar & Oatley, 2008), improve the ability to understand others' thoughts and feelings (Kidd & Castano, 2013;Johnson, 2012;Mar et al., 2008) and reduce prejudice (Johnson et al., 2013b;Vezzali et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mar & Oatley, 2008 source
    • cites Kidd & Castano, 2013 source
    • cites Johnson, 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Prose may enhance empathy on a cognitive level, while verse acts on a more emotional mechanism.

    “Prose may enhance empathy on a cognitive level, while verse acts on a more emotional mechanism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some empathic tendencies (concern for others, adopting another's viewpoint) increase in girls, but decrease in boys, amplifying already existing gender differences.

    “Some empathic tendencies (concern for others, adopting another's viewpoint) increase in girls, but decrease in boys, amplifying already existing gender differences (Van der Graaf et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van der Graaf et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Eleven children failed to complete both surveys or provided non-matching codes, leaving 78 participants (41 M, 37 F) with usable data.

    “Eleven children failed to complete both surveys or provided non-matching codes, leaving 78 participants (41 M, 37 F) with usable data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A year of acting classes at age 14 increased both empathy and theory of mind skills; comparable lessons in music or art did not.

    “For example, a year of acting classes at age 14 increased both empathy and theory of mind skills; comparable lessons in music or art did not (Goldstein & Winner, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldstein & Winner, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Mangen and Kuiken (2014), the differences between paper and iPad were present only in the group that believed they were reading nonfiction; reading format did not affect narrative engagement when readers believed the story was fiction.

    “However, these differences were present only in the group that believed they were reading nonfiction; reading format did not affect narrative engagement when readers believed the story was fiction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mangen and Kuiken (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Most studies report high student interest in e-books.

    “Most studies report high student interest in e-books (e.g.Barnyak & McNelly, 2015; Goodwyn, 2014; Huang, Liang & Chui, 2013), but it is unclear whether this enthusiasm translates into more careful reading or better understanding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Barnyak & McNelly, 2015 source
    • cites Goodwyn, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Huang, Liang & Chui, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gender differences in Eyes-C scores have been reported in early adolescence.

    “Gender differences in Eyes-C scores (Baron-Cohen et al., 1999) have been reported in early adolescence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baron-Cohen et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The Wonder group was too small to detect an interaction effect of gender and reading format; only four boys and four girls read Wonder on the iPad.

    “The Wonder group was too small to expect to be able to detect an interaction effect of gender and reading format; only four boys and four girls read Wonder on the iPad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The decline in Perspective Taking in girls who read The Crossover could be related to the relative lack of female characters.

    “The reason for the decline is unclear, but could be related to the relative lack of female characters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Johnson's (2013a) short-term study of college students, guided imagery generation was necessary for a short story to have empathy-enhancing effects; no increase was seen in students instructed to read the story as they would for leisure.

    “In Johnson's (2013a) short-term study of college students, guided imagery generation was necessary for a short story to have empathy-enhancing effects; no increase was seen in students instructed to read the story as they would for leisure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Johnson's (2013a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The Crossover lacked the explicit social gaffe object lessons of Wonder, which was associated with improved faux pas detection in both genders.

    “The Crossover lacked the explicit social gaffe object lessons of Wonder, which was associated with improved faux pas detection in both genders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The Crossover boys began with higher Perspective Taking than Wonder boys, which may have contributed to the lack of measurable improvement.

    “The Crossover boys began with higher Perspective Taking than Wonder boys, which may have contributed to the lack of measurable improvement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Boys may have focused more on the act of physical aggression that was a key plot point in The Crossover.

    “Boys may have focused more on the act of physical aggression that was a key plot point in that book.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Baron-Cohen et al. (1999) reported that girls outscore boys on faux pas detection between the ages of 7 and 11.

    “Although Baron-Cohen et al. (1999) reported that girls outscore boys on faux pas detection between the ages of 7 and 11, we saw no such gender difference at the beginning of our study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baron-Cohen et al. (1999) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This could lead girls to more carefully consider interpersonal interactions where someone could be unintentionally hurt emotionally, and thereby glean more theory of mind skills from The Crossover.

    “This could lead girls to more carefully consider interpersonal interactions where someone could be unintentionally hurt emotionally, and thereby glean more theory of mind skills from The Crossover.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The efforts to introduce sixth graders to studying novels with Wonder and The Crossover were successful both academically and socially.

    “Efforts to introduce sixth graders to studying novels with Wonder and The Crossover were successful both on an academic and social level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Simulated social contact may have been more subtle in the singly narrated poetry of The Crossover.

    “Simulated social contact may have been more subtle in the singly narrated poetry of The Crossover.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Pre-existing personality differences may have affected the children's choice of book, with boys who were lower in empathy preferring Wonder.

    “Pre-existing personality differences may have affected the children's choice of book, with boys who were lower in empathy preferring Wonder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Girls may have better related to the well-developed and similarly-aged female characters of Wonder than to Josh's mother, who is also the assistant principal and a dual authority figure.

    “Girls may have better related to the well-developed and similarly-aged female characters of Wonder than to Josh's mother, who is also the assistant principal of his school and therefore a dual authority figure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The within-subjects design, comparing individual students' scores before and after the unit, controls for expected gender differences and other baseline differences related to book selection or reading format.

    “Our within-subjects design, which compares individual students' scores before the unit to those after, controls for expected gender differences and other baseline differences related to book selection or reading format.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
88 of 88
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Few studies have investigated whether young adult literature has prosocial effects on its intended age group.

    “However, few studies have investigated whether young adult literature has prosocial effects on its intended age group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Experimental evidence for effects that fall between immediate and long-term is lacking.

    “Unfortunately, experimental evidence for effects that fall between the two is lacking.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    To date, few researchers have explicitly addressed how students' social attitudes change after studying a piece of fiction.

    “To date, few researchers have explicitly addressed how students' social attitudes change after studying a piece of fiction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Published experiments have focused on reducing specific prejudices rather than increasing general empathy.

    “Published experiments have focused on reducing specific prejudices rather than increasing general empathy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social cognitive skills mature throughout adolescence and remain malleable to environmental factors.

    “Social cognitive skills mature throughout adolescence and remain malleable to environmental factors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Both empathy and theory of mind skills are enhanced by stimulating social environments, even at young ages.

    “Both empathy and theory of mind skills are enhanced by stimulating social environments, even at young ages.”
6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Amir, Y., & Sharon, I. (1990). Replication research: A "must" for the scientific advancement of psychology. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 51-69.
  2. Huang, Y. M., Liang, T. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2013). Gender differences in the reading of e-books: Investigating children's attitudes, reading behaviors and outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 97-110.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guarisco, M. S., Brooks, C., & Freeman, L. M.
Affiliations
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Mary Baldwin University (US)
Venue
Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature
Published
2017-09-20
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
24-54
ISSN
2376-5275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766014342
Cited by
8
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Study and Scrutiny Research on Young Adult Literature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation (University of Oklahoma) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
Keywords
empathy, theory of mind, perspective taking, concern for others, facial expression recognition, reading formats, print versus digital reading, young adult literature, gender differences, sixth grade students, socio-cognitive skills, children's literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review