Cited by 76Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionElectoral Systems and Political Participation

My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism?

van der Toorn, Jojanneke, Nail, Paul R., Liviatan, Ido, Jost, John T.·2014·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental studies suggest that increasing system justification motivation may, in some cases, raise the national attachment levels of people who hold liberal views so that they more closely resemble those of people who hold conservative views, thereby temporarily reducing polarization on issues of patriotism - but not nationalism.

    “Experimental studies suggest that increasing system justification motivation may, in some cases, raise the national attachment levels of people who hold liberal views so that they more closely resemble those of people who hold conservative views, thereby temporarily reducing polarization on issues of patriotism — but not nationalism, defined as an attitude of superiority towards other countries282”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Toorn, J., Nail, P. R., Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Arkansas (US)
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
54
Pages
50-60
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017408405
Cited by
76
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • New York University (NYU)
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-0617558)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
system justification, patriotism, national attachment, nationalism, political ideology, liberals and conservatives, motivated social cognition, system dependence, national identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review