Cited by 7Political Systems and GovernanceLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationHealthcare Policy and Management

Policy feedback, varieties of federalism, and the politics of health‐care funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada

Open access
Béland, Daniel, Marchildon, Gregory P., Medrano, Anahely, Rocco, Philip·2024·Politics & Policy

Abstract

Abstract Long before the COVID‐19 pandemic, health‐care spending became a key policy issue across the OECD. Comparing recent institutional trends in public health‐care financing in three federal countries—Canada, the United States, and Mexico—this article explores the political struggles over fiscal federalism in health care related to both vertical and horizontal imbalances that can generate regional tensions and pit subnational governments against one another and, especially, against the national government. Grounded in a historical institutionalist perspective, the article shows how different institutional legacies shape current conflicts over federal health‐care funding in these three highly dissimilar federal countries. Such an analysis stresses the role of policy feedback in social politics and the enduring “varieties of federalism” in North American public health‐care funding. More specifically, the article shows how the distinct nature of policy feedback effects in the United States, Mexico, and Canada helps explain why the two former countries recently witnessed major changes in intergovernmental relations over fiscal federalism for health care while the latter did not. Related Articles Bode, Ingo, and Jorge E. Culebro Moreno. 2018. “Paradoxical Internationalization: Regulatory Reforms in the Mexican Health‐Care System through the Lens of European Experience.” Politics & Policy 46(4): 678–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12268 . Lauby, Fanny, and Christopher J. McKinley. 2023. “Factors of Early COVID‐19 Prevention Policy Engagement in France and the United States.” Politics & Policy 51(5): 830–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12556 . Luccisano, Lucy, and Amy Romagnoli. 2007. “Comparing Public Social Provision and Citizenship in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: Are There Implications for a North American Space?” Politics & Policy 35(4): 716–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2007.00082.x .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/polp.12575

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The United States lies somewhere in the middle of Mexico and Canada in terms of fiscal and political decentralization.

    “The United States lies somewhere in the middle of the two countries in terms of fiscal and political decentralization (Requejo, 2010;Watts, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Requejo, 2010 source

      Table 2 (Additional information; page unavailable) places the United States between Mexico and Canada on the overall decentralization scale: 14.5, versus 5 and 16.5. Section 3.2 says that scale combines political powers with an economic-decentralization measure, but the available figures do not establish the same three-country ordering for fiscal decentralization separately. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Watts, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    The 2023 appropriations legislation's unwinding of emergency Medicaid expansion was projected to result in the disenrollment of as many as 14 million people from Medicaid coverage in 2023.

    “This policy change was projected to result in the disenrollment of as many as 14 million people from Medicaid coverage in 2023 (Tolbert & Ammula, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tolbert & Ammula, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    Although REPSS were designed to exist outside state health agencies to separate financing from provision, they were in practice administratively and politically dependent on state governments.

    “Although REPSS were designed to exist outside of the state health agencies, in order to separate financing from provision, as a mechanism to improve the efficiency and quality of service delivery, they were, in practice, administratively (and politically) dependent on state governments (Flamand & Moreno-Jaimes, 2014, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Flamand & Moreno-Jaimes, 2014, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    There has been a massive increase in fiscal transfers from the federal government to state governments in the United States.

    “The result has been a massive increase in fiscal transfers from federal to state governments (Office of Management and Budget, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Office of Management and Budget, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    Medicaid enrollment increased by nearly 25% between February 2020 and January 2022.

    “Medicaid enrollment increased by nearly 25% between February 2020 and January 2022 (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. 24
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The main feature of the Mexican health system is fragmentation of the provision and funding of health-care services, resulting in high inequalities in quality, cost, and access to health care across different groups of the population and states.

    “In spite of different reforms, the main feature of the Mexican health system is the fragmentation of the provision and funding of health-care services, resulting in high inequalities in the quality, cost, and access to health-care across different groups of the population and states (Murayama & Martínez, 2016;Ordóñez Barba & Ramírez Sánchez, 2018;Urquieta-Salomón & Villarreal, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Murayama & Martínez, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ordóñez Barba & Ramírez Sánchez, 2018 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Urquieta-Salomón & Villarreal, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Families First Coronavirus Response Act increased the federal Medicaid matching rate to states by 6.2 percentage points and temporarily prevented states from imposing new restrictive measures on access to the program.

