Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 486

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene Cs LOB 1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker

Open access
Jia, Hongge, Zhang, Yunzeng, Orbović, Vladimir, Xu, Jin, White, Frank F., Jones, Jeffrey B., Wang, Nian·2017·Plant Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Citrus is a highly valued tree crop worldwide, while, at the same time, citrus production faces many biotic challenges, including bacterial canker and Huanglongbing (HLB). Breeding for disease‐resistant varieties is the most efficient and sustainable approach to control plant diseases. Traditional breeding of citrus varieties is challenging due to multiple limitations, including polyploidy, polyembryony, extended juvenility and long crossing cycles. Targeted genome editing technology has the potential to shorten varietal development for some traits, including disease resistance. Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9/sg RNA technology to modify the canker susceptibility gene Cs LOB 1 in Duncan grapefruit. Six independent lines, D LOB2, D LOB3, D LOB9, D LOB10, D LOB11 and D LOB12, were generated. Targeted next‐generation sequencing of the six lines showed the mutation rate was 31.58%, 23.80%, 89.36%, 88.79%, 46.91% and 51.12% for D LOB2, D LOB3, D LOB9, D LOB10, D LOB11 and D LOB12, respectively, of the cells in each line. D LOB2 and D LOB3 showed canker symptoms similar to wild‐type grapefruit, when inoculated with the pathogen Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc). No canker symptoms were observed on D LOB9, D LOB10, D LOB11 and D LOB12 at 4 days postinoculation (DPI) with Xcc. Pustules caused by Xcc were observed on D LOB9, D LOB10, D LOB11 and D LOB12 in later stages, which were much reduced compared to that on wild‐type grapefruit. The pustules on D LOB9 and D LOB10 did not develop into typical canker symptoms. No side effects and off‐target mutations were detected in the mutated plants. This study indicates that genome editing using CRISPR technology will provide a promising pathway to generate disease‐resistant citrus varieties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.12677

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 486

Metadata

Authors
Jia, H., Zhang, Y., Orbović, V., Xu, J., White, F. F., Jones, J. B., & Wang, N.
Venue
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-04
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
817-823
ISSN
  • 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7652
OpenAlex
W2559846411
Cited by
486
References
17
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene Cs LOB 1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.12677
The paper
Jia, H., Zhang, Y., Orbović, V., Xu, J., White, F. F., Jones, J. B., & Wang, N. (2017). Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene Cs LOB 1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12677

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.