The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Rethinking: a Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan
Abstract
This is an exceptional book. The author is very clear that this book has been written as a course and is not suitable for ‘random access’. It is aimed at researchers in natural and social scientists from doctoral students onwards, but it contains such a depth of understanding and exposition of the principles and practice of statistical modelling that it deserves to be read carefully by a much wider audience even if it must be read from cover to cover. Strengths of the book include this clear conceptual exposition of statistical thinking as well as the focus on applying the material to real phenomena. The author makes plentiful use of thought-provoking metaphors ranging from the ‘statistical Golems’ in Chapter 1 through to a very accessible explanation of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods thanks to planning ‘Good King Markov's’ visits to different islands in his kingdom in Chapter 8. The first three chapters set out a framework for understanding and investigating statistical models and the way that they are intended to represent natural or social phenomena. Chapters 4 and 5 cover first simple and then multiple linear regression with interactions covered in Chapter 7. Chapter 5 contains a particularly succinct and finely polished overview of multiple regression tackling subjects such as multicollinearity in a thoughtful way. It does not just address the technical issues but also deals with often neglected or downplayed interpretative problems that arise in this context. Omitted variables and post-treatment bias are covered in the same chapter. Overfitting is a core theme developed throughout the book, mentioned right at the start, but then a whole chapter (Chapter 6) is devoted to overfitting as well as regularization and information criteria. Regularization is particularly well explained especially (in my opinion) in relation to multilevel models. As noted Chapter 8 provides an overview of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods with considerable insight into some problems that can occur (such as problems emerging from using flat priors used with variance parameters). Chapters 9–14 then provide an overview of a wide range of practically important methods ranging from standard generalized linear models through to mixtures, multilevel models and handling missing data. The book does provide a fair degree of the mathematical theory and introduces topics such as entropy which are not always covered in this context. It does not claim to be a definitive formal mathematical text. It relies heavily on computer exploration to engage the reader with the key issues whether these concern concepts, interpreting phenomena or understanding methodology. For that it is supported by a very thorough and well-constructed R package ‘rethinking’ which facilitates carefully designed access to the Stan package (Carpenter et al., 2016). Effort has gone into selecting interesting data sets both for examples and for end-of-chapter exercises. The book contains a good selection of extension activities labelled according to difficulty. The book itself contains optional paragraphs labelled ‘rethinking’ or ‘overthinking’, indicating either further material or fine details. I would unreservedly recommend this book to a wide audience interested in the principles of modern statistical modelling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v076.i01 · Cited by 7,754
Cited by
Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial
Bürkner, P.-C., & Vuorre, M. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918823199 · Cited by 689
Bowles, T. M., Mooshammer, M., Socolar, Y., Calderón, F., Cavigelli, M. A., Culman, S. W., Deen, W., Drury, C. F., Garcia y Garcia, A., Gaudin, A. C. M., et al. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.007 · Cited by 526
Bayesian Benefits for the Pragmatic Researcher
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Morey, R. D., & Lee, M. D. (2016) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416643289 · Cited by 334
Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists
Gervais, W. M., Xygalatas, D., McKay, R. T., van Elk, M., Buchtel, E. E., Aveyard, M., Schiavone, S. R., Dar-Nimrod, I., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., Riekki, T., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0151 · Cited by 292
Modelling monotonic effects of ordinal predictors in Bayesian regression models
Bürkner, P., & Charpentier, E. (2020) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12195 · Cited by 160
Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study
Jäger, L. A., Mertzen, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Vasishth, S. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.104063 · Cited by 142
Hypothetical Outcome Plots Help Untrained Observers Judge Trends in Ambiguous Data
Kale, A., Nguyen, F., Kay, M., & Hullman, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864909 · Cited by 122
Steel, Z. L., Koontz, M. J., & Safford, H. D. (2018) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-018-0665-5 · Cited by 100
Making 'Null Effects' Informative: Statistical Techniques and Inferential Frameworks
Harms, C., & Lakens, D. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/48zca · Cited by 99
A Bayesian Cognition Approach to Improve Data Visualization
Kim, Y.-S., Walls, L. A., Krafft, P., & Hullman, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300912 · Cited by 76
Noonan, J., Asiala, S. M., Grassia, G., MacRitchie, N., Gracie, K., Carson, J., Moores, M., Girolami, M., Bradshaw, A. C., Guzik, T. J., et al. (2018) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.28665 · Cited by 69
Hullman, J., Kay, M., Kim, Y.-S., & Shrestha, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2017.2743898 · Cited by 55
Abramovitch (2019) · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.09.001 · Cited by 59
Understanding the keystroke log: the effect of writing task on keystroke features
Conijn, R., Roeser, J., & van Zaanen, M. (2019) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-019-09953-8 · Cited by 55
Bayesian Data Analysis in Empirical Software Engineering Research
Furia, C. A., Feldt, R., & Torkar, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2019.2935974 · Cited by 42
Ren, L., Kutaka, T. S., Chernyavskiy, P., Fan, J., & Li, X. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101845 · Cited by 41
Wartel, A., Lindenfors, P., & Lind, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218655 · Cited by 40
Helske, J., Helske, S., Cooper, M., Ynnerman, A., & Besancon, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3073466 · Cited by 38
Radically open dialectical behaviour therapy for refractory depression: the RefraMED RCT
Lynch, T. R., Hempel, R. J., Whalley, B., Byford, S., Chamba, R., Clarke, P., Clarke, S., Kingdon, D., O’Mahen, H., Remington, B., et al. (2018) · Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation · doi:10.3310/eme05070 · Cited by 22
Gervais, W. M., & Najle, M. B. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/edzda · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewson, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-09-28
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1131-1132
- ISSN
- 0964-1998 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-985X
- OpenAlex
- W2525726046
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 115.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.