Policy feedback, varieties of federalism, and the politics of health‐care funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Long before the COVID‐19 pandemic, health‐care spending became a key policy issue across the OECD. Comparing recent institutional trends in public health‐care financing in three federal countries—Canada, the United States, and Mexico—this article explores the political struggles over fiscal federalism in health care related to both vertical and horizontal imbalances that can generate regional tensions and pit subnational governments against one another and, especially, against the national government. Grounded in a historical institutionalist perspective, the article shows how different institutional legacies shape current conflicts over federal health‐care funding in these three highly dissimilar federal countries. Such an analysis stresses the role of policy feedback in social politics and the enduring “varieties of federalism” in North American public health‐care funding. More specifically, the article shows how the distinct nature of policy feedback effects in the United States, Mexico, and Canada helps explain why the two former countries recently witnessed major changes in intergovernmental relations over fiscal federalism for health care while the latter did not. Related Articles Bode, Ingo, and Jorge E. Culebro Moreno. 2018. “Paradoxical Internationalization: Regulatory Reforms in the Mexican Health‐Care System through the Lens of European Experience.” Politics & Policy 46(4): 678–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12268 . Lauby, Fanny, and Christopher J. McKinley. 2023. “Factors of Early COVID‐19 Prevention Policy Engagement in France and the United States.” Politics & Policy 51(5): 830–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12556 . Luccisano, Lucy, and Amy Romagnoli. 2007. “Comparing Public Social Provision and Citizenship in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: Are There Implications for a North American Space?” Politics & Policy 35(4): 716–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2007.00082.x .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The United States lies somewhere in the middle of Mexico and Canada in terms of fiscal and political decentralization.
“The United States lies somewhere in the middle of the two countries in terms of fiscal and political decentralization (Requejo, 2010;Watts, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Requejo, 2010 source
Table 2 (Additional information; page unavailable) places the United States between Mexico and Canada on the overall decentralization scale: 14.5, versus 5 and 16.5. Section 3.2 says that scale combines political powers with an economic-decentralization measure, but the available figures do not establish the same three-country ordering for fiscal decentralization separately. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Watts, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The 2023 appropriations legislation's unwinding of emergency Medicaid expansion was projected to result in the disenrollment of as many as 14 million people from Medicaid coverage in 2023.
“This policy change was projected to result in the disenrollment of as many as 14 million people from Medicaid coverage in 2023 (Tolbert & Ammula, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tolbert & Ammula, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Although REPSS were designed to exist outside state health agencies to separate financing from provision, they were in practice administratively and politically dependent on state governments.
“Although REPSS were designed to exist outside of the state health agencies, in order to separate financing from provision, as a mechanism to improve the efficiency and quality of service delivery, they were, in practice, administratively (and politically) dependent on state governments (Flamand & Moreno-Jaimes, 2014, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flamand & Moreno-Jaimes, 2014, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
There has been a massive increase in fiscal transfers from the federal government to state governments in the United States.
“The result has been a massive increase in fiscal transfers from federal to state governments (Office of Management and Budget, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Office of Management and Budget, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Medicaid enrollment increased by nearly 25% between February 2020 and January 2022.
“Medicaid enrollment increased by nearly 25% between February 2020 and January 2022 (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Oregon's experiment in expanding Medicaid eligibility to all uninsured poor adults failed to stick.
“Among other important examples, Oregon's experiment in expanding eligibility to all uninsured poor adults-despite backing from a broad bipartisan coalition-failed to stick.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oberlander, 2006 source
- Findingreasoning
In Canada, the lack of an annual escalator for health transfers between 1995 and 2004 created considerable instability in federal-provincial relations.
“In Canada, the lack of an annual escalator for health transfers between 1995 and 2004 created considerable instability in federal-provincial relations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
States that participated in Medicaid expansion were statistically significantly more likely to see larger enrollment increases during the first year of the pandemic than those that did not participate, even when controlling for important enrollment drivers such as higher rates of unemployment.
“States that participated in Medicaid expansion were, for example, statistically significantly more likely to see larger enrollment increases during the first year of the pandemic than those which did not participate-even when controlling for important enrollment drivers, such as higher rates of unemployment (Clemens et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clemens et al., 2021 source
- Findingnone given
Medicaid has become the single largest intergovernmental program in the United States.
“While its creators did not intend it, Medicaid has become the single largest intergovernmental program in the country, which explains its growing importance for intergovernmental relations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Canada did not witness any major shift in the basic intergovernmental structure of fiscal federalism for health-care funding.
“Third, in contrast to the United States and Mexico, Canada did not witness any major shift in the basic intergovernmental structure of fiscal federalism for health-care funding, a situation directly related to the relative lack of self-undermining feedback effects, which points to strong institutional stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
States have already begun to process Medicaid eligibility redeterminations in highly divergent ways.
“states have already begun to process eligibility redeterminations in highly divergent ways (Buettgens & Green, 2022;Kaiser Family Foundation, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buettgens & Green, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kaiser Family Foundation, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Between 1971 and 2021, Medicaid spending increased by 1400%.
“Between 1971 and 2021, Medicaid spending increased by 1400%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MACPAC, 2022, p. 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
The U.S. Medicaid system is characterized by an extraordinary degree of state-level variation in benefits, eligibility, rules, and restrictions.
