Cited by 68Markov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsTheoretical and Computational PhysicsSimulation Techniques and Applications

Non-Reversible Parallel Tempering: A Scalable Highly Parallel MCMC Scheme

Open access
Syed, Saifuddin, Bouchard-Côté, Alexandre, Deligiannidis, George, Doucet, Arnaud·2022·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Parallel tempering (PT) methods are a popular class of Markov chain Monte Carlo schemes used to sample complex high-dimensional probability distributions. They rely on a collection of N interacting auxiliary chains targeting tempered versions of the target distribution to improve the exploration of the state space. We provide here a new perspective on these highly parallel algorithms and their tuning by identifying and formalizing a sharp divide in the behaviour and performance of reversible versus non-reversible PT schemes. We show theoretically and empirically that a class of non-reversible PT methods dominates its reversible counterparts and identify distinct scaling limits for the non-reversible and reversible schemes, the former being a piecewise-deterministic Markov process and the latter a diffusion. These results are exploited to identify the optimal annealing schedule for non-reversible PT and to develop an iterative scheme approximating this schedule. We provide a wide range of numerical examples supporting our theoretical and methodological contributions. The proposed methodology is applicable to sample from a distribution π with a density L with respect to a reference distribution π0 and compute the normalizing constant ∫Ldπ0. A typical use case is when π0 is a prior distribution, L a likelihood function and π the corresponding posterior distribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/rssb.12464

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Syed, S., Bouchard-Côté, A., Deligiannidis, G., & Doucet, A.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia , Canada
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Oxford , Oxford, Oxfordshire , UK
Corresponding author
Syed, Saifuddin
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
2021-12-03
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
321-350
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W2977245197
Cited by
68
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R034710/1, EP/R018561/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
parallel tempering, non-reversible Markov chains, reversible Markov chains, Markov chain Monte Carlo, annealing schedule, piecewise deterministic Markov processes, diffusion approximation, scaling limits, posterior sampling, high-dimensional sampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review