Cited by 259Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

A Sense of Powerlessness Fosters System Justification: Implications for the Legitimation of Authority, Hierarchy, and Government

Open access
van der Toorn, Jojanneke, Feinberg, Matthew, Jost, John T., Kay, Aaron C., Tyler, Tom R., Willer, Robb, Wilmuth, Caroline·2015·Political Psychology

Abstract

In an attempt to explain the stability of hierarchy, we focus on the perspective of the powerless and how a subjective sense of dependence leads them to imbue the system and its authorities with legitimacy. In S tudy 1, we found in a nationally representative sample of U.S. employees that financial dependence on one's job was positively associated with the perceived legitimacy of one's supervisor. In S tudy 2, we observed that a general sense of powerlessness was positively correlated with the perceived legitimacy of the economic system. In S tudies 3 and 4, priming experimental participants with feelings of powerlessness increased their justification of the social system, even when they were presented with system‐challenging explanations for race, class, and gender disparities. In S tudy 5, we demonstrated that the experience of powerlessness increased legitimation of governmental authorities (relative to baseline conditions). The processes we identify are likely to perpetuate inequality insofar as the powerless justify rather than strive to change the hierarchical structures that disadvantage them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pops.12183

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University
  • Stanford University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-22
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
93-110
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W1536493035
Cited by
259
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
42.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Leiden
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
powerlessness, system justification, legitimacy of authority, hierarchy, government legitimacy, financial dependence, social inequality, priming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review