Cited by 25Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesInjury Epidemiology and PreventionHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Preventing suicide at suicide hotspots: a case study from Australia

Open access
Lockley, Anne, Cheung, Yee Tak Derek, Cox, Georgina, Robinson, Jo, Williamson, Michelle, Harris, Meredith, Machlin, Anna, Moffat, Caitlin +1 more·2014·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

The Gap Park Self‐Harm Minimisation Masterplan project is a collaborative attempt to address jumping suicides at Sydney's Gap Park through means restriction, encouraging help‐seeking, and increasing the likelihood of third‐party intervention. We used various data sources to describe the Masterplan project's processes, impacts, and outcomes. There have been reductions in reported jumps and confirmed suicides, although the trends are not statistically significant. There has been a significant increase in police call‐outs to intervene with suicidal people who have not yet reached the cliff's edge. The collaborative nature of the Masterplan project and its multifaceted approach appear to be reaping benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12080

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]17. Ross, T., & Lester, D. (1991). Suicide at Niagara Falls. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1677- 1678.
  2. [26]26. Lockley, A., Cheung, Y. T. D., Cox, G., Robinson, J., Williamson, M., Harris, M., Machlin, A., Moffat, C. & Pirkis, J. (2014). Preventing Suicide at Suicide Hotspots: A Case Study from Australia. SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 44 (4), pp.392-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12080. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/58455 File Description: Accepted version

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lockley, A., Cheung, Y. T. D., Cox, G., Robinson, J., Williamson, M., Harris, M., Machlin, A., Moffat, C., & Pirkis, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Woollahra Municipal Council Sydney NSW Australia
Corresponding author
Pirkis, Jane
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-15
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
392-407
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2039972604
Cited by
25
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide prevention, suicide hotspots, means restriction, self-harm, help-seeking, third-party intervention, police intervention, Sydney
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Australia, Humans, Suicide, Program Evaluation, Police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review