The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990–2011
Open accessAbstract
Background: Pregnancy loss can have physical and psychological consequences for women and their families. Though a previous study described an increase in the risk of self‐reported pregnancy loss from 1970 to 2000, more recent examinations from population‐based data of US women are lacking. Methods: We used data from the 1995, 2002, 2006–2010, 2011–2015 National Survey of Family Growth on self‐reported pregnancy loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy) among US women (15–44 years) who reported at least one pregnancy conceived during 1990–2011 that did not result in induced termination (n = 20 012 women; n = 42 526 pregnancies). Trends in the risk of self‐reported pregnancy loss and early pregnancy loss (<12 weeks) were estimated, separately, by year of pregnancy conception (limited to 1990–2011 to ensure a sufficient sample of pregnancies for each year and maternal age group) using log‐Binomial and Poisson models, adjusted for maternal‐ and pregnancy‐related factors. Results: Among all self‐reported pregnancies, excluding induced terminations, the risk of pregnancy loss was 19.7% and early pregnancy loss was 13.5% during 1990–2011. Risk of pregnancy loss increased by a relative 2% (rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01, 1.02) per year in unadjusted models and 1% per year (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00, 1.02) during 1990–2011, after adjustment for maternal characteristics and pregnancy‐related factors. In general, trends were similar for early pregnancy loss. Conclusion: From 1990 to 2011, risk of self‐reported pregnancy loss increased among US women. Further work is needed to better understand the drivers of this increase in reported pregnancy loss in the US.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of early loss of pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., O'Connor, J. F., Baird, D. D., Schlatterer, J. P., Canfield, R. E., Armstrong, E. G., & Nisula, B. C. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198807283190401 · Cited by 2,354
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1506575 · Cited by 1,989
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study
Andersen, A.-M. N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708 · Cited by 1,690 · cited 1×
“…pregnancy loss and early pregnancy loss are within the range of estimates provided by previous studies, 9–14 but are higher than some estimates based on spontaneous abortions requiring hospital admission, 34 presumably reflecting that many pregnancy losses are not captured in hospital records.”
Risk factors for first trimester miscarriage—results from a UK-population-based case-control study
Maconochie, N., Doyle, P., Prior, S., & Simmons, R. (2007) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01193.x · Cited by 387
A national survey on public perceptions of miscarriage
Bardos, J., Hercz, D., Friedenthal, J., Missmer, S. A., & Williams, Z. (2015) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000859 · Cited by 205
Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage
Kolte, A. M., van Oppenraaij, R. H., Quenby, S., Farquharson, R. G., Stephenson, M., Goddijn, M., & Christiansen, O. B. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu042 · Cited by 70
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00292.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01452.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jocn.12781 · DOI
- 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31802f1d28 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/det332 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/dev274 · DOI
- Kline J, 1989, Conception to Birth: Epidemiology of Prenatal Development
- 10.1002/bdra.23014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.009 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/dev329 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13524-012-0113-0 · DOI
- Branum AM, 2016, Trends in timing of pregnancy awareness among US women, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21, 715, 10.1007/s10995-016-2155-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60300-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00016340500494887 · DOI
- 10.1136/ewjm.173.5.331 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.013 · DOI
- Harb HM, 2014, Ethnicity and miscarriage: a large prospective observational study and meta‐analysis, Fertility and Sterility, 102, e81, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.276 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.276
- 10.1093/aje/kws393 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114982 · DOI
- 10.1080/00016340902814567 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.04.011 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301416 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1067 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2991627 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.043 · DOI
- 10.1080/17441692.2011.594072 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Quenby, S., Gallos, I. D., Dhillon-Smith, R. K., Podesek, M., Stephenson, M. D., Fisher, J., Brosens, J. J., Brewin, J., Ramhorst, R., Lucas, E. S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00682-6 · Cited by 1,560
Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study
Magnus, M. C., Wilcox, A. J., Morken, N.-H., Weinberg, C. R., & Håberg, S. E. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l869 · Cited by 698
Environmental factors in declining human fertility
Skakkebæk, N. E., Lindahl-Jacobsen, R., Levine, H., Andersson, A.-M., Jørgensen, N., Main, K. M., Lidegaard, Ø., Priskorn, L., Holmboe, S. A., Bräuner, E. V., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-021-00598-8 · Cited by 389
Dasatinib plus quercetin prevents uterine age-related dysfunction and fibrosis in mice
Cavalcante, M. B., Saccon, T. D., Nunes, A. D. C., Kirkland, J. L., Tchkonia, T., Schneider, A., & Masternak, M. M. (2020) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.102772 · Cited by 80
First‐trimester ultrasound features associated with subsequent miscarriage: A prospective study
Taylor, T. J., Quinton, A. E., de Vries, B. S., & Hyett, J. A. (2019) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/ajo.12944 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossen, L. M., Ahrens, K. A., & Branum, A. M.
- Venue
- Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-29
- ISSN
- 0269-5022 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3016
- OpenAlex
- W2765259962
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990–2011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ppe.12417
- The paper
- Rossen, L. M., Ahrens, K. A., & Branum, A. M. (2018). Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990–2011. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.