Cited by 96Asthma and respiratory diseasesRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Novel assessment tool to detect breathing pattern disorder in patients with refractory asthma

Todd, Sarah, Walsted, Emil S., Grillo, Lizzie, Livingston, Rebecca, Menzies‐Gow, Andrew, Hull, James H.·2018·Respirology

Abstract

Background and objective: Breathing pattern disorder (BPD) can co‐exist with and mimic asthma, acting to amplify symptoms and confound assessment of disease control, resulting in inappropriate treatment escalation. The aim of this research was to report the utility of a novel breathing pattern assessment tool (BPAT) to detect BPD in treatment‐refractory asthma. Methods: As a component of a multidisciplinary assessment, adult patients referred with treatment‐refractory asthma underwent respiratory physiotherapy assessment to diagnose BPD. Based on this assessment, patients were classified as having asthma, asthma + BPD or BPD alone. BPAT data were collected in addition to questionnaire data (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ)), pulmonary function and an assessment of exercise capacity. Results: Data were retrospectively analysed for 150 (female; 69%) patients, mean (SD) age of 43 (14) years; characterized as asthma‐only (n = 54, 36%), asthma + BPD (n = 63, 42%) and BPD‐only (n = 33, 22%). Of the total population, 113 (76%) had an NQ score ≥23, but of these only 68% had physiotherapy evidence of BPD. Exercise capacity and AQLQ were lower in the asthma + BPD group than in the asthma‐only group (P < 0.05), whilst lung function was similar between groups. Sensitivity analysis indicated that a BPAT score of ≥4 corresponded to a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.75 for diagnosis of BPD in this cohort. Conclusion: Breathing pattern irregularities are highly prevalent in individuals referred with treatment‐refractory asthma and can be characterized using the BPAT. Further work is needed to determine inter‐observer and within‐subject variability and ensure the BPAT is a robust clinical tool. Watch the video abstract

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/resp.13173

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Objective assessment tools lack sufficient evidence (BH and BPAT) or are perceived to be too complex for general use (Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion).

    “Objective assessment tools lack sufficient evidence (BH 31 and BPAT 14 ) or are perceived to be too complex for general use (Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion 32 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Todd, S., Walsted, E. S., Grillo, L., Livingston, R., Menzies‐Gow, A., & Hull, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
  • Department of Respiratory Medicine Royal Brompton Hospital London UK
Corresponding author
Hull, James H.
Venue
Respirology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-14
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
284-290
ISSN
  • 1323-7799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1843
OpenAlex
W2755877069
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respirology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
breathing pattern disorders, refractory asthma, respiratory physiotherapy, Nijmegen questionnaire, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, exercise capacity, lung function, asthma diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Asthma, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiration Disorders, Respiratory Function Tests, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review