    “which increased federal matching rate to states by 6.2 percentage points and temporarily prevented states from imposing any new restrictive measures with regard to accessing the program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Mexico's fiscal arrangement led to a reduction in states' revenue collection and an increase in their reliance on federal transfers to finance health and social services, generating large vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances.

    “This fiscal arrangement led to a reduction in the states' revenue collection and an increase in their reliance on federal transfers to finance health and social services and other services, generating large vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances (Diaz-Cayeros, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diaz-Cayeros, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Although Seguro Popular was funded through federal and state contributions plus cost sharing by those insured, the main source of financing was federal, representing up to 86% of the Seguro Popular budget in 2012.

    “Although SP was funded through federal and state contributions plus cost sharing by those insured, the main source of financing was federal in nature, representing up to 86% of the SP budget in 2012 (Murayama & Martínez, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murayama & Martínez, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    President Andrés Manuel López Obrador openly rejected the neoliberal design of SP and criticized the failure of state governments to deliver health-care services in a cost-efficient manner featuring the proper and transparent management of public funds.

    “President Andres Manuel López Obrador openly rejected the neoliberal design of SP and criticized the failure of state governments to deliver health-care services in a cost-efficient manner featuring the proper and transparent management of public funds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In 2020, after almost two decades of decentralization in health care, the federal government embarked on a process of further centralizing health reform and eliminated SP.

    “In 2020, after almost two decades of decentralization in health care, the federal government embarked on a process of further centralizing health reform and eliminated SP.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In February 2023, the CHT was increased by 5% annually for the following five years with the escalator reverting to 3% in the final five years of the deal after considerable lobbying by provincial governments.

    “In February 2023, the CHT was increased by 5% annually for the following five years with the escalator reverting to 3% in the final five years of the deal after considerable lobbying by provincial governments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Although the urgency of provincial premiers' demand has diminished since an escalator formula has been re-established, First Ministers' Meetings continue to be dominated by health funding, crowding out other potentially important policy issues on the federal-provincial agenda.

    “Although the urgency of demand by provincial premiers has diminished since an escalator formula has been re-established, First Ministers' Meetings continue to be dominated by the subject of health funding, thus crowding out other potentially important policy issues on the federal-provincial agenda.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Federal increases in provincial transfers have not led to any significant improvements in provincial health systems, most notably through longer wait lists for elective surgery, over-crowded emergency departments, and the inability of Canadians to get more prompt access to family doctors and specialists.

    “At the same time, it has become clear that federal increases in provincial transfers have not led to any significant improvements in provincial health systems, most notably through longer wait lists for elective surgery, over-crowded emergency departments, and the inability of Canadians to get more prompt access to family doctors and specialists.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mexico has been the most centralized of the three federations, Canada the least, even though Canada's constitution is more centralist than the U.S. Constitution.

    “As Kincaid and Cole (2011, p. 54) note, “Mexico has been the most centralized of the three federations, whereas Canada has been the least, even though its constitution is more centralist than the U.S. Constitution.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kincaid and Cole (2011, p. 54) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Canada is heavily weighted to executive federalism, due to the lack of a democratically elected Senate seeking to represent regional interests and the overlap between the executive and legislative branches in a federalized Westminster parliamentary system.

    “For example, in contrast to the United States and Mexico, Canada is heavily weighted to executive federalism.This is due to the lack of a democratically elected Senate seeking to represent regional interests and the overlap between the executive and legislative branches in a federalized Westminster parliamentary system”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In 2014, the Mexican federal government introduced changes to regain more control of resource management, implying an implicit recognition of irregularities and overall poor performance in state governments' management of funds.

    “In 2014, the federal government introduced some changes to regain more control of the management of resources, which implied an implicit recognition of irregularities and overall poor performance in the management of the funds by state governments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tensions over SP funds stem partly from the shared control of SP funds between the federal and state governments, as well as the misuse of resources by governors, which eventually led to recentralization changes of SP in 2014.

