Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990–2011

Open access
Rossen, Lauren M., Ahrens, Katherine A., Branum, Amy M.·2018·Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy loss can have physical and psychological consequences for women and their families. Though a previous study described an increase in the risk of self‐reported pregnancy loss from 1970 to 2000, more recent examinations from population‐based data of US women are lacking. Methods: We used data from the 1995, 2002, 2006–2010, 2011–2015 National Survey of Family Growth on self‐reported pregnancy loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy) among US women (15–44 years) who reported at least one pregnancy conceived during 1990–2011 that did not result in induced termination (n = 20 012 women; n = 42 526 pregnancies). Trends in the risk of self‐reported pregnancy loss and early pregnancy loss (<12 weeks) were estimated, separately, by year of pregnancy conception (limited to 1990–2011 to ensure a sufficient sample of pregnancies for each year and maternal age group) using log‐Binomial and Poisson models, adjusted for maternal‐ and pregnancy‐related factors. Results: Among all self‐reported pregnancies, excluding induced terminations, the risk of pregnancy loss was 19.7% and early pregnancy loss was 13.5% during 1990–2011. Risk of pregnancy loss increased by a relative 2% (rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 1.02) per year in unadjusted models and 1% per year (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00, 1.02) during 1990–2011, after adjustment for maternal characteristics and pregnancy‐related factors. In general, trends were similar for early pregnancy loss. Conclusion: From 1990 to 2011, risk of self‐reported pregnancy loss increased among US women. Further work is needed to better understand the drivers of this increase in reported pregnancy loss in the US.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ppe.12417

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00292.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01452.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/jocn.12781 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31802f1d28 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/humrep/det332 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/humrep/dev274 · DOI
  7. Kline J, 1989, Conception to Birth: Epidemiology of Prenatal Development
  8. 10.1002/bdra.23014 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.009 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/humrep/dev329 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s13524-012-0113-0 · DOI
  12. Branum AM, 2016, Trends in timing of pregnancy awareness among US women, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21, 715, 10.1007/s10995-016-2155-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60300-8 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/00016340500494887 · DOI
  15. 10.1136/ewjm.173.5.331 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.013 · DOI
  17. Harb HM, 2014, Ethnicity and miscarriage: a large prospective observational study and meta‐analysis, Fertility and Sterility, 102, e81, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.276 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.276
  18. 10.1093/aje/kws393 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114982 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/00016340902814567 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.04.011 · DOI
  22. 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301416 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1067 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.2307/2991627 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.043 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/17441692.2011.594072 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Rossen, L. M., Ahrens, K. A., & Branum, A. M.
Venue
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-20
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
19-29
ISSN
  • 0269-5022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3016
OpenAlex
W2765259962
Cited by
215
References
6
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990–2011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ppe.12417
The paper
Rossen, L. M., Ahrens, K. A., & Branum, A. M. (2018). Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990–2011. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12417

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.