The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acute effect of Snus on physical performance and perceived cognitive load on amateur footballers
Abstract
Smokeless tobacco (S nus) is a substance that contains nicotine, which has been placed on W orld A nti‐D oping A gency's 2014 Monitoring Program. A proliferation of nicotine use in sport has been observed in recent years, but little is known regarding its effects, especially on football players' performance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of S nus on physical performance, heart rate variability, subjective activation, mental fatigue, and perceived readiness before a physical test in non‐smoker, non‐S nus user, amateur football players. Participants were administered either S nus or placebo 40 min prior to a fitness test battery (handgrip test, countermovement jump, agility test, and Yo‐Yo intermittent recovery test). Results showed that S nus intake (compared with placebo) increased perceived mental fatigue level and mental load, and reduced perceived readiness level and heart rate variability. No significant differences between the two experimental conditions were found in either performance in the physical tests or perceived physical fatigue levels. In light of these results, S nus could not be considered an ergogenic substance. On the contrary, based on the extant evidence linking mental load and fatigue with physical performance, we argue that the observed negative effects on mental fatigue, perceived readiness, and heart rate variability should be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of the four studies that assessed high-intensity and intermittent sprint exercise, only one demonstrated an ergogenic effect with nicotine [47] whilst the other three demonstrated no change [3, 45, 53].”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“reported that snus use did not affect either performance measure.”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“Of the three studies that assessed muscular strength and power, one showed an ergogenic effect with nicotine [47], one an ergolytic effect [21] and another no change [45].”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“Only five of the performance studies report data on side effects [22, 45–47, 62]; all used nicotine-naïve participants who reported either minor (occasional coughing/sneezing, scratchy/tickly throat) or major (tachycardia, nausea, dizziness, etc.) adverse events that even led to participants suspending trials.”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“Morente-Sánchez et al. [45] used maximum agility and progressive shuttle running tests following 40 min snus or placebo use in amateur footballers who were not habitual tobacco users, and reported that snus use did not affect either performance test.”
From Nicotine: Sporting Friend or Foe? A Review of Athlete Use, Performance Consequences and Other Considerations (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lunell, E., & Lunell, M. (2005) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200500125468 · Cited by 69
Effect of transdermal nicotine administration on exercise endurance in men
Mündel, T., & Jones, D. A. (2006) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2006.033373 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00636.x · DOI
- Borg G, 1998, Perceived exertion and pain scales
- 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-P · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.018 · DOI
- 10.1093/eurpub/ckt086 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00213-010-1848-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90041-N · DOI
- 10.1177/0003319706294555 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00237.x · DOI
- 10.2165/11586080-000000000-00000 · DOI
- 10.1093/ntr/ntr044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02441642 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.91324.2008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01505.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2458-12-230 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hup.488 · DOI
- 10.1093/ntr/ntt275 · DOI
- Mundel T, 2012, Oral nicotine administration affects muscular force and anaerobic performance but not vertical power, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 44, 810
- 10.1249/00005768-198315060-00015 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2458-11-929 · DOI
- 10.2466/pms.2001.93.2.397 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-2913-9_21 · DOI
- 10.1186/1743-7075-10-71 · DOI
- 10.1080/02640410400021245 · DOI
- 10.1111/idh.12065 · DOI
- 10.1109/10.979357 · DOI
- 10.1016/0954-6111(93)90068-B · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1249/00005768-199203000-00016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/14622299050011501 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00558134 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.04.002 · DOI
- Zabala M, 2012, Looking for the “athlete 2.0”: a collaborative challenge, J Sci Cycling, 1, 1
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.11.016 · DOI
Cited by
Mündel, T. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0764-5 · Cited by 71
Johnston, R., Doma, K., & Crowe, M. (2018) · Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging · doi:10.1111/cpf.12443 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Morente‐Sánchez, J., Zandonai, T., Mateo‐March, M., Sanabria, D., Sánchez‐Muñoz, C., Chiamulera, C., & Zabala Díaz, M.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0905-7188
- 1600-0838
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
