Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Clinicians Use Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs: A Qualitative Inquiry: Clinicians' Use of PDMPs

Hildebran, Christi, Cohen, Deborah J., Irvine, Jessica M., Foley, Carol, O'Kane, Nicole, Beran, Todd, Deyo, Richard A.·2014·Pain Medicine

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pme.12469

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Deyo, 2013, Measures such as interstate cooperation would improve the efficacy of programs to track controlled drug prescriptions, Health Aff, 3, 603, 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0945 · DOI
  2. Feldman, 2012, Influencing controlled substance prescribing: Attending and resident physician use of a state prescription monitoring program, Pain Med, 13, 908, 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01412.x · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01412.x
  3. Feldman, 2011, Awareness and utilization of prescription monitoring program among physicians, J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother, 25, 313, 10.3109/15360288.2011.606292 · DOI
  4. Green, 2012, How does use of a prescription monitoring program change medical practice?, Pain Med, 13, 1314, 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01452.x · DOI
  5. Glaser, 1967, The Discovery Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry
  6. Borkan, 1999, Doing Qualitative Research, 179
  7. Perrone, 2012, Prescribing practices, knowledge, and use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP) by a national sample of medical toxicologists, J Med Toxicol, 8, 342, 10.1007/s13181-012-0250-2 · DOI
  8. Perrone, 2012, Medication reconciliation for controlled substances: An “ideal” prescription drug monitoring program, N Engl J Med, 366, 2341, 10.1056/NEJMp1204493 · DOI
  9. Weiner, 2013, Clinicians impressions vs PDMP criteria in the assessment of drug-seeking behavior in emergency department, Ann Emerg Med, 62, 281, 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.05.025 · DOI
  10. Vijayaraghavan, 2011, Primary care providers' judgments of opioid analgesic misuse in a community-based cohort of HIV-infected indigent adults, J Gen Intern Med, 26, 412, 10.1007/s11606-010-1555-y · DOI
  11. Dellasgera, 2010, Motivational interviewing to change type 2 diabetes self-care behaviours, J Diabetes Nurs, 14, 112
  12. Webster, 2013, New policy role for pharmacists undermines partnership with prescribers, Pain Med, 14, 1619, 10.1111/pme.12290 · doi:10.1111/pme.12290
  13. Dole, 2013, Pharmacist speak out: The AMA's “drug store intrusion” resolution and Walgreens' “good faith dispensing” policy, Drug Topics, 157, 9

Cited by

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Hildebran, C., Cohen, D. J., Irvine, J. M., Foley, C., O'Kane, N., Beran, T., & Deyo, R. A.
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2014-05-16
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
1179-1186
ISSN
1526-2375
Cited by
66
References
2
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 473 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Clinicians Use Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs: A Qualitative Inquiry: Clinicians' Use of PDMPs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pme.12469
The paper
Hildebran, C., Cohen, D. J., Irvine, J. M., Foley, C., O'Kane, N., Beran, T., & Deyo, R. A. (2014). How Clinicians Use Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs: A Qualitative Inquiry: Clinicians' Use of PDMPs. Pain Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.