The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship
Abstract
In situ optical meters are widely used to estimate leaf chlorophyll concentration, but non‐uniform chlorophyll distribution causes optical measurements to vary widely among species for the same chlorophyll concentration. Over 30 studies have sought to quantify the in situ/in vitro (optical/absolute) relationship, but neither chlorophyll extraction nor measurement techniques for in vitro analysis have been consistent among studies. Here we: (1) review standard procedures for measurement of chlorophyll; (2) estimate the error associated with non‐standard procedures; and (3) implement the most accurate methods to provide equations for conversion of optical to absolute chlorophyll for 22 species grown in multiple environments. Tests of five M inolta (model SPAD‐502) and 25 O pti‐S ciences (model CCM‐200) meters, manufactured from 1992 to 2013, indicate that differences among replicate models are less than 5%. We thus developed equations for converting between units from these meter types. There was no significant effect of environment on the optical/absolute chlorophyll relationship. We derive the theoretical relationship between optical transmission ratios and absolute chlorophyll concentration and show how non‐uniform distribution among species causes a variable, non‐linear response. These results link in situ optical measurements with in vitro chlorophyll concentration and provide insight to strategies for radiation capture among diverse species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS. POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA VULGARIS
Arnon, D. I. (1949) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.24.1.1 · Cited by 22,451
Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents
LICHTENTHALER, H. K., & WELLBURN, A. R. (1983) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0110591 · Cited by 6,736
Porra, R. J., Thompson, W. A., & Kriedemann, P. E. (1989) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/s0005-2728(89)80347-0 · Cited by 5,992
Wellburn, A. R. (1994) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0176-1617(11)81192-2 · Cited by 5,820
ABSORPTION OF LIGHT BY CHLOROPHYLL SOLUTIONS
Mackinney, G. (1941) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)51320-x · Cited by 3,998
A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration
Hiscox, J. D., & Israelstam, G. F. (1979) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b79-163 · Cited by 3,473
Extinction Coefficients of Chlorophyll a and b in N,N-Dimethylformamide and 80% Acetone
Inskeep, W. P., & Bloom, P. R. (1985) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.77.2.483 · Cited by 1,400
Porra, R. J. (2002) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/a:1020470224740 · Cited by 1,371
Ritchie, R. J. (2006) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-006-9065-9 · Cited by 1,320
Formulae for Determination of Chlorophyllous Pigments Extracted with N,N-Dimethylformamide
Moran, R. (1982) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.69.6.1376 · Cited by 1,230
Cited by
Xiong, D., Chen, J., Yu, T., Gao, W., Ling, X., Li, Y., Peng, S., & Huang, J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13389 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- PARRY, C., BLONQUIST, J. M., & BUGBEE, B.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2508-2520
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W1742837665
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pce.12324
- The paper
- PARRY, C., BLONQUIST, J. M., & BUGBEE, B. (2014). In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.