The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Competitive Environment on Supply Chain Information Sharing and Performance: An Empirical Study in China
Open accessAbstract
Information sharing in supply chains has become an important topic over the past decade. This study uses data from 617 Chinese manufacturing firms to investigate the relationships among competitive environments, supply chain information sharing (SCIS), and supply chain performance. The results of structural equation modeling analysis show that (i) international competition is positively related to all three types of SCIS whereas local competition is not significantly related to any of the three types, (ii) internal information sharing is positively related to external information sharing with suppliers and customers, and (iii) internal information sharing and information sharing with customers are positively related to superior supply chain performance, whereas supplier information sharing is not significantly related to performance. The findings enhance our understanding of the relationships among competitive environment, SCIS, and supply chain performance in Chinese manufacturing settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach
Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001 · Cited by 3,310
Self-citationPerformance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 · Cited by 3,259
Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective1
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036518 · Cited by 1,639 · cited 1×
“Chwelos et al. (2001) and Teo et al. (2003) found competitive pressure to be a significant predictor of the intent to adopt EDI.”
BackgroundLack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462 · Cited by 1,616
The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004 · Cited by 813
Self-citation
Cited by
Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2016-0173 · Cited by 494
Gu, M., Yang, L., & Huo, B. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107956 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huo, B., Zhao, X., & Zhou, H.
- Venue
- Production and Operations Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 552-569
- ISSN
- 1059-1478 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-5956
- OpenAlex
- W1976120318
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 20.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Competitive Environment on Supply Chain Information Sharing and Performance: An Empirical Study in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/poms.12044
- The paper
- Huo, B., Zhao, X., & Zhou, H. (2014). The Effects of Competitive Environment on Supply Chain Information Sharing and Performance: An Empirical Study in China. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
