Cited by 88Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Medically serious versus non-serious suicide attempts: Relationships of lethality and intent to clinical and interpersonal characteristics

Horesh, Netta, Levi, Yossi, Apter, Alan·2012·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The study of near-fatal suicide attempts may provide insight into the minds of suicidal subjects. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship of intent and lethality in medically serious and medically non-serious suicide attempts and to examine relationship of specific psychological and clinical variables with the subjective and objective components of suicide intent.Methods The study group included 102 participants, 35 consecutive subjects hospitalized for a medically serious suicide attempt and 67 subjects who presented to the same tertiary medical center after a medically non-serious suicide attempt. All were interviewed with the SCID-I and completed the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS), the Lethality Rating Scale, and instruments measuring mental pain and communication difficulties.Results Patients who made medically serious suicide attempts had higher total SIS score and higher objective and subjective subscale scores. The objective component of the SIS was highly correlated with the lethality of the suicide attempt and communication difficulties; the subjective component was associated with mental pain variables. The interaction of mental pain and communication difficulties was predictive of the severity of the objective suicide intent.Limitations Relatively small number of patients with medically serious suicide attempt and the relatively large number of questionnaires which may to some extent have diminished informant reliability.Conclusions Suicidal individuals with depression and hopelessness who cannot signal their pain to others are at high risk of committing a medically serious suicide attempts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.035

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horesh, N., Levi, Y., & Apter, A.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Ruppin Academic Center (IL)
  • Schneider Children's Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Levi, Yossi
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
136
Issue
3
Pages
286-293
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089241697
Cited by
88
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
suicide attempts, suicidal intent, lethality, Suicide Intent Scale, psychological suffering, communication difficulties, hopelessness, depression, suicide risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Suicide, Attempted, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review