“In terms of policy legacies, the system is thus characterized by an extraordinary degree of state-level variation in benefits, eligibility, rules, and restrictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Republican governors, with some exceptions, tended to refuse Medicaid expansion, leaving millions of dollars in intergovernmental transfers on the table.
“Republican governors-with some exceptions-tended to refuse Medicaid expansion, leaving millions of dollars in intergovernmental transfers on the table (Béland et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Béland et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Today, the federal government accounts for 72% of all Medicaid spending.
“today, the federal government accounts for 72% of all Medicaid spending (MACPAC, 2022, p. 25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites MACPAC, 2022, p. 25
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Before the elimination of SP, there were tensions between the federal and state government over the control of resources.
“Before this elimination, there were tensions between the federal and state government over the control of resources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Further changes in 2007 intended to stimulate states' tax revenue and diminish fiscal imbalances achieved practically no improvements.
“Further changes in 2007, intended to stimulate states' tax revenue and diminished such fiscal imbalances, achieved practically no improvements (Mendoza, 2019;Pérez & Villarreal Páez, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mendoza, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pérez & Villarreal Páez, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
The federal government was obligated to put health funding at the top of the agenda in each of the first ministers' meetings it reluctantly convened.
“but was obligated to put health funding at the top of the agenda in each of the meetings reluctantly convened by the federal government.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Between 1995 and 2004, provincial premiers made continual demands on the prime minister for first ministers' meetings to discuss increases in health transfers.
“This is why, between 1995 and 2004, provincial premiers made continual demands on the prime minister for first ministers' meetings to discuss increases in health transfers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The federal government resisted provincial premiers' requests for first ministers' meetings on health transfer increases.
“Naturally, the federal government resisted such requests”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Different patterns of policy feedback help account for major changes in the intergovernmental politics of fiscal federalism in health care taking place in the United States and Mexico but not in Canada.
“As our evidence suggests, different patterns of policy feedback help account for the fact that major changes in the intergovernmental politics of fiscal federalism in health care took place in the United States and Mexico but not in Canada.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Policy feedback shapes the varieties of federalism in North American public health-care funding before and during the COVID-19 crisis.
“We argue that policy feedback shapes the “varieties of federalism” in North American public health-care funding before and during the COVID-19 crisis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Existing fiscal policies shape the politics of health-care funding at both the federal and subnational level through both self-reinforcing and self-undermining feedback effects.
“The following analysis suggests that existing fiscal policies shape the politics of health-care funding at both the federal and the subnational level through both self-reinforcing and self-undermining feedback effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Over the last century, federal and state authority in the United States has become increasingly imbricated.
“One reason for this is that, over the last century, federal and state authority has become increasingly imbricated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Different institutional legacies shape current conflicts over federal health-care funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada.
“Grounded in a historical institutionalist perspective, the article shows how different institutional legacies shape current conflicts over federal health-care funding in these three highly dissimilar federal countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The distinct nature of policy feedback effects in the United States, Mexico, and Canada helps explain why the United States and Mexico recently witnessed major changes in intergovernmental relations over fiscal federalism for health care while Canada did not.
“More specifically, the article shows how the distinct nature of policy feedback effects in the United States, Mexico, and Canada helps explain why the two former countries recently witnessed major changes in intergovernmental relations over fiscal federalism for health care while the latter did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Self-undermining and/or self-reinforcing feedback mechanisms have shaped in distinct manners the intergovernmental politics of fiscal federalism over health-care financing in each of the United States, Mexico, and Canada.
“Using a processtracing approach and drawing on policy documents and existing scholarship, this analysis suggests that self-undermining and/or self-reinforcing feedback mechanisms have shaped in distinct manners the intergovernmental politics of fiscal federalism over health-care financing in each of the three countries under consideration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Medicaid's design and policy legacy affected the program's capacity to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic in two primary ways.
“Medicaid's design and policy legacy affected the program's capacity to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic in two primary ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Policy feedback plays a key role in structuring the intergovernmental politics of health-care funding in the United States.
“First, policy feedback plays a key role in structuring the intergovernmental politics of health-care funding in the United States.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Policy feedback affects the intergovernmental politics of health-care funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada, pointing to the impact of policy feedback on a key aspect of varieties of federalism.
“The above discussion about our three cases shows that policy feedback affects the intergovernmental politics of health-care funding in each of the countries under consideration, pointing to the impact of policy feedback on a key aspect of varieties of federalism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Compared to Canada and the United States, Mexico is a highly centralized federation.
“Compared to Canada and the United States, Mexico is a highly centralized federation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Incremental, pluralistic politics facilitated the centralization of resources and authority in U.S. Medicaid.
“Yet, while an incremental, pluralistic politics facilitated this centralization of resources and authority, the nationalization of politics has created an intense, polarized conflict over the boundaries and content of state Medicaid programs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In 2004, the Mexican federal government implemented Seguro Popular to provide publicly funded health insurance to an otherwise uninsured population, covering a limited set of health-care interventions and medicines.
