A Sense of Powerlessness Fosters System Justification: Implications for the Legitimation of Authority, Hierarchy, and Government
Open accessAbstract
In an attempt to explain the stability of hierarchy, we focus on the perspective of the powerless and how a subjective sense of dependence leads them to imbue the system and its authorities with legitimacy. In S tudy 1, we found in a nationally representative sample of U.S. employees that financial dependence on one's job was positively associated with the perceived legitimacy of one's supervisor. In S tudy 2, we observed that a general sense of powerlessness was positively correlated with the perceived legitimacy of the economic system. In S tudies 3 and 4, priming experimental participants with feelings of powerlessness increased their justification of the social system, even when they were presented with system‐challenging explanations for race, class, and gender disparities. In S tudy 5, we demonstrated that the experience of powerlessness increased legitimation of governmental authorities (relative to baseline conditions). The processes we identify are likely to perpetuate inequality insofar as the powerless justify rather than strive to change the hierarchical structures that disadvantage them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical research also supports the notion that a sense of powerlessness fosters system justification.
“Empirical research also supports the notion that a sense of powerlessness fosters system justification (Van Der Toorn et al., 2015).”
From “The greedy I that gives”—The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations amid the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as Van Der Toorn et al., 2015
Cites
Power, approach, and inhibition.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265 · Cited by 3,427 · see citing works
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211628 · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07 · Cited by 2,118 · see citing works
Self-citationProcedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law
Tyler, T. R. (2003) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/652233 · Cited by 1,432 · see citing works
Self-citationThe psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology
Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280240000046 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Self-citationCompensatory Control: Achieving Order Through the Mind, Our Institutions, and the Heavens
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Context of Social Identity: Domination, Resistance, and Change
Reicher, S. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1026481205719 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Income inequality influences perceptions of legitimate income differences
Trump, K.-S. (2018) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123416000326 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Belief in school meritocracy as a system-justifying tool for low status students
Wiederkehr, V., Bonnot, V., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Darnon, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01053 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
van der Toorn, J., Nail, P. R., Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationJin, S. V., & Ryu, E. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12381 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University
- Stanford University (US)
- New York University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-22
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-110
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W1536493035
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 42.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiteit Leiden
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- powerlessness, system justification, legitimacy of authority, hierarchy, government legitimacy, financial dependence, social inequality, priming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review