Cited by 58Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesInjury Epidemiology and PreventionHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Preventing suicide by jumping: the effect of a bridge safety fence

Open access
Pelletier, Andrew R·2007·Injury Prevention

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a bridge safety fence in preventing suicide. Methods: We examined suicides from jumping off the Memorial Bridge in Augusta, Maine, from 1 April 1960 to 31 July 2005. The safety fence was installed during 1983, the mid-point of the study period. Results: 14 suicides from the bridge were identified; all occurred before installation of the safety fence. The number of suicides by jumping from other structures remained unchanged after installation of the fence. Conclusion: The safety fence was effective in preventing suicides from the bridge. There was no evidence that suicidal individuals sought alternative sites for jumping.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ip.2006.013748

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The construction of barriers and fencing at high-risk jumping sites, especially bridges, can lead to a reduction in the number of suicides by this method.

    “A range of studies have demonstrated that the construction of barriers and fencing at high-risk jumping sites, especially bridges, can lead to a reduction in the number of suicides by this method (Beautrais 2001;Bennewith 2007;Pelletier 2007;Pirkis 2013;Pirkis 2015).”

    From Means restriction for the prevention of suicide by jumping (2020) · cites this paper as Pelletier 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]8. Gunnell D, Nowers M, Bennewith O. Suicide by jumping: is prevention possible? Suicidologi 2005;10:15-17.
  2. [10]10. Friend T. Jumpers: the fatal grandeur of the Golden Gate Bridge. New Yorker 2003;79:48-59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pelletier, A. R.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Pelletier, Andrew R
Venue
Injury Prevention
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
57-59
ISSN
  • 1353-8047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-5785
OpenAlex
W2125087645
Cited by
58
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • U.S. Department of Transportation
  • Maine Department of Transportation
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide prevention, memorial bridges, Augusta, Maine, fence installation
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Architectural Accessibility, Humans, Maine, Suicide, Attempted, Safety Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review