“In 2004 the federal government implemented SP to provide publicly funded health insurance to an otherwise uninsured population, which covered a limited set of health-care interventions and medicines (Murayama & Martínez, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murayama & Martínez, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
In Mexico, the flaws in design and functioning of SP, in conjunction with political and institutional factors at state and federal levels, propitiated negative policy feedback effects that facilitated its elimination in 2020.
“Second, in Mexico, the flaws in design and functioning of SP, in conjunction with political and institutional factors at state and federal levels, propitiated negative policy feedback effects that facilitated its elimination in 2020.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the last two decades, the nature of Mexican federalism and self-undermining policy feedback provoked the emergence of a pattern of decentralization-recentralization in the Mexican health-care system.
“This suggests that, in the last two decades, the nature of Mexican federalism (i.e., the impact of authoritarian legacies in the states) and self-undermining policy feedback (i.e., the poor health-care performance in the states and the wrongdoing in the use of financial resources) provoked the emergence of a pattern of decentralization-recentralization in the Mexican health-care system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
President AMLO took advantage of the negative policy effects of SP to justify the recentralization of the public health-care services.
“In other words, he took advantage of the negative policy effects of SP to justify the recentralization of the public health-care services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The end of enhanced matching and continuous coverage requirements is likely to result in over 15 million adults and children losing Medicaid coverage.
“While the end of the enhanced matching and continuous coverage requirements is likely to result in over 15 million adults and children losing Medicaid coverage”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buettgens & Green, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kaiser Family Foundation, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Medicaid's fiscal structure has made it an attractive vehicle for state and federal policy makers to fill the gaps left in the fragmented U.S. system of insurance provision.
“In terms of policy design, the program's fiscal structure has made it an attractive vehicle for state and federal policy makers to fill the gaps left in the fragmented U.S. system of insurance provision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Canada's current stability can be traced back to the creation in 1977 of a block transfer regime, which created an intergovernmental dynamic between the federal government and the provinces that has remained in place ever since.
“This current stability can be traced back to the creation in 1977 of a block transfer regime, which created an intergovernmental dynamic between the federal government and the provinces that has remained in place ever since.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that states could opt out of Medicaid expansion.
“Because of high-profile litigation in 2012, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that states could opt out of Medicaid expansion (Béland et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Béland et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Intergovernmental relations relative to health-care funding are imbalanced toward the federal government in Mexico due to the historical concentration of political and administrative power in the federal government and the high dependence of states on federal transfers.
“Furthermore, unlike in American and Canadian federalism, the intergovernmental relations relative to health-care funding are imbalanced toward the federal government in Mexico due to, in general, the historical concentration of political and administrative power in the federal government, and, in particular, to the high dependence of states on federal transfers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
As the federal government's role expanded in the mid-twentieth century, health care emerged as a central focus of intergovernmental conflict in the United States.
“As the federal government's role expanded in the mid-twentieth century, health care emerged as a central focus of intergovernmental conflict.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Medicaid's financing arrangements have generally been a source of stability for the program through self-reinforcing feedback mechanisms.
“Even so, Medicaid's financing arrangements have generally been a source of stability for the program through self-reinforcing feedback mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Following major legislative victories for Democrats and accommodations for private-sector opponents, Congress enacted the Medicare and Medicaid programs in 1965.
“Yet following major legislative victories for Democrats, coupled with accommodations for important private-sector opponents of the program, Congress enacted the Medicare and Medicaid programs in 1965 (Berkowitz, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berkowitz, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The nationalization of politics has created an intense, polarized conflict over the boundaries and content of state Medicaid programs.
“Yet, while an incremental, pluralistic politics facilitated this centralization of resources and authority, the nationalization of politics has created an intense, polarized conflict over the boundaries and content of state Medicaid programs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The emergence of health care as a central intergovernmental conflict in the United States was partly caused by policy feedback from the United States' haphazard health-care financing arrangements.
“This outcome was by no means foreordained.Rather, it emerged partly because of policy feedback caused by the United States' haphazard health-care financing arrangements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
As initially designed, the Affordable Care Act required states to extend Medicaid coverage to all uninsured individuals with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level.
“As initially designed, the ACA required states to extend Medicaid coverage to all uninsured individuals with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This policy feedback effect relates to the nature of Canadian federalism, in which executive federalism and direct bargaining between Ottawa and the provinces are central.
“This policy feedback effect relates to the nature of Canadian federalism, in which executive federalism and direct bargaining between Ottawa and the provinces”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Because of pre-existing federal subsidies for employer-sponsored insurance arrangements, numerous attempts to create a national, universal health-care plan in the United States failed.
“Because of pre-existing federal subsidies for employer-sponsored insurance arrangements, numerous attempts to create a national, universal health-care plan were met with failure (Hacker, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hacker, 2004 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Self-undermining policy feedback led to a clear shift from decentralization to recentralization in the Mexican health-care system.
“Here we can clearly talk about self-undermining policy feedback (Jacobs & Weaver, 2015), leading to a clear shift from decentralization to recentralization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jacobs & Weaver, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The fractured U.S. approach to financing health care created gaps into which a growing number of Americans fell.
“One reason for this is that the fractured U.S. approach to financing health care has created gaps into which a growing number of Americans have fallen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Under Canada's stable and self-reinforcing policy regime, provincial governments bore greater fiscal risk in terms of the transfer keeping up with health-sector inflation.
