Cited by 25Climate Change and Health ImpactsHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

A Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Improving Short-Term Forecasting of Hospital Demand by Including Meteorological Information

Sahu, Sujit K., Baffour, Bernard, Harper, Paul R., Minty, John H., Sarran, Christophe·2014·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society

Abstract

Summary: The effect of weather on health has been widely researched, and the ability to forecast meteorological events can offer valuable insights into the effect on public health services. In addition, better predictions of hospital demand that are more sensitive to fluctuations in weather can allow hospital administrators to optimize resource allocation and service delivery. Using historical hospital admission data and several seasonal and meteorological variables for a site near the hospital, the paper develops a novel Bayesian model for short-term prediction of the numbers of admissions categorized by several factors such as age group and sex. The model proposed is extended by incorporating the inherent uncertainty in the meteorological forecasts into the predictions for the number of admissions. The methods are illustrated with admissions data obtained from two moderately large hospital trusts in Cardiff and Southampton, in the UK, each admitting about 30000–50000 non-elective patients every year. The Bayesian model, computed by using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, is shown to produce more accurate predictions of the number of hospital admissions than those obtained by using a 6-week moving average method which is similar to that widely used by hospital managers. The gains are shown to be substantial during periods of rapid temperature changes, typically during the onset of cold and highly variable winter weather.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/rssa.12008

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahu, S. K., Baffour, B., Harper, P. R., Minty, J. H., & Sarran, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Met Office (GB)
Corresponding author
Sahu, Sujit K.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
Published
2013-04-23
Volume
177
Issue
1
Pages
39-61
ISSN
  • 0964-1998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-985X
OpenAlex
W2047452988
Cited by
25
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Southampton
  • Met Office
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H010637/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
hospital demand forecasting, hospitalization, weather effects on health, Bayesian hierarchical model, short-term forecasting, temperature change, winter weather, hospital resource allocation, age and sex stratification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review