Cited by 15Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFace Recognition and PerceptionPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Symptom severity of panic disorder associated with impairment in emotion processing of threat-related facial expressions

Open access
Wang, Sheng‐Min, Kim, Yura, Yeon, Bora, Lee, Hae‐Kook, Kweon, Yong‐Sil, Lee, Chung Tai, Lee, Kyoung‐Uk·2013·Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Aim: To compare emotion recognition patterns between patients with panic disorder (PD) and healthy volunteers and to analyze the correlation between the degree of emotion recognition impairment and symptom severity in patients with PD. Methods: Twenty‐four patients with PD and 20 healthy controls were tested with a facial emotional expression recognition task involving four basic emotions (i.e. happiness, sadness, anger, and fear). Emotion recognition measures included the recognition threshold, response time, response time of correctly classified emotions (response time_crt), and recognition error. An average of all four emotions for each emotion recognition measure was compared between the two groups and then a comparison of recognition measures for each specific emotion was conducted. The correlations between severity of the S tate–T rait A nxiety I nventory, Beck D epression I nventory (BDI), and P anic D isorder S everity S cale with emotion recognition indices were also analyzed. Results: Average recognition threshold was significantly higher in the PD group compared to the control group. In the PD group, there was a non‐significant trend of increase in the emotion recognition threshold for fear and the response time for anger compared with the control group. In the correlation analysis, higher trait anxiety was associated with slower response time_crt for anger and a higher BDI score was associated with slower response times and response time_crt for happiness and anger. Conclusion: This study suggests that symptom severity of PD might be associated with impairment in emotion processing of threat‐related facial expressions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pcn.12039

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mean threshold for recognizing threat-related facial expressions was significantly higher in the PD group compared to NC (p = 0.041).

    “The mean threshold for recognizing threat-related facial expressions was significantly higher in the PD group compared to NC (p = 0.041)”

    From Managing emotions in panic disorder: A systematic review of studies related to emotional intelligence, alexithymia, emotion regulation, and coping (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al (2013)

    The Emotion recognition patterns table (p. 4) reports a higher average recognition threshold in the PD group than in controls (51.04 versus 45.38; p = 0.041). But that average covers all four emotions, not threat-related expressions specifically. The thresholds for anger and fear were not individually significant (p = 0.215 and p = 0.092). (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Kim, Y., Yeon, B., Lee, H., Kweon, Y., Lee, C. T., & Lee, K.
Affiliations
  • The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
  • Department of Psychiatry Uijeongbu St Mary's Hospital Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine Uijeongbu Korea
Corresponding author
Lee, Kyoung‐Uk
Venue
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
245-252
ISSN
  • 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1819
OpenAlex
W1486412951
Cited by
15
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
panic disorder, emotion recognition, facial expressions, fear, symptom severity, trait anxiety, depression, reaction time (psychology), basic emotions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Severity of Illness Index, Social Perception, Panic Disorder, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review