“Under this stable and self-reinforcing policy regime, although no longer subject to detailed monitoring by the federal government, especially under the federal Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act, provincial governments bore greater fiscal risk in terms of the transfer keeping up with health-sector inflation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As gaps opened, Medicaid offered policy advocates and lawmakers a unique opportunity structure, unleashing a self-reinforcing feedback effect.
“As gaps opened, the Medicaid program offered policy advocates and lawmakers a unique opportunity structure, which unleashed a self-reinforcing feedback effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The three cases point to an interaction between policy feedback and varieties of federalism.
“These three cases point once again to the interaction between policy feedback, which concerns the impact of specific policies on the politics of health and social policy, and varieties of federalism”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Federations with a strong subnational authoritarian legacy and weak subnational governing capacity may experience instability in how authority for health care is allocated across levels of government.
“For example, federations with a strong subnational authoritarian legacy and weak subnational governing capacity may experience instability in how authority for health care is allocated across levels of government.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The character of federations is deeply affected by the policy choices of politicians.
“our analysis submits that there are numerous opportunities to see the character of federations as a dependent variable, too, one which is deeply affected by the policy choices of politicians.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Executive federalism and direct bargaining between the central government and subnational units is self-reinforcing.
“executive federalism and direct bargaining between the central government and subnational units is both self-reinforcing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The evidence in the study suggests that particular federal structures may unleash distinctive political dynamics that affect how social policies are made.
“Even so, the evidence here suggests that particular federal structures may unleash distinctive political dynamics that affect how social policies are made.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In Canada, a long-accepted federalist structure generates a mode of intergovernmental politics and bargaining that prevents needed policy change.
“Finally, as illustrated in the case of Canada, a long-accepted federalist structure generates a mode of intergovernmental politics and bargaining preventing needed policy change”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since the Canada Health Transfer is the federal government's largest expenditure after national defense, it will likely be cut back like what was done in the public financing crisis of the mid-1990s.
“Since the Canada Health Transfer is the federal government's largest expenditure after national defense, it will likely be cut back like what was done in the public financing crisis of the mid-1990s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Unlike in Mexico and the United States, the pandemic crisis did not generate self-undermining policy feedback effects that weakened the existing federal health transfer policy in Canada.
“In other words, unlike in Mexico and the United States, the pandemic crisis did not generate self-undermining policy feedback effects that weakened the existing federal health transfer policy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Federations with highly nationalized and polarized politics may see subnational cleavages in access to social benefits along partisan lines, even during periods of programmatic expansion.
“By contrast, federations with highly nationalized and polarized politics may see subnational cleavages in access to social benefits along partisan lines, even during periods of programmatic expansion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In Canada, a long-accepted federalist structure eventually contributes to self-undermining policy feedback and demands for change.
“and eventually contributes to self-undermining policy feedback and demands for change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The dynamics of first ministers' meetings stripped the health file from federal and provincial health ministers and produced a single-minded focus on money and jurisdiction to the detriment of other pressing issues.
“This effectively stripped the health file from federal and provincial health ministers and produced a single-minded focus on money and jurisdiction to the detriment of other pressing issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Canadian federalism is characterized by executive federalism and direct bargaining between Ottawa and the provinces as especially central.
“feedback effect relates to the nature of Canadian federalism, in which executive federalism and direct bargaining between Ottawa and the provinces are especially central.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Executive federalism and direct bargaining between the central government and subnational units is much more prevalent in Canada than in the United States and Mexico.
“and much more prevalent in Canada than in the United States and Mexico.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Policy legacies can, over time, generate new patterns of intergovernmental politics through both self-reinforcing and self-undermining feedback effects.
“our analysis suggests that scholarship on how federalism varies across countries should be more attentive to how policy legacies can, over time, generate new patterns of intergovernmental politics through both self-reinforcing and self-undermining feedback effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 24
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe main feature of the Mexican health system is fragmentation of the provision and funding of health-care services, resulting in high inequalities in quality, cost, and access to health care across different groups of the population and states.
“In spite of different reforms, the main feature of the Mexican health system is the fragmentation of the provision and funding of health-care services, resulting in high inequalities in the quality, cost, and access to health-care across different groups of the population and states (Murayama & Martínez, 2016;Ordóñez Barba & Ramírez Sánchez, 2018;Urquieta-Salomón & Villarreal, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Murayama & Martínez, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ordóñez Barba & Ramírez Sánchez, 2018 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Urquieta-Salomón & Villarreal, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Families First Coronavirus Response Act increased the federal Medicaid matching rate to states by 6.2 percentage points and temporarily prevented states from imposing new restrictive measures on access to the program.
“which increased federal matching rate to states by 6.2 percentage points and temporarily prevented states from imposing any new restrictive measures with regard to accessing the program.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationMexico's fiscal arrangement led to a reduction in states' revenue collection and an increase in their reliance on federal transfers to finance health and social services, generating large vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances.
“This fiscal arrangement led to a reduction in the states' revenue collection and an increase in their reliance on federal transfers to finance health and social services and other services, generating large vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances (Diaz-Cayeros, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Diaz-Cayeros, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAlthough Seguro Popular was funded through federal and state contributions plus cost sharing by those insured, the main source of financing was federal, representing up to 86% of the Seguro Popular budget in 2012.
