Cited by 22Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Patient InvolvementPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Effectiveness of Shared Decision-Making Training Program in People With Schizophrenia in South Korea

Open access
An, Se Youn, Kim, Gyung Hee, Kim, Ji Young·2017·Perspectives in Psychiatric Care

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) training program on self-esteem, problem-solving ability, and quality of life in people with schizophrenia. DESIGN AND METHODS: A quasi-experiment with a nonequivalent control group pre-posttest design was conducted. The self-esteem scale, the problem-solving ability scale, and the WHOQOL Scale were used. FINDINGS: The SDM training program was effective in improving their self-esteem, problem-solving ability, and quality of life in people with schizophrenia. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The SDM training program can be used in various mental health fields such as hospitals, mental health centers, and rehabilitation facilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ppc.12144

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kim, T. W. (2009). A study on effectiveness of the problem solving ability reinforcement program for the psychiatric disabilities. Unpublished master's thesis, Daegu University, Daegu, South Korea.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
An, S. Y., Kim, G. H., & Kim, J. Y.
Affiliations
  • Yongin Mental Hospital (KR)
  • Seoul Women's College of Nursing (KR)
  • Jeonbuk National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Ji Young
Venue
Perspectives in Psychiatric Care
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-25
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
111-118
ISSN
0031-5990 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2176718422
Cited by
22
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives In Psychiatric Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
shared decision-making, training program, schizophrenia, self-esteem, problem-solving skills, quality of life, patient empowerment, psychiatric rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Problem Solving, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Self Concept, Program Evaluation, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review