Cited by 32Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Long-term outcome of patients with bifascicular block and unexplained syncope following cardiac pacing

KALSCHEUR, MATTHEW M., DONATEO, PAOLO, WENZKE, KEVIN E., ASTE, MILENA, ODDONE, DANIELE, SOLANO, ALBERTO, MAGGI, ROBERTO, CROCI, FRANCESCO +3 more·2016·Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to the ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, cardiac pacing is reasonable in patients with bifascicular block (BF-B) and syncope when other causes have been excluded. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of patients with BF-B and unexplained syncope following cardiac pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2015, we identified 43 consecutive patients (mean age of 78 ± 12 years, 64% males) who presented with syncope and BF-B and had received a pacemaker (PM). During a mean follow-up period of 31 ± 21 months, syncope recurred in seven patients (16%): 7% (95% standard error [SE] ± 3%) at 1 year and 18% (95% SE ± 7%) at 5 years. At univariable analysis, the only predictor of syncope recurrence was empiric pacing (P = 0.03). There were no syncope recurrences in the 12 patients who received a PM following a positive electrophysiological study (EPS) and the five patients with documentation of paroxysmal atrioventricular block (AVB) during cardiac monitoring (insertable loop recorder [ILR]), (EPS/ILR Group, n = 17) compared to seven of 26 (27%) patients who received empiric pacing (Empiric Group, n = 26; P = 0.02). Progression to high-degree AVB was documented during follow-up in 16 (37%) patients: nine of 17 (53%) patients in the EPS/ILR Group and seven of 26 (27%) patients in the Empiric Group (P = 0.11). There were no injuries reported during ILR monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that syncope recurs not infrequently in patients with BF-B who received pacing for syncope. Nearly one in four patients who had empiric pacing suffered syncope recurrence compared to no recurrences in patients who received a PM following a positive EPS or documentation of transient AVB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pace.12946

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding has been indirectly confirmed by recent studies that showed a significant reduction in syncopal recurrences in patients with prolonged HV implanted with a pacemaker compared with a control group of untreated patients with a negative EPS, or with a control group who received an empiric pacemaker.

    “This finding has been indirectly confirmed by recent studies that showed a significant reduction in syncopal recurrences in patients with prolonged HV implanted with a pacemaker compared with a control group of untreated patients with a negative EPS 188 , or with a control group who received an empiric pacemaker. 217”
  • Implantation of a pacemaker without documentation of AV block (empirical pacing) exposed patients to the risk of recurrence of syncope in about one-quarter of cases during long-term follow-up and was unnecessary in another half.

    “Conversely, implantation of a pacemaker without documentation of AV block (empirical pacing) exposed patients to the risk of recurrence of syncope in about one-quarter of cases during long-term follow-up and was unnecessary in another half. 217,344”
  • With a strategy of EPS followed by ILR if EPS findings are unremarkable, a pacemaker was implanted in approximately half of patients and these patients had syncope recurrence after pacemaker implantation in 0-7% of cases.

    “With this strategy, a pacemaker was implanted in approximately half of the patients and these patients had syncope recurrence after pacemaker implantation in 0-7% of cases 188,217 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KALSCHEUR, M. M., DONATEO, P., WENZKE, K. E., ASTE, M., ODDONE, D., SOLANO, A., MAGGI, R., CROCI, F., PAGE, R. L., BRIGNOLE, M., & HAMDAN, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Presidio Ospedaliero (IT)
Corresponding author
HAMDAN, MOHAMED H.
Venue
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-22
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
1126-1131
ISSN
  • 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8159
OpenAlex
W2518081770
Cited by
32
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
bifascicular block, syncope, cardiac pacing, pacemaker implantation, syncope recurrence, paroxysmal atrioventricular block, high-grade atrioventricular block, electrophysiological study, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Block, Humans, Male, Recurrence, Syncope, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review