“Although SP was funded through federal and state contributions plus cost sharing by those insured, the main source of financing was federal in nature, representing up to 86% of the SP budget in 2012 (Murayama & Martínez, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murayama & Martínez, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPresident Andrés Manuel López Obrador openly rejected the neoliberal design of SP and criticized the failure of state governments to deliver health-care services in a cost-efficient manner featuring the proper and transparent management of public funds.
“President Andres Manuel López Obrador openly rejected the neoliberal design of SP and criticized the failure of state governments to deliver health-care services in a cost-efficient manner featuring the proper and transparent management of public funds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn 2020, after almost two decades of decentralization in health care, the federal government embarked on a process of further centralizing health reform and eliminated SP.
“In 2020, after almost two decades of decentralization in health care, the federal government embarked on a process of further centralizing health reform and eliminated SP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIn February 2023, the CHT was increased by 5% annually for the following five years with the escalator reverting to 3% in the final five years of the deal after considerable lobbying by provincial governments.
“In February 2023, the CHT was increased by 5% annually for the following five years with the escalator reverting to 3% in the final five years of the deal after considerable lobbying by provincial governments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAlthough the urgency of provincial premiers' demand has diminished since an escalator formula has been re-established, First Ministers' Meetings continue to be dominated by health funding, crowding out other potentially important policy issues on the federal-provincial agenda.
“Although the urgency of demand by provincial premiers has diminished since an escalator formula has been re-established, First Ministers' Meetings continue to be dominated by the subject of health funding, thus crowding out other potentially important policy issues on the federal-provincial agenda.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFederal increases in provincial transfers have not led to any significant improvements in provincial health systems, most notably through longer wait lists for elective surgery, over-crowded emergency departments, and the inability of Canadians to get more prompt access to family doctors and specialists.
“At the same time, it has become clear that federal increases in provincial transfers have not led to any significant improvements in provincial health systems, most notably through longer wait lists for elective surgery, over-crowded emergency departments, and the inability of Canadians to get more prompt access to family doctors and specialists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMexico has been the most centralized of the three federations, Canada the least, even though Canada's constitution is more centralist than the U.S. Constitution.
“As Kincaid and Cole (2011, p. 54) note, “Mexico has been the most centralized of the three federations, whereas Canada has been the least, even though its constitution is more centralist than the U.S. Constitution.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kincaid and Cole (2011, p. 54) source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCanada is heavily weighted to executive federalism, due to the lack of a democratically elected Senate seeking to represent regional interests and the overlap between the executive and legislative branches in a federalized Westminster parliamentary system.
“For example, in contrast to the United States and Mexico, Canada is heavily weighted to executive federalism.This is due to the lack of a democratically elected Senate seeking to represent regional interests and the overlap between the executive and legislative branches in a federalized Westminster parliamentary system”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn 2014, the Mexican federal government introduced changes to regain more control of resource management, implying an implicit recognition of irregularities and overall poor performance in state governments' management of funds.
“In 2014, the federal government introduced some changes to regain more control of the management of resources, which implied an implicit recognition of irregularities and overall poor performance in the management of the funds by state governments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTensions over SP funds stem partly from the shared control of SP funds between the federal and state governments, as well as the misuse of resources by governors, which eventually led to recentralization changes of SP in 2014.
“These tensions stem partly from the shared control of SP funds between the federal and state governments, as well as the misuse of resources by governors, which eventually led to recentralization changes of SP in 2014.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 1998, Mexico modified its law of fiscal coordination to establish five earmarked federal transfers for the states, including specific funds for health care; in return, state governments agreed that the federal government would further concentrate its capacity for taxation.
“In 1998, as part of decentralization reforms, the law of fiscal coordination was modified and it established five earmarked federal transfers for the states, including specific funds for health care; in return, state governments agreed that the federal government would further concentrate its capacity for taxation (Diaz-Cayeros, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Diaz-Cayeros, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe last reform of the Mexican health-care system was initiated in 2020 with the elimination of Seguro Popular, due in part to self-undermining policy feedback from its design and implementation.
“The last reform of the Mexican health-care system was initiated in 2020 with the elimination of SP, which was due, in part, to the self-undermining policy feedback from its design and implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of major shift in Canada's intergovernmental structure for health-care funding is directly related to the relative lack of self-undermining feedback effects, pointing to strong institutional stability.
“Third, in contrast to the United States and Mexico, Canada did not witness any major shift in the basic intergovernmental structure of fiscal federalism for health-care funding, a situation directly related to the relative lack of self-undermining feedback effects, which points to strong institutional stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMedicaid's design incentivized programmatic growth but also contained elements resulting in self-undermining feedback that limited the availability of benefits in some states and limited expansion of eligibility beyond the working poor.
“Yet if Medicaid's design incentivized programmatic growth, it also contained elements that resulted in self-undermining feedback that both limited the availability of benefits in some states and limited the expansion of eligibility beyond the working poor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis fiscal risk translated eventually into persistent provincial demands for federal increases to health transfers, dominating federal-provincial relations since the late 1990s and crowding out other important matters.
