Cited by 33Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Randomized Pragmatic Trial of Pacemaker Versus Implantable Cardiac Monitor in Syncope and Bifascicular Block

Open access
Sheldon, Robert, Talajic, Mario, Tang, Anthony, Becker, Giuliano, Essebag, Vidal, Sultan, Omar, Baranchuk, Adrian, Ritchie, Debbie +6 more·2022·JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

Objectives In this study, the authors tested whether a strategy of empiric permanent pacing reduces major composite events more effectively than acting on the results of an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). Background Syncope may be caused by intermittent complete heart block in patients with bifascicular heart block, but competing diagnoses coexist. Whether empiric permanent pacing or acting on investigative results provides best care is unknown. Methods This was a multinational, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial of patients ≥50 years of age with bifascicular block, preserved left ventricular function, and ≥1 syncope in the preceding year. The primary composite outcome measure comprised cardiovascular death, syncope, bradycardia resulting in pacemaker insertion, and device complications. Results There were 57 and 58 subjects randomized to receive a pacemaker or ICM. A total of 41 patients had left bundle branch block and 74 had right bundle branch block and a left fascicular block. Patients were followed for a median 33 months. There were fewer composite primary outcomes in patients randomized to pacemaker compared with ICM, respectively (20 [35%] vs 44 [76%]; chi square P Conclusions Empiric permanent pacing compared with ICM reduced major adverse events but not syncope in older patients with bifascicular block and recent syncope. There remains a substantial likelihood of syncope recurrence in patients who receive a permanent pacemaker likely caused by vasodepressor syn…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.10.003

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheldon, R., Talajic, M., Tang, A., Becker, G., Essebag, V., Sultan, O., Baranchuk, A., Ritchie, D., Morillo, C., Krahn, A., Brignole, M., Manns, B., Maxey, C., & Raj, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Regina General Hospital (CA)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Presidio Ospedaliero (IT)
Corresponding author
Sheldon, Robert
Venue
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
239-248
ISSN
2405-500X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217147487
Cited by
32
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 111094)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
syncope, bifascicular block, permanent cardiac pacing, implantable cardiac monitors, left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, bradycardia, cardiovascular mortality, device complications, older adults, vasodepressor syncope
MeSH terms
Aged, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bundle-Branch Block, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Humans, Pacemaker, Artificial, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review