Cited by 33Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Lowered parasympathetic activity in apparently healthy subjects with self reported symptoms of pain: preliminary results from a pilot study

Koenig, Julian, Jarczok, Marc N., Ellis, Robert J., Warth, Marco, Hillecke, Thomas K., Thayer, Julian F.·2015·Pain Practice

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate differences in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity, indexed by heart rate variability (HRV) in apparently healthy subjects with self‐reported symptoms of pain (SRSP) within an exploratory analysis. Methods: HRV data from 14 apparently healthy male individuals were analyzed to address potential differences in subjects with and without SRSP. SRSP was assessed using the four pain‐related items from the symptom checklist (SCL‐90R). Subjects were stratified based on the presence of SRSP. Results: Parasympathetic activity, indexed by pNN50, RMSSD, and high frequency (HF) spectrum of HRV, was lower in subjects with SRSP. Low frequency (LF) HRV and the LF/HF ratio were greater in subjects with SRSP. However, analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the groups. Pearson correlations showed a correlation of pNN50, HF, LF, and LF/HF ratio and the presence and frequency of SRSP. Measures of parasympathetic activity (pNN50 and HF) were inversely associated with more SRSP, indicating that subjects with more frequent SRSP show decreased parasympathetic activity. Conclusions: Consistent with evidence on changes in HRV in patients with clinical conditions of chronic or recurrent pain, this is the first study to show that healthy individuals who report symptoms of pain may have lower parasympathetic activity revealed by measures of HRV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papr.12177

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koenig, J., Jarczok, M. N., Ellis, R. J., Warth, M., Hillecke, T. K., & Thayer, J. F.
Affiliations
  • SRH University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Pain Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-27
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
314-318
ISSN
  • 1530-7085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-2500
OpenAlex
W2113301443
Cited by
33
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
parasympathetic activity, heart rate variability, autonomic nervous system, healthy individuals, pNN50, LF/HF ratio, high-frequency HRV, chronic pain, recurrent pain
MeSH terms
Adult, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Pain, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Pilot Projects, Young Adult, Self Report, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review