“This fiscal risk translated eventually into persistent provincial demands for federal increases to health transfers to the point that they have dominated federal-provincial relations since the late 1990s to the point that this subject has crowded out other, potentially important matters that first ministers should have addressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWhile the federal government has played a more vital role in structuring social programs, it has not rendered federalism irrelevant; rather, it has helped make the states into nationalized sites of conflict over public policy.
“While the federal government has, in turn, played a more vital role in structuring social programs, it has not rendered federalism irrelevant as a force in politics.Rather, it has helped make the states into nationalized sites of conflict over public policy (Béland et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Béland et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIssues with Seguro Popular's design and implementation, along with the federal government's push against neoliberalism and other political and institutional factors, created self-undermining policy feedback that contributed to the policy's ending in 2020.
“These issues, as well as the federal government's push against neoliberalism, in interaction with other political and institutional factors, created self-undermining policy feedback, which contributed to the policy's ending in 2020, as explained below.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile the CHT seems highly path dependent due to the institutional nature of executive federalism in Canada, there is some evidence of self-undermining policy feedback.
“While the CHT seems highly path dependent due to the institutional nature of executive federalism in Canada, there is some evidence of self-undermining policy feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFederalism as such does not exert a consistent effect on the generosity of social programs or the extent to which social policies de-commodify labor.
“Federalism as such does not exert a consistent effect on, for example, the generosity or social programs or the extent to which social policies de-commodify labor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greer and others (2023)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe relationship between federal structures and social policy dynamics is not straightforward.
“As Greer and others (2023) suggest, the relationship between federal structures and social policy dynamics is not straightforward.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greer and others (2023)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPolicy feedback effects shape the character of intergovernmental politics, which is a central feature of the varieties of federalism.
“our contribution shows how policy feedback effects shape the character of intergovernmental politics, which is a central feature of the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOttawa will have two contrasting choices: create a new transfer mechanism with money conditional on new national access and quality standards that go beyond the current Canada Health Act standards, or facilitate the emergence of a parallel private sector by not enforcing the standards under the Canada Health Act or eliminating both the Canada Health Act and the CHT.
“In a manner similar to the provincial governments, Ottawa will have two contrasting choices.The first will be to create a new transfer mechanism with money conditional on new national access and quality standards that go beyond the current Canada Health Act standards.The second option would be to facilitate the emergence of a parallel private sector by not enforcing the standards under the Canada”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe federal government was able to buy some time through temporary funding that then allowed a new ten-year-deal on the CHT to be accepted by the provinces immediately after the pandemic.
“Instead, the federal government was able to buy some time through temporary funding that then allowed a new ten-year-deal on the CHT to be accepted by the provinces immediately after the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Canada section counts two major funding changes, then identifies a third
MinorThe section says there have been only two major changes to federal funding for universal health coverage since its introduction, but later explicitly calls the 2004 agreement a third major change.
“Since shared-cost federal funding for UHC was first introduced in the late 1950s, there have only been two major changes.”
“Due to the success of the provincial strategy, the federal government negotiated a series of accords in the early 2000s, culminating in the Ten-Year-Deal among federal, provincial, and territorial (FPT) first ministers in 2004, ushering in the third major change.”
Cites
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796 · see citing works
When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change
Pierson, P. (1993) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2950710 · Cited by 2,600 · see citing works
Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States
Skocpol, T. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674043725 · Cited by 2,439 · see citing works
HACKER, J. S. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404001121 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
(1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528125 · Cited by 1,450 · see citing works
Health Insurance Coverage in the United States
(2002) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv11smv14.6 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Greene, K. F. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511509803 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
When Policies Undo Themselves: Self‐Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change
Jacobs, A. M., & Weaver, R. K. (2014) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12101 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Fragmented Welfare States: Federal Institutions and the Development of Social Policy
PIERSON, P. (1995) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.1995.tb00223.x · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Michener, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108224987 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Federalism and the Welfare State
(2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491856 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Varieties of Policy Feedback Research: Looking Backward, Moving Forward
Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12340 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Politics of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Reproduction in Argentina and Mexico
Giraudy, A. (2010) · Journal of Politics in Latin America · doi:10.1177/1866802x1000200203 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Medicaid Work Requirements — Results from the First Year in Arkansas
Sommers, B. D., Goldman, A. L., Blendon, R. J., Orav, E. J., & Epstein, A. M. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr1901772 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
(2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199652990.001.0001 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Béland, D., Campbell, A. L., & Weaver, R. K. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108938914 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationBottom-Up Challenges to National Democracy: Mexico's (Legal) Subnational Authoritarian Enclaves
Benton, A. L. (2012) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.5129/001041512800078931 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Rocco, P., Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2020) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2020.1783793 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationRestructuring Health Reform, Mexican Style
Reich, M. R. (2020) · Health Systems & Reform · doi:10.1080/23288604.2020.1763114 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The New Federalism of Mexico's Party System
Cantú, F., & DESPOSATO, S. W. (2012) · Journal of Politics in Latin America · doi:10.1177/1866802x1200400201 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Citizen Attitudes Toward Issues of Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States
Kincaid, J., & Cole, R. L. (2011) · Publius: The Journal of Federalism · doi:10.1093/publius/pjq035 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Twenty-Five Years of Convoluted Health Reforms in Mexico
Homedes, N., & Ugalde, A. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000124 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Tuohy, C. J. (2018) · University of Toronto Press eBooks · doi:10.3138/9781487515362 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Evaluating the Implementation of Mexico's Health Reform: The Case of Seguro Popular
Nígenda, G., Wirtz, V. J., González-Robledo, L. M., & Reich, M. R. (2015) · Health Systems & Reform · doi:10.1080/23288604.2015.1031336 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Health Policy and Federalism: A Comparative Perspective on Multi-Level Governance
Uzych, L. (2003) · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Policy Feedback and the Politics of the Affordable Care Act
Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2018) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12286 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative Health Care Federalism
Fierlbeck, K. A., & Palley, H. A. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315573076 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Oberlander, J. (2006) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.w96 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Federalism and the making of America
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-4076 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Urquieta-Salomón, J. E., & Villarreal, H. J. (2016) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czv015 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Governance and Public Policy in Canada: A View from the Provinces
Atkinson, M. (2013) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Mexico’s Seguro Popular: Achievements and Challenges
Ruiz, A. C., Ratsch, A. E. O., & Martinez, G. (2018) · Health Systems & Reform · doi:10.1080/23288604.2018.1488505 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lazar, H., Lavis, J. N., Forest, P., & Church, J. (2013) · McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781553393399 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
COVID-19, Federalism, and Health Care Financing in Canada, the United States, and Mexico
Béland, D., Marchildon, G. P., Medrano, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2020.1848353 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationMedicare and Medicaid: the past as prologue.
