Cited by 40Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbusePoisoning and overdose treatments

Suicidal Intent and Method of Self‐Harm: A Large‐scale Study of Self‐Harm Patients Presenting to a General Hospital

Haw, Camilla, Casey, Deborah, Holmes, Jane, Hawton, Keith·2015·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

Data from the Oxford Monitoring System for Attempted Suicide (2004–2011) were used to study hospital presentations for self‐harm in which Suicidal Intent Scale (SIS) scores were obtained (N = 4,840). Regression of medians was used to control for the confounding effect of age and gender. Higher estimated median SIS scores were associated with increasing age, male gender, self‐poisoning versus self‐injury, multiple methods of self‐harm versus self‐injury alone, use of gas (mainly carbon monoxide), dangerous methods of self‐injury (including hanging, gunshot), and use of alcohol as part of the act. For self‐poisoning patients, there was a correlation between the number of tablets taken and the total SIS score. Compared with self‐poisoning with paracetamol and paracetamol‐containing compounds, self‐poisoning with antipsychotics was associated with a lower median SIS score while antidepressants had the same estimated median as paracetamol. Use of alcohol within 6 hours of self‐harm was associated with lower SIS scores. In conclusion, certain methods of self‐harm, particularly dangerous methods of self‐injury and self‐poisoning with gas, were associated with high intent and should alert clinicians to potential higher risk of suicide. However, apart from use of gas, suicidal intent cannot be inferred from type of drugs used for self‐poisoning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12168

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haw, C., Casey, D., Holmes, J., & Hawton, K.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
732-746
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W1973098346
Cited by
40
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
Keywords
suicidal intent, self-harm, self-poisoning, carbon monoxide poisoning, hanging, gunshots, alcohol consumption, paracetamol, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, suicide risk assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Dangerous Behavior, Female, United Kingdom, Hospitalization, Hospitals, General, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Self-Injurious Behavior, Risk Assessment, Intention, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review