Cited by 54Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysMicroRNA in disease regulationCancer Cells and Metastasis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

miR‐200c/Bmi1 axis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition contribute to acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitor treatment

Open access

Abstract

Summary: Resistance to BRAF inhibitors ( BRAF i) is one of the major challenges for targeted therapies for BRAF ‐mutant melanomas. However, little is known about the role of micro RNA s in conferring BRAF i resistance. Herein, we demonstrate that miR‐200c expression is significantly reduced whereas miR‐200c target genes including Bmi1, Zeb2, Tubb3, ABCG 5, and MDR 1 are significantly increased in melanomas that acquired BRAF i resistance compared to pretreatment tumor biopsies. Similar changes were observed in BRAF i‐resistant melanoma cell lines. Overexpression of miR‐200c or knock‐down of Bmi1 in resistant melanoma cells restores their sensitivities to BRAF i, leading to deactivation of the PI 3K/ AKT and MAPK signaling cascades, and acquisition of epithelial–mesenchymal transition‐like phenotypes, including upregulation of E‐cadherin, downregulation of N‐cadherin, and ABCG 5 and MDR 1 expression. Conversely, knock‐down of miR‐200c or overexpression of Bmi1 in BRAF i‐sensitive melanoma cells activates the PI 3K/ AKT and MAPK pathways, upregulates N‐cadherin, ABCG 5, and MDR 1 expression, and downregulates E‐cadherin expression, leading to BRAF i resistance. Together, our data identify miR‐200c as a critical signaling node in BRAF i‐resistant melanomas impacting the MAPK and PI 3K/ AKT pathways, suggesting miR‐200c as a potential therapeutic target for overcoming acquired BRAF i resistance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pcmr.12379

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy led to a decrease in E-cadherin expression in melanoma.

    “Moreover, resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy led to a decrease in E-cadherin expression in melanoma [44,45].”

    From Inhibition of fatty acid synthase enhances therapeutic efficacy and delays acquired resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results report lower E-cadherin expression in BRAFi-resistant melanoma cell lines than in their parental lines, and in post-treatment tumor biopsies. They establish an association, but do not show that resistance itself caused the decrease; the paper instead identifies reduced miR-200c as a contributor to resistance and the accompanying changes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08235.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060754 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/ng.356 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1039/b207317j · DOI
  5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn224 · DOI
  6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007181 · DOI
  7. 10.1056/NEJMoa1002011 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1015557108 · DOI
  9. 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.103929 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nrc706 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/ncb1722 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/1476-4598-10-10 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2008.00949.x · DOI
  14. 10.1002/jcb.20012 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/cncr.26100 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0304-419X(02)00052-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2225 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050469 · DOI
  19. 10.2174/156800909788166574 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.08.038 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.07.009 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604167 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2014.02.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/cgt.2010.18 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/ijc.22891 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nature09626 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nature10953 · DOI
  28. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2954 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/1471-2407-14-785 · DOI
  30. 10.1101/gad.1640608 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/ncomms4649 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/cddis.2011.61 · DOI
  33. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131421 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003065 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.011 · DOI
  36. 10.1172/JCI39374 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.019 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nrc822 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nrm1835 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08246.x · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.023 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.drup.2010.07.001 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/ncb1998 · DOI
  44. Wu X., 2011, Silencing of Bmi‐1 gene by RNA interference enhances sensitivity to doxorubicin in breast cancer cells, Indian J. Exp. Biol., 49, 105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, S., Tetzlaff, M. T., Wang, T., Yang, R., Xie, L., Zhang, G., Krepler, C., Xiao, M., Beqiri, M., Xu, W., Karakousis, G., Schuchter, L., Amaravadi, R. K., Xu, W., Wei, Z., Herlyn, M., Yao, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Xu, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The Wistar Institute (US)
  • Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Xiaowei
Venue
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-16
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
431-441
ISSN
  • 1755-1471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-148X
OpenAlex
W2070230754
Cited by
54
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CA-116103, AR-054593S1, AR-054593)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
miR-200c, BMI1, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, BRAF inhibitor resistance, BRAF-mutant melanoma, microRNA, PI3K/Akt signaling, MAPK signaling, ABCG5, MDR1, ZEB2, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Indoles, Phenotype, Sulfonamides, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, MicroRNAs, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Mice, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Polycomb Repressive Complex 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review