Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physiological aspects of raffinose family oligosaccharides in plants: protection against abiotic stress

ElSayed, A. I., Rafudeen, M. S., Golldack, D.·2014·Plant Biology

Abstract

Abiotic stresses resulting from water deficit, high salinity or periods of drought adversely affect plant growth and development and represent major selective forces during plant evolution. The raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO s) are synthesised from sucrose by the subsequent addition of activated galactinol moieties donated by galactinol. RFO s are characterised as compatible solutes involved in stress tolerance defence mechanisms, although evidence also suggests that they act as antioxidants, are part of carbon partitioning strategies and may serve as signals in response to stress. The key enzyme and regulatory point in RFO biosynthesis is galactinol synthase (GolS), and an increase of GolS in expression and activity is often associated with abiotic stress. It has also been shown that different GolS isoforms are expressed in response to different types of abiotic stress, suggesting that the timing and accumulation of RFO s are controlled for each abiotic stress. However, the accumulation of RFO s in response to stress is not universal and other functional roles have been suggested for RFO s, such as being part of a carbon storage mechanism. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants with increased galactinol and raffinose concentrations had better ROS scavenging capacity, while many sugars have been shown in vitro to have antioxidant activity, suggesting that RFO s may also act as antioxidants. The RFO pathway also interacts with other carbohydrate pathways, such as that of O‐methyl inositol (OMI), which shows that the functional relevance of RFO s must not be seen in isolation to overall carbon re‐allocation during stress responses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/plb.12053

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
ElSayed, A. I., Rafudeen, M. S., & Golldack, D.
Venue
Plant Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-12
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 1435-8603 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8677
OpenAlex
W2036586152
Cited by
379
References
80
FWCI
17.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological aspects of raffinose family oligosaccharides in plants: protection against abiotic stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/plb.12053
The paper
ElSayed, A. I., Rafudeen, M. S., & Golldack, D. (2014). Physiological aspects of raffinose family oligosaccharides in plants: protection against abiotic stress. Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.