CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 619

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review

Jaganathan, Deepa, Ramasamy, Karthikeyan, Sellamuthu, Gothandapani, Jayabalan, Shilpha, Venkataraman, Gayatri·2018·Frontiers in Plant Science
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00985PMC PMC6056666
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2018.00985

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ease of use and precise editing provided by CRISPR systems has the potential to reduce costs and breeding time in crop engineering, improving over current genome editing technologies.

    “The ease of use and precise editing provided by CRISPR systems has the potential to reduce costs and breeding time in crop engineering, improving over current genome editing technologies [183].”

    From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [183]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 127

  1. Ali, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants., Genome Biol., 16, 10.1186/s13059-015-0799-6 · DOI
  2. Andersson, 2017, Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts., Plant Cell Rep., 36, 117, 10.1007/s00299-016-2062-3 · DOI
  3. Baltes, 2015, Conferring resistance to geminiviruses with the CRISPR–Cas prokaryotic immune system., Nat. Plants, 1, 10.1038/nplants.2015.145 · DOI
  4. Bertier, 2018, High-resolution analysis of the efficiency, heritability, and editing outcomes of CRISPR-Cas9 -induced modifications of NCED4 in lettuce (Lactuca sativa)., G3, 8, 1513, 10.1534/g3.117.300396 · DOI
  5. Brooks, 2014, Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated9 system., Plant Physiol., 166, 1292, 10.1104/pp.114.247577 · DOI
  6. Butler, 2016, Geminivirus-mediated genome editing in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using sequence-specific nucleases., Front. Plant Sci., 7, 10.3389/fpls.2016.01045 · DOI
  7. Cai, 2018, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmFT2a delays flowering time in soybean., Plant Biotechnol. J., 16, 176, 10.1111/pbi.12758 · DOI
  8. Cai, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in soybean hairy roots., PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0136064 · DOI
  9. Cermak, 2011, Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting., Nucleic Acids Res., 39, 10.1093/nar/gkr218 · DOI
  10. Chandrasekaran, 2016, Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology., Mol. Plant Pathol., 17, 1140, 10.1111/mpp.12375 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chen, 2013, TALENs: customizable molecular DNA scissors for genome engineering of plants., J. Genet. Genomics, 40, 271, 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.03.009 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2017, Targeted mutagenesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system., Sci. Rep., 7, 10.1038/srep44304 · DOI
  13. Connorton, 2017, Wheat vacuolar iron transporter TaVIT2 transports Fe and Mn and is effective for biofortification., Plant Physiol., 174, 2434, 10.1104/pp.17.00672 · DOI
  14. Cordones, 2017, Production of low-Cs + rice plants by inactivation of the K + transporter OsHAK1 with the CRISPR-Cas system., Plant J., 92, 43, 10.1111/tpj.13632 · DOI
  15. Du, 2016, Efficient targeted mutagenesis in soybean by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9., J. Biotechnol., 217, 90, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.11.005 · DOI
  16. 2017, The Study of SlPMR4 CRISPR/Cas9- Mediated Tomato Allelic Series for Resistance Against Powdery Mildew.
  17. Endo, 2016, Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida., Sci. Rep., 6, 10.1038/srep38169 · DOI
  18. Fang, 2016, Efficient disruption and replacement of an effector gene in the Oomycete Phytophthora sojae using CRISPR/Cas9., Mol. Plant Pathol., 17, 127, 10.1111/mpp.12318 · DOI
  19. 2016, FAOSTAT Database.
