The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models
Abstract
Regions are increasingly being viewed as eco‐systemic agglomerations of organizational and institutional entities or stakeholders with socio‐technical, socio‐economic, and socio‐political conflicting as well as converging (co‐opetitive) goals, priorities, expectations, and behaviors that they pursue via entrepreneurial development, exploration, exploitation, and deployment actions, reactions and interactions. In this context, our paper aims to explore and profile the nature and dynamics of the Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation System Model or Framework (government, university, industry, civil society, environment) as an enabler and enactor of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems which we conceptualize as fractal, multi‐level, multi‐modal, multi‐nodal, and multi‐lateral configurations of dynamic tangible and intangible assets within the resource‐based view and the new theory of the growth of the firm. Co‐opetitive fractal innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystems are defined and discussed, and examples of regional innovation policies and programs are presented. Furthermore, the concept of multi‐level innovation systems is analyzed, taking into account the existence of knowledge clusters and innovation networks, while alternative aggregations of multi‐level innovation systems are proposed based on their spatial (geographical) and non‐spatial (research‐based) functional properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · Cited by 18,010
The Knowledge-Creating Company
Nonaka, I. (1998) · The Economic Impact of Knowledge · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1 · Cited by 14,619
The theory of the growth of the firm
Penrose, E. (1996) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90295-2 · Cited by 13,770
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2276 · Cited by 6,488
National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning
(2010) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.7135/upo9781843318903 · Cited by 6,032
Cited by
Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach
Theodoraki, C., Dana, L.-P., & Caputo, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.005 · Cited by 297
Spatial features of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Fischer, B., Meissner, D., Vonortas, N., & Guerrero, M. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.018 · Cited by 106
Self-citationChaudhary, S., Kaur, P., Alofaysan, H., Halberstadt, J., & Dhir, A. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3466 · Cited by 86
Social Entrepreneurship and Social Capital: A Review of Impact Research
Daskalopoulou, I., Karakitsiou, A., & Thomakis, Z. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15064787 · Cited by 66
Connecting entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation. Grasping at straws or hitting a home run?
Chaudhary, S., Kaur, P., Ferraris, A., Bresciani, S., & Dhir, A. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102942 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-162
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W2766926953
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 39.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/radm.12300
- The paper
- Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.