Men, masculinities, and gender‐based violence: The broadening scope of recent research
Abstract
Men's relationships to gender‐based violence (GBV) have long been an area of sociological inquiry, but until recently men have primarily been framed as perpetrators of violence against women. More recently, research on men and GBV has broadened to include studying men as victims/survivors, as investigators and law enforcement officers, as passive or active bystanders, and as allies in working to address this social problem. We review this research in an effort to bridge these divergent bodies of work; we identify methodological trends and gaps in existing research, make recommendations for improved theoretical and methodological robustness, and suggest that research perspectives on men and GBV have shifted over time as wider understandings of gender and masculinities become more hopeful and more inclusive. While we see optimism and promise in new directions of GBV research, we urge ongoing research to retain the wisdoms and critical perspectives that marked the beginnings of GBV inquiry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The connection between normative and harmful masculinities and various forms of gender-based and sexual violence is well established in decades of literature.
“The connection between normative and harmful masculinities and various forms of genderbased and sexual violence is well established in decades of literature (e.g.Peretz and Vidmar 2021).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Peretz and Vidmar 2021
Acts of harassment or violence can be celebrated as markers of masculinity within peer groups.
“This statement reflects the social currency of dominance within peer groups, where acts of harassment or violence can be celebrated as markers of masculinity (Peretz and Vidmar 2021).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Peretz and Vidmar 2021
Cites
Education Groups for Men Who Batter
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993) · doi:10.1891/9780826179913 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Male Sexual Victimization: Examining Men’s Experiences of Rape and Sexual Assault
Weiss, K. G. (2010) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x08322632 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
From 'real rape' to real justice: A systematic review of police officers' rape myth beliefs
Parratt, K. A., & Pina, A. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.03.005 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almanssori, S., Paskaran, L., & Mendes, K. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2025.2531789 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The connection between normative and harmful masculinities and various forms of gender-based and sexual violence is well established in decades of literature (e.g. Peretz and Vidmar 2021).”
- Authors
- Peretz, T., & Vidmar, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- Georgia State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peretz, Tal
- Venue
- Sociology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-02-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3131470873
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- gender-based violence, masculinity, men, male victims, law enforcement, bystanders, allies, violence against women, research gaps, methodological trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review