    “These tensions stem partly from the shared control of SP funds between the federal and state governments, as well as the misuse of resources by governors, which eventually led to recentralization changes of SP in 2014.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 1998, Mexico modified its law of fiscal coordination to establish five earmarked federal transfers for the states, including specific funds for health care; in return, state governments agreed that the federal government would further concentrate its capacity for taxation.

    “In 1998, as part of decentralization reforms, the law of fiscal coordination was modified and it established five earmarked federal transfers for the states, including specific funds for health care; in return, state governments agreed that the federal government would further concentrate its capacity for taxation (Diaz-Cayeros, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diaz-Cayeros, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The last reform of the Mexican health-care system was initiated in 2020 with the elimination of Seguro Popular, due in part to self-undermining policy feedback from its design and implementation.

    “The last reform of the Mexican health-care system was initiated in 2020 with the elimination of SP, which was due, in part, to the self-undermining policy feedback from its design and implementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of major shift in Canada's intergovernmental structure for health-care funding is directly related to the relative lack of self-undermining feedback effects, pointing to strong institutional stability.

    “Third, in contrast to the United States and Mexico, Canada did not witness any major shift in the basic intergovernmental structure of fiscal federalism for health-care funding, a situation directly related to the relative lack of self-undermining feedback effects, which points to strong institutional stability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Medicaid's design incentivized programmatic growth but also contained elements resulting in self-undermining feedback that limited the availability of benefits in some states and limited expansion of eligibility beyond the working poor.

    “Yet if Medicaid's design incentivized programmatic growth, it also contained elements that resulted in self-undermining feedback that both limited the availability of benefits in some states and limited the expansion of eligibility beyond the working poor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This fiscal risk translated eventually into persistent provincial demands for federal increases to health transfers, dominating federal-provincial relations since the late 1990s and crowding out other important matters.

    “This fiscal risk translated eventually into persistent provincial demands for federal increases to health transfers to the point that they have dominated federal-provincial relations since the late 1990s to the point that this subject has crowded out other, potentially important matters that first ministers should have addressed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    While the federal government has played a more vital role in structuring social programs, it has not rendered federalism irrelevant; rather, it has helped make the states into nationalized sites of conflict over public policy.

    “While the federal government has, in turn, played a more vital role in structuring social programs, it has not rendered federalism irrelevant as a force in politics.Rather, it has helped make the states into nationalized sites of conflict over public policy (Béland et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Béland et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Issues with Seguro Popular's design and implementation, along with the federal government's push against neoliberalism and other political and institutional factors, created self-undermining policy feedback that contributed to the policy's ending in 2020.

    “These issues, as well as the federal government's push against neoliberalism, in interaction with other political and institutional factors, created self-undermining policy feedback, which contributed to the policy's ending in 2020, as explained below.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While the CHT seems highly path dependent due to the institutional nature of executive federalism in Canada, there is some evidence of self-undermining policy feedback.

    “While the CHT seems highly path dependent due to the institutional nature of executive federalism in Canada, there is some evidence of self-undermining policy feedback.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Federalism as such does not exert a consistent effect on the generosity of social programs or the extent to which social policies de-commodify labor.

    “Federalism as such does not exert a consistent effect on, for example, the generosity or social programs or the extent to which social policies de-commodify labor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Greer and others (2023)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The relationship between federal structures and social policy dynamics is not straightforward.

    “As Greer and others (2023) suggest, the relationship between federal structures and social policy dynamics is not straightforward.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Greer and others (2023)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Policy feedback effects shape the character of intergovernmental politics, which is a central feature of the varieties of federalism.

    “our contribution shows how policy feedback effects shape the character of intergovernmental politics, which is a central feature of the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ottawa will have two contrasting choices: create a new transfer mechanism with money conditional on new national access and quality standards that go beyond the current Canada Health Act standards, or facilitate the emergence of a parallel private sector by not enforcing the standards under the Canada Health Act or eliminating both the Canada Health Act and the CHT.

