The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria enhance wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression
Abstract
Abiotic stresses such as salt and drought represent adverse environmental conditions that significantly damage plant growth and agricultural productivity. In this study, the mechanism of the plant growth‐promoting rhizo‐bacteria (PGPR)‐stimulated tolerance against abiotic stresses has been explored. Results suggest that PGPR strains, Arthrobacter protophormiae (SA3) and Dietzia natronolimnaea (STR1), can facilitate salt stress tolerance in wheat crop, while Bacillus subtilis (LDR2) can provide tolerance against drought stress in wheat. These PGPR strains enhance photosynthetic efficiency under salt and drought stress conditions. Moreover, all three PGPR strains increase indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) content of wheat under salt and drought stress conditions. The SA3 and LDR2 inoculations counteracted the increase of abscisic acid (ABA) and 1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylate (ACC) under both salt and drought stress conditions, whereas STR1 had no significant impact on the ABA and ACC content. The impact of PGPR inoculations on these physiological parameters were further confirmed by gene expression analysis as we observed enhanced levels of the TaCTR1 gene in SA3‐, STR1‐ and LDR2‐treated wheat seedlings as compared to uninoculated drought and salt stressed plants. PGPR inoculations enhanced expression of TaDREB2 gene encoding for a transcription factor, which has been shown to be important for improving the tolerance of plants to abiotic stress conditions. Our study suggest that PGPR confer abiotic stress tolerance in wheat by enhancing IAA content, reducing ABA/ACC content, modulating expression of a regulatory component (CTR1) of ethylene signaling pathway and DREB2 transcription factor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change
Hetherington, A. M., & Woodward, F. I. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01843 · Cited by 2,399
A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria
Glick, B. R., Penrose, D. M., & Li, J. (1998) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532 · Cited by 1,466 · cited 1×
“…and Vanderleyden 1995, Dodd et al. 2010) or by reducing plant ethylene levels through the bacterial enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which hydrolyses the ACC (immediate ethylene precursor) into 𝛼-ketobutyrate and ammonia (Honma and Shimomura 1978, Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundHormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
Peleg, Z., & Blumwald, E. (2011) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,359
Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors
Hagen, G., & Guilfoyle, T. (2002) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1015207114117 · Cited by 1,262
Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress
Mayak, S., Tirosh, T., & Glick, B. R. (2004) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.009 · Cited by 1,254
Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage
Averill, C., Turner, B. L., & Finzi, A. C. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12901 · Cited by 1,092
Nadeem, S. M., Ahmad, M., Zahir, Z. A., Javaid, A., & Ashraf, M. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005 · Cited by 1,037
Cited by
Insights into plant salt stress signaling and tolerance
Zhou, H., Shi, H., Yang, Y., Feng, X., Chen, X., Xiao, F., Lin, H., & Guo, Y. (2024) · Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2023.08.007 · Cited by 677
Microbes as Biofertilizers, a Potential Approach for Sustainable Crop Production
Nosheen, S., Ajmal, I., & Song, Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041868 · Cited by 423
MITRA, D., MONDAL, R., KHOSHRU, B., SENAPATI, A., RADHA, T. K., MAHAKUR, B., UNIYAL, N., MYO, E. M., BOUTAJ, H., SIERRA, B. E. G., et al. (2022) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(21)60042-5 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnawal, D., Bharti, N., Pandey, S. S., Pandey, A., Chanotiya, C. S., & Kalra, A.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-10
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 502-514
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W2743060934
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 21.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria enhance wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ppl.12614
- The paper
- Barnawal, D., Bharti, N., Pandey, S. S., Pandey, A., Chanotiya, C. S., & Kalra, A. (2017). Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria enhance wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.