The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda
Open accessAbstract
Within recent years, there has been a rapid expansion of the University's role in economic development. This has resulted in University Technology Transfer (UTT) taking place within an increasingly complex network of regional stakeholders. This complexity has resulted in quadruple helix models where the triple helix model of academia, industry and regional government now includes societal based innovation users as a fourth helix. Despite this development, extant research is fragmented and lacks coherent frameworks and conceptualisations which fully depict the dynamic and evolving nature of UTT. Accordingly, this article reviews Mode 2 UTT from a quadruple helix perspective to identify key themes to develop a research agenda which reflects progression from a triple into a quadruple helix ecosystem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4463 · Cited by 7,046
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
Baber, Z., Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076669 · Cited by 4,406
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 · Cited by 2,571
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., et al. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 · Cited by 2,552
'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2009.023374 · Cited by 2,435
Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory
Bozeman, B. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00093-1 · Cited by 1,786
THE CASE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION: PLACE‐BASED VERSUS PLACE‐NEUTRAL APPROACHES*
Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2012) · Journal of Regional Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x · Cited by 1,600
Cited by
The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284 · Cited by 892
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12300 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-07-25
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-24
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W2512358365
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/radm.12228
- The paper
- Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