Berkowitz, E. D. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Béland, D., & Myles, J. (2012) · International Journal of Social Welfare · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00838.x · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationState Politics And The Uneven Fate Of Medicaid Expansion
Rocco, P., Keller, A. C., & Kelly, A. S. (2020) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01414 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationAllin, S., Fitzpatrick, T., Marchildon, G. P., et al. (2021) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133121000220 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationBéland, D., & Lecours, A. (2014) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x14000038 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationThéret, B. (1999) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00209 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Medicaid and fiscal federalism during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Clemens, J., Ippolito, B., & Veuger, S. (2021) · Public Budgeting & Finance · doi:10.1111/pbaf.12287 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Putting Federalism in Its Place
Greer, S. L., Béland, D., Lecours, A., & Dubin, K. A. (2022) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.12237580 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationFederalism and Decentralization in Health Care
(2018) · University of Toronto Press eBooks · doi:10.3138/9781487513566 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Federalism and democracy: the case of minority nations – a federal deficit
Requejo, F. (2010) · Federal Democracies · doi:10.4324/9780203857571-21 · Cited by 14
A Needs-Based Allocation Formula for Canada Health Transfer
Marchildon, G. P., & Mou, H. (2014) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.3138/cpp.2013-052 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationCátedra PwC de Investigación de Sistemas de Salud, U. A. M., González-Block, M. Á., Figueroa, A., et al. (2016) · Salud Pública de México · doi:10.21149/spm.v58i5.8242 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Política de asignación de recursos del Seguro Popular: análisis y recomendaciones
Martínez, G., & México., I. T. A. D. M. (2016) · Salud Pública de México · doi:10.21149/spm.v58i5.8248 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Expanding health care coverage in Canada: a dramatic shift in the debate
Marchildon, G. P., & Tuohy, C. H. (2021) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133121000062 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationFlamand, L., & Jaimes, C. M. (2015) · Foro Internacional · doi:10.24201/fi.v55i1.2266 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Changing Conception of Pension Rights in Canada, Mexico and the United States
Marier, P. (2008) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00612.x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Subnational Electoral Contexts and Corruption in Mexico
Faughnan, B. M., Hiskey, J. T., & Revey, S. D. (2014) · Journal of Politics in Latin America · doi:10.1177/1866802x1400600102 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
[Acquisition of medicines in the Seguro Popular: inefficiency and inequity].
Murayama-Rendón, C. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sistema de salud mexicano: de la descentralización hacia la re‐centralización
Magaly, M. (2023) · Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Social · doi:10.22201/iij.24487899e.2023.36.17880 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
La corrupción en la burocracia estatal mexicana
Zazueta, I. M. S., & Cortez, W. W. (2015) · Revista de Economía Institucional · doi:10.18601/01245996.v17n33.07 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
La seguridad social en México a dos décadas de las reformas privatizadoras. Balance y perspectivas
Ordóñez Barba, G., & Ramírez Sánchez, M. Á. (2018) · Espiral estudios sobre Estado y sociedad · doi:10.32870/espiral.v25i73.6247 · Cited by 3
Del Seguro Popular al Insabi: ¿Por qué recentralizar el gasto público en salud en México?
