Cited by 148Dermatology and Skin DiseasesAsthma and respiratory diseasesContact Dermatitis and Allergies

Study of the Atopic March: Development of Atopic Comorbidities

Open access
Schneider, Lynda, Hanifin, Jon, Boguniewicz, Mark, Eichenfield, Lawrence F., Spergel, Jonathan M., Dakovic, Rada, Paller, Amy S.·2016·Pediatric Dermatology

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is often the first step in the atopic march leading to the development of asthma or allergic rhinitis. The goal of this study was to determine whether early intervention with pimecrolimus limits the atopic march in infants with AD and to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods: This was a 3‐year double‐blind study in which patients were randomized to pimecrolimus or vehicle and then open‐label pimecrolimus for a planned further 3 years. Rescue topical corticosteroid was permitted if 3 days of study medication led to no improvement; investigators made decisions on rescue medication until week 14 and caregivers thereafter. Efficacy assessments included disease‐free days, Eczema Area and Severity Index, and body surface area affected. Results: Infants ages 3 to 18 months with recent‐onset AD (≤3 months) were observed for a mean of 2.8 years (N = 1,091). No significant differences between pimecrolimus‐ and placebo‐treated groups were found in the percentage of patients with AD who developed asthma (10.7%) or other allergic conditions (allergic rhinitis, 22.4%; food allergy, 15.9%; allergic conjunctivitis, 14.1%; one or more atopic comorbidities, 37.0%) by study end. Allergic rhinitis, food allergy, and having one or more atopic comorbidities (but not asthma or allergic conjunctivitis alone) developed significantly more often in infants with greater AD severity at baseline. Pimecrolimus was significantly more effective than vehicle for AD treatment at week 14. Adverse event incidences were similar. Conclusions: This longitudinal observation of infants with AD provides evidence of the atopic march. Pimecrolimus was safe and effective in infants with mild to moderate AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pde.12867

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing severity of atopic dermatitis correlates with an increased risk of developing allergic rhinitis, with prevalence of allergic rhinitis among people with atopic dermatitis ranging from 15% to 61%.

    “increasing severity of AD has been shown to correlate with an increased risk of developing AR, with prevalence of AR among people with AD ranging from 15% to 61%.1898-1900”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [1900]

    The Results (Atopic Comorbidities; page not available) report that allergic rhinitis developed more often in children with greater baseline atopic dermatitis severity. They report 18.5% during the double-blind period, but do not give the claimed 15%–61% prevalence range among people with atopic dermatitis. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, L., Hanifin, J., Boguniewicz, M., Eichenfield, L. F., Spergel, J. M., Dakovic, R., & Paller, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • National Jewish Health (US)
  • Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Meda (Germany) (DE)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Paller, Amy S.
Venue
Pediatric Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-07
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
388-398
ISSN
  • 0736-8046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1470
OpenAlex
W2412285133
Cited by
148
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Meda Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
atopic march, atopic dermatitis, pimecrolimus, infants, asthma development, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, allergic conjunctivitis, atopic comorbidities, topical calcineurin inhibitors, disease severity, Eczema Area and Severity Index
MeSH terms
Asthma, Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatologic Agents, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Tacrolimus, Treatment Outcome, Rhinitis, Allergic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review