  20. Feng, 2016, Efficient targeted genome modification in maize using CRISPR/Cas9 system., J. Genet. Genomics, 43, 37, 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.10.002 · DOI
  21. Feng, 2014, Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111, 4632, 10.1073/pnas.1400822111 · DOI
  22. Feng, 2013, Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system., Cell Res., 23, 1229, 10.1038/cr.2013.114 · DOI
  23. Fister, 2018, Transient expression of CRISPR/cas9 machinery targeting TCNPR3 enhances defense response in Theobroma cacao., Front. Plant Sci., 9, 10.3389/fpls.2018.00268 · DOI
  24. Gaj, 2013, ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering., Trends Biotechnol., 31, 397, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gao, 2016, DNA-guided genome editing using the Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute., Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 768, 10.1038/nbt.3547 · DOI
  26. Gao, 2018, Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in the obligatory outcrossing Medicago sativa., Planta, 247, 1043, 10.1007/s00425-018-2866-1 · DOI
  27. Gao, 2017, Genome editing in cotton with the CRISPR/Cas9 system., Front. Plant Sci., 8, 10.3389/fpls.2017.01364 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gil-Humanes, 2017, High-efficiency gene targeting in hexaploid wheat using DNA replicons and CRISPR/Cas9., Plant J., 89, 1251, 10.1111/tpj.13446 · DOI
  29. Govindan, 2016, Programmable site-specific nucleases for targeted genome engineering in higher eukaryotes., J. Cell. Physiol., 231, 2380, 10.1002/jcp.25367 · DOI
  30. Guilinger, 2014, Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification., Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 577, 10.1038/nbt.2909 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hayut, 2017, Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato., Nat. Commun., 8, 10.1038/ncomms15605 · DOI
  32. Hu, 2018, Increasing the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-VQR precise genome editing in rice., Plant Biotechnol. J., 16, 292, 10.1111/pbi.12771 · DOI
  33. Hu, 2016, Expanding the range of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in rice., Mol. Plant, 9, 943, 10.1016/j.molp.2016.03.003 · DOI
  34. Ishino, 1987, Nucleotide sequence of the IAP gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product., J. Bacteriol., 169, 5429, 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ito, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 467, 76, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.117 · DOI
  36. Janga, 2017, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)., Plant Mol. Biol., 94, 349, 10.1007/s11103-017-0599-3 · DOI
  37. Jansen, 2002, Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes., Mol. Microbiol., 43, 1565, 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. Ji, 2015, Establishing a CRISPR-Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants., Nat. Plants, 1, 10.1038/nplants.2015.144 · DOI
  39. Jia, 2014, Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA., PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0093806 · DOI
  40. Jia, Editing citrus genome via SaCas9/sgRNA system., Front. Plant Sci., 8, 10.3389/fpls.2017.02135 · DOI
  41. Jia, Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker., Plant Biotechnol. J., 15, 817, 10.1111/pbi.12677 · DOI
  42. Jiang, 2013, Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice., Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 10.1093/nar/gkt780 · DOI
  43. Kapusi, 2017, Heritable genomic fragment deletions and small indels in the putative engase gene induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in barley., Front. Plant Sci., 8, 10.3389/fpls.2017.00540 · DOI
  44. Karkute, 2017, CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome engineering for improvement of horticultural crops., Front. Plant Sci., 8, 10.3389/fpls.2017.01635 · DOI
  45. Kaur, 2018, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient editing in phytoene desaturase (PDS) demonstrates precise manipulation in banana cv. Rasthali genome., Funct. Integr. Genomics, 18, 89, 10.1007/s10142-017-0577-5 · DOI
  46. Kim, 2018, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat., Funct. Integr. Genomics, 18, 31, 10.1007/s10142-017-0572-x · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kim, 1996, Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to FOK I cleavage domain., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93, 1156, 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1156 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Klimek-Chodacka, 2018, Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in carrot cells., Plant Cell Rep., 37, 575, 10.1007/s00299-018-2252-2 · DOI