Sovilla, B., & Díaz Sánchez, Á. M. (2022) · Gestión y Política Pública · doi:10.60583/gypp.v31i2.1257 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The dimensions of competition in the Mexican party system (1979-2012)
Jiménez, O. F. D., & Ávila, I. V. (2015) · Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Federalism, Fiscal Authority, and Centralization in Latin America
BeerCaroline (2015) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Serra, G. (2017) · Revista Mexicana de Estudios Electorales · doi:10.54505/rmee.v1i17.190 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mexican Federalism in the Pandemic
de la Cruz, E. E. R., & Granados, D. P. G. (2021) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80117-165-620211006 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Del dicho al hecho: El seguro popular, su presupuesto y la atención a la salud materna en Chiapas
Sureste., C., Carrasco-Gómez, M., Argüello-Avendaño, H. E., et al. (2017) · EntreDiversidades Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades · doi:10.31644/ed.9.2017.a06 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Medicaid and Fiscal Federalism During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Clemens, J., Ippolito, B., & Veuger, S. (2021) · doi:10.3386/w28670
Rocco, P., Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3615329
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Arellano David, 2015, Política de Salud y Desempeño Organizacional: el Seguro Popular en México
- Béland Daniel, 2016, Obamacare Wars
- Brooks Tricia, 2021, Loss of Medicaid after the PHE Will Likely Exceed 15 Million Estimated by Urban
- Buettgens Matthew, 2022, What Will Happen to Medicaid Enrollees' Health Coverage after the Public Health Emergency?
- Flamand Laura, 2014, Seguro popular y federalismo. Un análisis de política pública
- Gervasoni Carkis, 2016, Poderes y democracias: la política subnacional en México, 47
- Immergut Ellen L., 1992, Health Politics: Interest and Institutions in Western Europe
- Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar (INSABI), 2020, Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), 2023, IMSS‐Bienestar brinda servicios de salud a 21.8 millones de personas sin seguridad social; se suman entidades en 2023
- Lecours André, 2020, Fiscal Federalism: Pierre Trudeau as an Agent of Decentralization Agent, Supreme Court Law Review, 99, 77
- MACPAC (Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission), 2022, Most Current MACStats Compiled
- Marchildon Gregory P., 2019, Modernizing Canada: Louis St‐Laurent's Politics and Policies
- Méndez de Hoyos Irma, 2016, Poderes y democracias: la política subnacional en México
- Mendoza Alfonso, 2019, Los Incentivos Perversos del Federalismo Fiscal Mexicano
- Murayama Ciro, 2016, Hacia un Sistema Nacional Público de Salud en México, 19
- Pérez B. Noel, 2019, Los Incentivos del Federalismo Fiscal Mexicano, 19
- Requejo Ferran, 2010, Federal Democracies, 275
- Rocco Philip, 2021, The Waning of Pandemic Time, 3 Streams
- 10.54505/somee.rmee.2017.1.17.a7 · DOI
- Snyder Laura, 2013, Premiums and Cost‐Sharing in Medicaid: A Review of Research Literature
- Thompson Frank, 2012, Medicaid Politics
- Tolbert Jennifer, 2023, 10 Things to Know about the Unwinding of the Medicaid Continuous Enrollment Provision, Kaiser Family Foundation Blog
- Tuohy Carolyn H., 2020, Long Term Care in the Canadian Federation: COVID‐19 as a Focusing Event
- Uribe Gómez Mónica, 2013, Continuity and Change in Mexico's Public Health System, Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 21, 135
- Watts Ronald L., 1999, The Spending Power in Federal Systems: A Comparative Study
- Weaver R. Kent, 1993, Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the U.S. and Abroad
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ngondwe, P., & Tefera, G. M. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13030313 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
COVID-19 and territorial politics: towards a redefinition of Spanish intergovernmental relations?
Hernández-Moreno, J. J., & Harguindéguy, J.-B. P. (2024) · Regional Studies Regional Science · doi:10.1080/21681376.2024.2370420 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…complexity of the policy, the interconnection between institutions, political authority and power asymmetries, the governance created by previous institutional arrangements or the increase in the state capacities of high – and low-level officials, among others (Béland, 2016; Béland et al., 2024).”
Papillon, M. (2024) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2024.2386363 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
From Biobank to “Bio-Think-Tank”: Functional Evolution of UK Biobank in Public Health Policy Making
Yin, J., & Flahault, A. (2026) · Public health reviews · doi:10.3389/phrs.2026.1609119
“Judicial and administrative discretion and enforcement factors of legal policies need to be incorporated into the theoretical framework [24], a range of factors such as inter-state competition and national security may hinder or promote the behavior of state actors [25–27].”
Doctors vs. doctors: intra-associational conflict and federalism
Stolfi, F. (2026) · Interest Groups & Advocacy · doi:10.1057/s41309-026-00260-6
“Australia is a highly centralised federation while Canada is very decentralised (Fenna 2019; Béland et al. 2024).”
Cultural biases, agenda setting, and the regulation of policy processes
Bandelow, N. C., Hornung, J., & Schröder, I. (2024) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12613
Summary of articles in the February 2024 issue of Politics & Policy and a few editor's tips
Norman, E. R. (2024) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12585
- Authors
- Béland, D., Marchildon, G. P., Medrano, A., & Rocco, P.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (MX)
- Marquette University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Béland, Daniel
- Venue
- Politics & Policy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-01-24
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-69
- ISSN
- 1555-5623 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-1346
- OpenAlex
- W4391169630
- Semantic Scholar
- 9b7891d4142ba76fcbb9a19ad83d3b8f9bb70205
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Politics & Policy (publishedVersion)
- e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- health care financing, fiscal federalism, policy feedback, intergovernmental relations, vertical fiscal imbalance, horizontal fiscal imbalance, public health funding, institutional legacy, subnational governments, United States, Mexico, Canada, North America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review