The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural basis of major depressive disorder: Beyond monoamine hypothesis
Open accessAbstract
The monoamine hypothesis has been accepted as the most common hypothesis of major depressive disorder (MDD) for a long period because of its simplicity and understandability. Actually, most currently used antidepressants have been considered to act based on the monoamine hypothesis. However, an important problem of the monoamine hypothesis has been pointed out as follows: it fails to explain the latency of response to antidepressants. In addition, many patients with MDD have remained refractory to currently used antidepressants. Therefore, monoamine-alternate hypotheses are required to explain the latency of response to antidepressants. Such hypotheses have been expected to contribute to identifying hopeful new therapeutic targets for MDD. Past studies have revealed that the volume of the hippocampus is decreased in patients with MDD, which is likely caused by the failure of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and following elevation of glucocorticoids. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the volume of the hippocampus: (i) the neuroplasticity hypothesis; and (ii) the neurogenesis hypothesis. The neuroplasticity hypothesis explains how the hippocampal volume is decreased by the morphological changes of hippocampal neurons, such as the shortening length of dendrites and the decreased number and density of spines. The neurogenesis hypothesis explains how the hippocampal volume is decreased by the decrease of neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. These hypotheses are able to explain the latency of response to antidepressants. In this review, we first overview how the neuroplasticity and neurogenesis hypotheses have been developed. We then describe the details of these hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is a complex relationship between the HPA axis, glucocorticoid receptors, epigenetic mechanisms, and psychiatric sequelae [130,212].”
From Biological, Psychological, and Social Determinants of Depression: A Review of Recent Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [212]
In the citing paper
“The results show that factors, such as low cognitive ability/function, cognitive vulnerability, cognitive impairment or deficits, subjective cognitive decline, regression of dendritic branching and hippocampal atrophy/death of hippocampal cells, impaired neuroplasticity, and neurogenesis-related aspects, have been linked to depression [131,212,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,2”
From Biological, Psychological, and Social Determinants of Depression: A Review of Recent Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [212]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus
Eriksson, P. S., Perfilieva, E., Björk-Eriksson, T., Alborn, A.-M., Nordborg, C., Peterson, D. A., & Gage, F. H. (1998) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/3305 · Cited by 6,369
Lopez, A. D., Mathers, C. D., Ezzati, M., Jamison, D. T., & Murray, C. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68770-9 · Cited by 5,630
Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease
de Kloet, E. R., Joëls, M., & Holsboer, F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1683 · Cited by 4,621
Requirement of hippocampal neurogenesis for the behavioral effects of antidepressants
Santarelli, L., Saxe, M., Gross, C., Surget, A., Battaglia, F., Dulawa, S., Weisstaub, N., Lee, J., Duman, R., Arancio, O., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083328 · Cited by 4,321
Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients
Berman, R. M., Cappiello, A., Anand, A., Oren, D. A., Heninger, G. R., Charney, D. S., & Krystal, J. H. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00230-9 · Cited by 3,856
A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression.
Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., Brutsche, N. E., Ameli, R., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Charney, D. S., & Manji, H. K. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856 · Cited by 3,766
Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats
Altman, J., & Das, G. D. (1965) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901240303 · Cited by 3,592
Kuhn, H., Dickinson-Anson, H., & Gage, F. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-06-02027.1996 · Cited by 3,139
Chronic antidepressant treatment increases neurogenesis in adult rat hippocampus
Malberg, J. E., Eisch, A. J., Nestler, E. J., & Duman, R. S. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-24-09104.2000 · Cited by 3,111
mTOR-Dependent Synapse Formation Underlies the Rapid Antidepressant Effects of NMDA Antagonists
Li, N., Lee, B., Liu, R.-J., Banasr, M., Dwyer, J. M., Iwata, M., Li, X.-Y., Aghajanian, G., & Duman, R. S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1190287 · Cited by 2,881
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biological, Psychological, and Social Determinants of Depression: A Review of Recent Literature
Remes, O., Mendes, J. F., & Templeton, P. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11121633 · Cited by 482
van Velzen, L. S., Kelly, S., Isaev, D., Aleman, A., Aftanas, L. I., Bauer, J., Baune, B. T., Brak, I. V., Carballedo, A., Connolly, C. G., et al. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0477-2 · Cited by 369
Numakawa, T., Odaka, H., & Adachi, N. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19113650 · Cited by 367
On inflammatory hypothesis of depression: what is the role of IL-6 in the middle of the chaos?
Roohi, E., Jaafari, N., & Hashemian, F. (2021) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-021-02100-7 · Cited by 256
Chudzik, A., Orzyłowska, A., Rola, R., & Stanisz, G. J. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11071000 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Boku, S., Nakagawa, S., Toda, H., & Hishimoto, A.
- Affiliations
- Kobe University (JP)
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- National Defense Medical College Hospital (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Boku, Shuken
- Venue
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-19
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-12
- ISSN
- 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1819
- OpenAlex
- W2770859047
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, monoamine hypothesis, antidepressant resistance, hippocampal volume, hippocampal neurogenesis, dentate gyrus, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, glucocorticoids, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Major Depressive Disorder, Glucocorticoids, Hippocampus, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Neuronal Plasticity, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Stress, Psychological, Neurotransmitter Agents, Neurogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
