Cited by 20Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationEducational Innovations and TechnologyCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Disparities in telemedicine use during the COVID‐19 pandemic among pediatric dermatology patients

Open access
Duan, Grace Y., Ruiz De Luzuriaga, Arlene M., Schroedl, Liesl M., Rosenblatt, Adena E.·2022·Pediatric Dermatology

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The COVID‐19 pandemic necessitated rapid implementation of telemedicine at medical centers across the United States. As telemedicine is expected to persist beyond the pandemic in subspecialties like pediatric dermatology, there is growing concern that socioeconomic factors may contribute to inequitable telemedicine access. This study aims to identify factors associated with disparities in telemedicine use among pediatric dermatology patients during the pandemic. Methods: In this single‐center cross‐sectional study, patients less than 18 years old who completed a visit with a pediatric dermatologist via a video telemedicine call or in‐person office visit during the specified time periods were included. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to compare demographic factors for (1) patients who had a telemedicine visit versus office visit during June 1, 2020, to January 22, 2021, and (2) patients who had either visit type during June 1, 2020, to January 22, 2021, versus June 1, 2019, to January 2020. Results: The independent factors associated with lower odds of telemedicine include identifying as Black/African American, having a non‐English preferred language, and having public insurance, whereas the independent factors reducing overall access to pediatric dermatology care during the pandemic include identifying as Hispanic/Latino and having public insurance. Conclusions: Differential telemedicine use in vulnerable communities may be attributed to disparities in technology access and digital literacy and should be addressed at a structural level. If such disparities are identified and adequately remedied, telemedicine can serve as an important tool for expanding access in the field of pediatric dermatology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pde.14982

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another single center US study demonstrated via multivariate analyses that independent factors associated with lower rates of telemedicine use were patients identifying as Black/African American and having a non-English preferred language.

    “Another single center US study [22] demonstrated via multivariate analyses that independent factors associated with lower rates of telemedicine use were patients identifying as Black/African American and having a non-English preferred language.”
  • In that study, patients on public insurance were found to have significantly lower odds of telemedicine use despite widely expanded telehealth coverage by US health insurance plans.

    “In this study, patients on public insurance were also found to have significantly lower odds of telemedicine use despite widely expanded telehealth coverage by US health insurance plans.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duan, G. Y., Ruiz De Luzuriaga, A. M., Schroedl, L. M., & Rosenblatt, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Section of Dermatology Department of Medicine University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
  • Endeavor Health (US)
  • University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Duan, Grace Y.
Venue
Pediatric Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-18
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
520-527
ISSN
  • 0736-8046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1470
OpenAlex
W4220962017
Cited by
20
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (5UL1TR002389‐04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, health disparities, socioeconomic disparities, access to dermatologic care, public insurance, racial and ethnic disparities, language barriers, digital literacy, access to technology, video consultation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dermatology, Humans, United States, Telemedicine, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review