  49. LeBlanc, 2018, Increased efficiency of targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 in plants using heat stress., Plant J., 93, 377, 10.1111/tpj.13782 · DOI
  50. Lee, 2016, The Neisseria meningitidis CRISPR-Cas9 system enables specific genome editing in mammalian cells., Mol. Ther., 24, 645, 10.1038/mt.2016.8 · DOI
  51. Li, An efficient CRISPR/cas9 platform for rapidly generating simultaneous mutagenesis of multiple gene homoeologs in allotetraploid oilseed rape., Front. Plant Sci., 9, 10.3389/fpls.2018.00442 · DOI
  52. Li, A high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted mutagenesis in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)., Sci. Rep., 7, 10.1038/srep43902 · DOI
  53. Li, 2015, Genome sequence of cultivated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution., Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 524, 10.1038/nbt.3208 · DOI
  54. Li, 2013, Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9., Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 688, 10.1038/nbt.2654 · DOI
  55. Li, Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system., Mol. Plant, 10, 526, 10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.001 · DOI
  56. Li, Generation of thermosensitive male-sterile maize by targeted knockout of the ZmTMS5 gene., J. Genet. Genomics, 44, 465, 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.02.002 · DOI
  57. Li, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of lncRNA1459 alters tomato fruit ripening., Plant J., 94, 513, 10.1111/tpj.13872 · DOI
  58. Li, Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated metabolic engineering of gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in Solanum lycopersicum., Plant Biotechnol. J., 16, 415, 10.1111/pbi.12781 · DOI
  59. Li, 2012, High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice., Nat. Biotechnol., 30, 390, 10.1038/nbt.2199 · DOI
  60. Li, 2015, Cas9-Guide RNA directed genome editing in soybean., Plant Physiol., 169, 960, 10.1104/pp.15.00783 · DOI
  61. Liang, 2017, Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes., Nat. Commun., 8, 10.1038/ncomms14261 · DOI
  62. Liang, 2018, Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins., Nat. Protoc., 13, 413, 10.1038/nprot.2017.145 · DOI
  63. Liang, 2014, Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system., J. Genet. Genomics, 41, 63, 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.001 · DOI
  64. Liu, 2012, The rice ERF transcription factor OsERF922 negatively regulates resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and salt tolerance., J. Exp. Bot., 63, 3899, 10.1093/jxb/ers097 · DOI
  65. Liu, 2017, Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in plant biology., Acta Pharm. Sin. B, 7, 292, 10.1016/j.apsb.2017.01.002 · DOI
  66. Lowder, 2017, Rapid construction of multiplexed CRISPR-cas9 systems for plant genome editing., Methods Mol. Biol., 1578, 291, 10.1007/978-1-4939-6859-6_25 · DOI
  67. Lowder, 2015, A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation., Plant Physiol., 169, 971, 10.1104/pp.15.00636 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Ma, 2016, CRISPR/Cas9 platforms for genome editing in plants: developments and applications., Mol. Plant, 9, 961, 10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.009 · DOI
  69. Malnoy, 2016, DNA-Free genetically edited grapevine and apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins., Front. Plant Sci., 7, 10.3389/fpls.2016.01904 · DOI
  70. Malzahn, 2017, Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR., Cell Biosci., 7, 10.1186/s13578-017-0148-4 · DOI
  71. Mao, 2018, OsPRX2 contributes to stomatal closure and improves potassium deficiency tolerance in rice., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 495, 461, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.045 · DOI
  72. Mao, 2013, Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants., Mol. Plant, 6, 2008, 10.1093/mp/sst121 · DOI
  73. Mao, 2016, Development of germ-line-specific CRISPR-Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis., Plant Biotechnol. J., 14, 519, 10.1111/pbi.12468 · DOI
  74. Meng, 2017, Targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 system in the model legume Medicago truncatula., Plant Cell Rep., 36, 371, 10.1007/s00299-016-2069-9 · DOI
