Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 123

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple factors explain injury risk in adolescent elite athletes: Applying a biopsychosocial perspective

von Rosen, P., Frohm, A., Kottorp, A., Fridén, C., Heijne, A.·2017·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

Many risk factors for injury are presented in the literature, few of those are however consistent and the majority is associated with adult and not adolescent elite athletes. The aim was to identify risk factors for injury in adolescent elite athletes, by applying a biopsychosocial approach. A total of 496 adolescent elite athletes (age range 15‐19), participating in 16 different sports, were monitored repeatedly over 52 weeks using a valid questionnaire about injuries, training exposure, sleep, stress, nutrition, and competence‐based self‐esteem. Univariate and multiple Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for risk factors for first reported injury. The main finding was that an increase in training load, training intensity, and at the same time decreasing the sleep volume resulted in a higher risk for injury compared to no change in these variables (HR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.46‐3.45, P <.01), which was the strongest risk factor identified. In addition, an increase by one score of competence‐based self‐esteem increased the hazard for injury with 1.02 (HR 95% CI, 1.00‐1.04, P =.01). Based on the multiple Cox regression analysis, an athlete having the identified risk factors (Risk Index, competence‐based self‐esteem), with an average competence‐based self‐esteem score, had more than a threefold increased risk for injury (HR 3.35), compared to an athlete with a low competence‐based self‐esteem and no change in sleep or training volume. Our findings confirm injury occurrence as a result of multiple risk factors interacting in complex ways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.12855

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

2 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093299 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1097/01.jsm.0000248845.39498.56 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3180592a48 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/bjsm.37.5.384 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1136/bjsm.2010.073833 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091651 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/02640410310001641638 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094817 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/sms.12735 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092087 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kecklund G, 1992, The psychometric properties of the Karolinska sleep questionnaire, J Sleep Res, 1, 113
  13. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Johnson M, 2007, Development and validation of two measures of contingent self‐esteem, Individ Differ Res, 5, 300
  15. 10.2519/jospt.2016.6510 · DOI
  16. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181eb9d4d · DOI
  17. 10.1123/jsr.22.1.19 · DOI
  18. 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.353 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000151 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/sbr.12024 · DOI
  21. Eklund M, 2014, Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Swedish version of the Perceived Stress Scale, Psychiatry, 68, 494
  22. 10.1111/sjop.12071 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/9780470316696 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01856.x · DOI
  25. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<681::AID-SIM71>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601120 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2165/00007256-199826010-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00399.x · DOI
  29. 10.1080/17461391.2012.740504 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Mendonza M, 2007, Influences of psychological factors and rehabilitation adherence on the outcome post anterior cruciate ligament injury/surgical reconstruction, NZ J Physiother, 35, 62
  31. 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00092-7 · DOI
  32. 10.2165/11536890-000000000-00000 · DOI
  33. 10.1123/ijsnem.21.3.248 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Gunnoe AJ, 2001, The effect of life events on incidence of injury in high school football players, J Athl Train, 36, 150

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
von Rosen, P., Frohm, A., Kottorp, A., Fridén, C., & Heijne, A.
Affiliations
Division of Physiotherapy Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society (NVS) Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
2059-2069
ISSN
  • 0905-7188
  • 1600-0838
Cited by
123
References
5
Language
en
Funders
Centrum for Idrottsforskning (FO2016‐0009)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.