    “In a manner similar to the provincial governments, Ottawa will have two contrasting choices.The first will be to create a new transfer mechanism with money conditional on new national access and quality standards that go beyond the current Canada Health Act standards.The second option would be to facilitate the emergence of a parallel private sector by not enforcing the standards under the Canada”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The federal government was able to buy some time through temporary funding that then allowed a new ten-year-deal on the CHT to be accepted by the provinces immediately after the pandemic.

    “Instead, the federal government was able to buy some time through temporary funding that then allowed a new ten-year-deal on the CHT to be accepted by the provinces immediately after the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
26 of 26

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Canada section counts two major funding changes, then identifies a third

    Minor

    The section says there have been only two major changes to federal funding for universal health coverage since its introduction, but later explicitly calls the 2004 agreement a third major change.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Arellano David, 2015, Política de Salud y Desempeño Organizacional: el Seguro Popular en México
  2. Béland Daniel, 2016, Obamacare Wars
  3. Brooks Tricia, 2021, Loss of Medicaid after the PHE Will Likely Exceed 15 Million Estimated by Urban
  4. Buettgens Matthew, 2022, What Will Happen to Medicaid Enrollees' Health Coverage after the Public Health Emergency?
  5. Flamand Laura, 2014, Seguro popular y federalismo. Un análisis de política pública
  6. Gervasoni Carkis, 2016, Poderes y democracias: la política subnacional en México, 47
  7. Immergut Ellen L., 1992, Health Politics: Interest and Institutions in Western Europe
  8. Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar (INSABI), 2020, Instituto de Salud para el Bienestar
  9. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), 2023, IMSS‐Bienestar brinda servicios de salud a 21.8 millones de personas sin seguridad social; se suman entidades en 2023
  10. Lecours André, 2020, Fiscal Federalism: Pierre Trudeau as an Agent of Decentralization Agent, Supreme Court Law Review, 99, 77
  11. MACPAC (Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission), 2022, Most Current MACStats Compiled
  12. Marchildon Gregory P., 2019, Modernizing Canada: Louis St‐Laurent's Politics and Policies
  13. Méndez de Hoyos Irma, 2016, Poderes y democracias: la política subnacional en México
  14. Mendoza Alfonso, 2019, Los Incentivos Perversos del Federalismo Fiscal Mexicano
  15. Murayama Ciro, 2016, Hacia un Sistema Nacional Público de Salud en México, 19
  16. Pérez B. Noel, 2019, Los Incentivos del Federalismo Fiscal Mexicano, 19
  17. Requejo Ferran, 2010, Federal Democracies, 275
  18. Rocco Philip, 2021, The Waning of Pandemic Time, 3 Streams
  19. 10.54505/somee.rmee.2017.1.17.a7 · DOI
  20. Snyder Laura, 2013, Premiums and Cost‐Sharing in Medicaid: A Review of Research Literature
  21. Thompson Frank, 2012, Medicaid Politics
  22. Tolbert Jennifer, 2023, 10 Things to Know about the Unwinding of the Medicaid Continuous Enrollment Provision, Kaiser Family Foundation Blog
  23. Tuohy Carolyn H., 2020, Long Term Care in the Canadian Federation: COVID‐19 as a Focusing Event
  24. Uribe Gómez Mónica, 2013, Continuity and Change in Mexico's Public Health System, Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 21, 135
  25. Watts Ronald L., 1999, The Spending Power in Federal Systems: A Comparative Study
  26. Weaver R. Kent, 1993, Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the U.S. and Abroad

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Béland, D., Marchildon, G. P., Medrano, A., & Rocco, P.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (MX)
  • Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
Béland, Daniel
Venue
Politics & Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-24
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
51-69
ISSN
  • 1555-5623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-1346
OpenAlex
W4391169630
Cited by
7
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Politics & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
health care financing, fiscal federalism, policy feedback, intergovernmental relations, vertical fiscal imbalance, horizontal fiscal imbalance, public health funding, institutional legacy, subnational governments, United States, Mexico, Canada, North America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review