  75. Mojica, 2005, Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements., J. Mol. Evol., 60, 174, 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Nakajima, 2017, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape., PLoS One, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0177966 · DOI
  77. Odipio, 2017, Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of phytoene desaturase in cassava., Front. Plant Sci., 8, 10.3389/fpls.2017.01780 · DOI
  78. Oerke, 2005, Crop losses to pests., J. Agric. Sci., 144, 31, 10.1017/s0021859605005708 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Oliveira, 2016, Mixed inheritance in the genetic control of ramulosis (Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides) resistance in cotton., Genet. Mol. Res., 15, 10.4238/gmr.15038667 · DOI
  80. Osakabe, 2015, Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants., Plant Cell Physiol., 56, 389, 10.1093/pcp/pcu170 · DOI
  81. Osakabe, 2016, Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants., Sci. Rep., 6, 10.1038/srep26685 · DOI
  82. Pan, 2016, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations., Sci. Rep., 6, 10.1038/srep24765 · DOI
  83. Pauwels, 2014, Engineering nucleases for gene targeting: safety and regulatory considerations., Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 18, 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.07.001 · DOI
  84. Peng, 2017, Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus., Plant Biotechnol. J., 15, 1509, 10.1111/pbi.12733 · DOI
  85. Pyott, 2016, Engineering of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated potyvirus resistance in transgene-free Arabidopsis plants., Mol. Plant Pathol., 17, 1276, 10.1111/mpp.12417 · DOI
  86. Qi, 2016, High-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex gene editing using the glycine tRNA-processing system-based strategy in maize., BMC Biotechnol., 16, 10.1186/s12896-016-0289-2 · DOI
  87. Ren, 2016, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in chardonnay (Vitis vinifera L.)., Sci. Rep., 6, 10.1038/srep32289 · DOI
  88. Ricroch, 2017, Use of CRISPR systems in plant genome editing: toward new opportunities in agriculture., Emerg. Top. Life Sci., 1, 169, 10.1042/etls20170085 · DOI
  89. Ron, 2014, Hairy root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using tomato as a model., Plant Physiol., 166, 455, 10.1104/pp.114.239392 · DOI
  90. Sattar, 2017, CRISPR/Cas9: a practical approach in date palm genome editing., Front. Plant Sci., 8, 10.3389/fpls.2017.01469 · DOI
  91. Shen, 2017, Rapid generation of genetic diversity by multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in rice., Sci. China Life Sci., 60, 506, 10.1007/s11427-017-9008-8 · DOI
  92. Shen, 2018, QTL editing confers opposing yield performance in different rice varieties., J. Integr. Plant Biol., 60, 89, 10.1111/jipb.12501 · DOI
  93. Shan, 2014, Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system., Nat. Protoc., 9, 2395, 10.1038/nprot.2014.157 · DOI
  94. Shan, 2013, Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system., Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 686, 10.1038/nbt.2650 · DOI · Paper page
  95. Soyk, 2017, Bypassing negative epistasis on yield in tomato imposed by a domestication gene., Cell, 169, 1142, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.032 · DOI
  96. Stephens, 2017, “Gene editing technologies – ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9,” in, Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, 157, 10.1016/B978-0-12-394807-6.00242-2 · DOI
  97. Tang, 2016, Rj4, a gene controlling nodulation specificity in soybeans, encodes a thaumatin-like protein but not the one previously reported., Plant Physiol., 170, 26, 10.1104/pp.15.01661 · DOI
  98. Tian, 2017, Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based gene knockout in watermelon., Plant Cell Rep., 36, 399, 10.1007/s00299-016-2089-5 · DOI
  99. Ueta, 2017, Rapid breeding of parthenocarpic tomato plants using CRISPR/Cas9., Sci. Rep., 7, 10.1038/s41598-017-00501-4 · DOI · Paper page
  100. Waltz, 2016, Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation., Nature, 532, 10.1038/nature.2016.19754 · DOI
  101. Wang, 2016, Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922., PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0154027 · DOI
  102. Wang, 2016, Efficient inactivation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation related genes in Lotus japonicus using CRISPR-Cas9., Front. Plant Sci., 7, 10.3389/fpls.2016.01333 · DOI
