The DOI matches its Crossref record; 149 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding and engineering beneficial plant–microbe interactions: plant growth promotion in energy crops
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Plant production systems globally must be optimized to produce stable high yields from limited land under changing and variable climates. Demands for food, animal feed, and feedstocks for bioenergy and biorefining applications, are increasing with population growth, urbanization and affluence. Low‐input, sustainable, alternatives to petrochemical‐derived fertilizers and pesticides are required to reduce input costs and maintain or increase yields, with potential biological solutions having an important role to play. In contrast to crops that have been bred for food, many bioenergy crops are largely undomesticated, and so there is an opportunity to harness beneficial plant–microbe relationships which may have been inadvertently lost through intensive crop breeding. Plant–microbe interactions span a wide range of relationships in which one or both of the organisms may have a beneficial, neutral or negative effect on the other partner. A relatively small number of beneficial plant–microbe interactions are well understood and already exploited; however, others remain understudied and represent an untapped reservoir for optimizing plant production. There may be near‐term applications for bacterial strains as microbial biopesticides and biofertilizers to increase biomass yield from energy crops grown on land unsuitable for food production. Longer term aims involve the design of synthetic genetic circuits within and between the host and microbes to optimize plant production. A highly exciting prospect is that endosymbionts comprise a unique resource of reduced complexity microbial genomes with adaptive traits of great interest for a wide variety of applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code
Fowler, M. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45672-4_31 · Cited by 5,591
Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions
Dodds, P. N., & Rathjen, J. P. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2812 · Cited by 3,424
Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome
Lundberg, D. S., Lebeis, S. L., Paredes, S. H., Yourstone, S., Gehring, J., Malfatti, S., Tremblay, J., Engelbrektson, A., Kunin, V., Rio, T. G. D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11237 · Cited by 2,879
Abeles, F. B. (1973) · Cited by 2,876
Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota
Bulgarelli, D., Rott, M., Schlaeppi, K., Ver Loren van Themaat, E., Ahmadinejad, N., Assenza, F., Rauf, P., Huettel, B., Reinhardt, R., Schmelzer, E., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11336 · Cited by 2,544
SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA
van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 · Cited by 2,361
Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world
Glick, B. R. (2014) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009 · Cited by 2,223
Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling
Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Remans, R. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x · Cited by 1,954
Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress
Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C.-M. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 · Cited by 1,852
Cited by
Enabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement of microbiomes
Trivedi, P., Mattupalli, C., Eversole, K., & Leach, J. E. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17319 · Cited by 348
Linking Soil Microbial Diversity to Modern Agriculture Practices: A Review
Gupta, A., Singh, U. B., Sahu, P. K., Paul, S., Kumar, A., Malviya, D., Singh, S., Kuppusamy, P., Singh, P., Paul, D., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19053141 · Cited by 269
Khan, A. L., Halo, B. A., Elyassi, A., Ali, S., Al-Hosni, K., Hussain, J., Al-Harrasi, A., & Lee, I.-J. (2016) · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.02.001 · Cited by 266
Economic and environmental assessment of seed and rhizome propagated Miscanthus in the UK
Hastings, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01058 · Cited by 88
Increased nitrogen use efficiency in crop production can provide economic and environmental benefits
Langholtz, M., Davison, B. H., Jager, H. I., Eaton, L., Baskaran, L. M., Davis, M., & Brandt, C. C. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143602 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrar, K., Bryant, D., & Cope‐Selby, N.
- Venue
- Plant Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1193-1206
- ISSN
- 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7652
- OpenAlex
- W2121111671
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 149
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding and engineering beneficial plant–microbe interactions: plant growth promotion in energy crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.12279
- The paper
- Farrar, K., Bryant, D., & Cope‐Selby, N. (2014). Understanding and engineering beneficial plant–microbe interactions: plant growth promotion in energy crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
