The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Underreporting of Induced and Spontaneous Abortion in the United States: An Analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
Abstract
Underreporting of induced abortions in surveys is widespread, both in countries where the procedure is illegal or highly restricted and in those where it is legal. In this study, we find that fewer than one half of induced abortions performed in the United States in 1997–2001 (47 percent) were reported by women during face‐to‐face interviews in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Hispanic and black women and those with low income were among the least likely to report their experience of abortion. Women were also less likely to report abortions that occurred when they were in their 20s. Second‐trimester abortions were more likely to be reported than first‐trimester terminations. The levels of recent spontaneous abortion reported in the 2002 NSFG were consistent with the accumulated body of clinical research, although substantially more lifetime pregnancy losses were reported on self‐administered surveys than in face‐to‐face interviews. Subsequent research should explore strategies to improve information collected on abortion, and, in the interim, research involving pregnancy outcomes should be adjusted for unreported induced abortions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of early loss of pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., O'Connor, J. F., Baird, D. D., Schlatterer, J. P., Canfield, R. E., Armstrong, E. G., & Nisula, B. C. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198807283190401 · Cited by 2,354
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study
Andersen, A.-M. N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708 · Cited by 1,690
Cited by
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1506575 · Cited by 1,989
Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008
Sedgh, G., Singh, S., Shah, I. H., Åhman, E., Henshaw, S. K., & Bankole, A. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61786-8 · Cited by 607
Haws, R. A., Mashasi, I., Mrisho, M., Schellenberg, J. A., Darmstadt, G. L., & Winch, P. J. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.051 · Cited by 150
Cohort trends in premarital first births: what role for the retreat from marriage?
England, P., Wu, L. L., & Shafer, E. F. (2013) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0241-1 · Cited by 50
Falling through the cracks: contraceptive needs of female sex workers in Cambodia and Laos,
Morineau, G., Neilsen, G., Heng, S., Phimpachan, C., & Mustikawati, D. E. (2011) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.11.003 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. K., & Kost, K.
- Venue
- Studies in Family Planning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-197
- ISSN
- 0039-3665 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4465
- OpenAlex
- W2098564762
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Underreporting of Induced and Spontaneous Abortion in the United States: An Analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x
- The paper
- Jones, R. K., & Kost, K. (2007). Underreporting of Induced and Spontaneous Abortion in the United States: An Analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Studies in Family Planning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.