  103. Wang, 2018, Transgenerational CRISPR-Cas9 activity facilitates multiplex gene editing in allopolyploid wheat., CRISPR J., 1, 65, 10.1089/crispr.2017.0010 · DOI
  104. Wang, 2018, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation., Plant Biotechnol. J., 16, 844, 10.1111/pbi.12832 · DOI
  105. Wang, 2014, Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew., Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 947, 10.1038/nbt.2969 · DOI · Paper page
  106. Wang, 2016, Identification of genomic sites for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in the Vitis vinifera genome., BMC Plant Biol., 16, 10.1186/s12870-016-0787-3 · DOI
  107. Wang, 2018, Optimized paired-sgRNA/Cas9 cloning and expression cassette triggers high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in kiwifruit., Plant Biotechnol. J., 10.1111/pbi.12884 · DOI
  108. Wang, 2015, Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation., Genome Biol., 16, 10.1186/s13059-015-0715-0 · DOI
  109. Watanabe, 2018, Alteration of flower colour in Ipomoea nil through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4., Transgenic Res., 27, 25, 10.1007/s11248-017-0051-0 · DOI
  110. Xie, 2013, RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system., Mol. Plant, 6, 1975, 10.1093/mp/sst119 · DOI
  111. Xu, 2015, Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design., Genome Res., 25, 1147, 10.1101/gr.191452.115 · DOI · Paper page
  112. Yang, 2017, The RNA editing factor SlORRM4 is required for normal fruit ripening in tomato., Plant Physiol., 175, 1690, 10.1104/pp.17.01265 · DOI
  113. Yin, 2017, CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cpf1 mediated targeting of a stomatal developmental gene EPFL9 in rice., Plant Cell Rep., 36, 745, 10.1007/s00299-017-2118-z · DOI
  114. Yu, 2017, CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted mutagenesis and gene replacement to generate long-shelf life tomato lines., Sci. Rep., 7, 10.1038/s41598-017-12262-1 · DOI
  115. Zaidi, 2017, CRISPR-Cpf1: a new tool for plant genome editing., Trends Plant Sci., 22, 550, 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  116. Zetsche, 2017, Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using a single crRNA array., Nat. Biotechnol., 35, 31, 10.1038/nbt.3737 · DOI · Paper page
  117. Zhang, 2017, Rapid and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in citrus using the YAO promoter., Plant Cell Rep., 36, 1883, 10.1007/s00299-017-2202-4 · DOI
  118. Zhang, 2014, The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation., Plant Biotechnol. J., 12, 797, 10.1111/pbi.12200 · DOI
  119. Zhang, 2018, Establishing RNA virus resistance in plants by harnessing CRISPR immune system., Plant Biotechnol. J., 10.1111/pbi.12881 · DOI
  120. Zhang, 2018, Simultaneous editing of two copies of Gh14-3-3d confers enhanced transgene-clean plant defense against Verticillium dahliae in allotetraploid upland cotton., Front. Plant Sci., 842, 10.3389/fpls.2018.00842 · DOI
  121. Zhang, 2013, Transcription activator-like effector nucleases enable efficient plant genome engineering., Plant Physiol., 161, 20, 10.1104/pp.112.205179 · DOI
  122. Zhang, 2016, A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis., Plant Cell Rep., 35, 1519, 10.1007/s00299-015-1900-z · DOI
  123. Zhao, 2016, An alternative strategy for targeted gene replacement in plants using a dual-sgRNA/Cas9 design., Sci. Rep., 6, 10.1038/srep23890 · DOI
  124. Zhou, 2015, Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice., Plant J., 82, 632, 10.1111/tpj.12838 · DOI
  125. Zhou, 2018, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis of RAS in Salvia miltiorrhiza., Phytochemistry, 148, 63, 10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.01.015 · DOI
  126. Zhu, 2016, Efficiency and inheritance of targeted mutagenesis in maize using CRISPR-Cas9., J. Genet. Genomics, 43, 25, 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.10.006 · DOI
  127. Zong, 2017, Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion., Nat. Biotechnol., 35, 438, 10.1038/nbt.3811 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., & Venkataraman, G.
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2018-07-17
Volume
9
ISSN
1664-462X
DOI
10.3389/fpls.2018.00985
PMC
PMC6056666
Cited by
619
References
10
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)
Funders
Science and Engineering Research Board (PDF/2016/001354)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review