The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences in visible light‐induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure
Abstract
Summary: The visible light spectrum is wide, and it can be hypothesized that all the wavelengths between 400–700 nm do not induce the same photobiological effects on pigmentation. We assessed the potential pro‐pigmenting effects of two single wavelengths located at both extremities of the visible spectrum: the blue/violet line (λ = 415 nm) and the red line (λ = 630 nm). We made colorimetric, clinical, and histological assessments with increasing doses of those lights on healthy volunteers. Then, we compared these irradiations to non‐exposed and UVB‐exposed skin. Colorimetric and clinical assessments showed a clear dose effect with the 415‐nm irradiation, in both skin type III and IV subjects, whereas the 630 nm did not induce hyperpigmentation. When compared to UVB irradiation, the blue–violet light induced a significantly more pronounced hyperpigmentation that lasted up to 3 months. Histological examination showed a significant increase of keratinocyte necrosis and p53 with UVB, as compared to 415‐ and 630‐nm exposures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Central role of p53 in the suntan response and pathologic hyperpigmentation
Cui, R., Widlund, H. R., Feige, E., Lin, J. Y., Wilensky, D. L., Igras, V. E., D'Orazio, J., Fung, C. Y., Schanbacher, C. F., Granter, S. R., et al. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.045 · Cited by 657
Birch-Machin, M. A., Russell, E. V., & Latimer, J. A. (2013) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.12207 · Cited by 112
Lan, C.-C. E., Wu, C.-S., Chiou, M.-H., Hsieh, P.-C., & Yu, H.-S. (2006) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700372 · Cited by 70
Cited by
Krutmann, J., Bouloc, A., Sore, G., Bernard, B. A., & Passeron, T. (2017) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.09.015 · Cited by 768
Self-citationMelanocytes Sense Blue Light and Regulate Pigmentation through Opsin-3
Regazzetti, C., Sormani, L., Debayle, D., Bernerd, F., Tulic, M. K., De Donatis, G. M., Chignon-Sicard, B., Rocchi, S., & Passeron, T. (2018) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.07.833 · Cited by 336
Self-citationDel Bino, S., Duval, C., & Bernerd, F. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19092668 · Cited by 315
Passeron, T., Lim, H. W., Goh, C. ‐., Kang, H. Y., Ly, F., Morita, A., Ocampo Candiani, J., Puig, S., Schalka, S., Wei, L., et al. (2021) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.17242 · Cited by 221
Self-citationPhotodegradation of Eumelanin and Pheomelanin and Its Pathophysiological Implications
Ito, S., Wakamatsu, K., & Sarna, T. (2018) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/php.12837 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Duteil, L., Cardot‐Leccia, N., Queille‐Roussel, C., Maubert, Y., Harmelin, Y., Boukari, F., Ambrosetti, D., Lacour, J., & Passeron, T.
- Venue
- Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 822-826
- ISSN
- 1755-1471 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-148X
- OpenAlex
- W2123508016
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in visible light‐induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pcmr.12273
- The paper
- Duteil, L., Cardot‐Leccia, N., Queille‐Roussel, C., Maubert, Y., Harmelin, Y., Boukari, F., Ambrosetti, D., Lacour, J., & Passeron, T. (2014). Differences in visible light‐induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
