The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“I Will Be Out There Every Day Strong!” Protest Policing and Future Activism Among Ferguson and Baltimore Protesters
Abstract
An established body of literature shows that people engage in protest events for a number of reasons, including grievances, collective identity, increased efficacy, and emotions. However, it is unclear what happens to individuals’ motivation toward protest participation as they experience the reality of repressive policing. This study contributes to the theoretical body of knowledge of protest policing and social movements by investigating the microlevel processes that affect protest participation. Specifically, we build from the insights of previous research by examining how 102 Ferguson and Baltimore protesters with varying levels of commitment—revolutionary, intermittent, tourist—experienced repressive policing and how such tactics affected their subsequent decision to engage in future activism. Our findings suggest that those with the strongest commitment toward protest goals experienced the most repressive tactics, and yet did not seem to be deterred in their motivation to be engaged in future protests. In contrast, while repressive tactics appeared to deter the less committed individuals from street protests, they remained motivated to engage in other forms of civic engagement.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“BLM activists strategically organize to protect themselves from police violence (Cobbina et al. 2019; Haimson 2020)”
From WHEN BLACK MOVEMENTS MATTER: CONTROLLING IMAGES AND BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS IN MEDIA ATTENTION TO U.S. POLICE KILLINGS (2024) · cites this paper as Cobbina et al. 2019
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
The social psychology of protest
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113479314 · Cited by 740
Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210399 · Cited by 722 · cited 2×
“Scholars have identified numerous factors that play a role in the initiation and escalation of protest events (see Van Stekelenburg and Klandermans 2013) by examining the macrocontext in which social movement organizations are embedded (Cress and Snow 2000).”
BackgroundGau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820902763889 · Cited by 582
Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control
Earl, J. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102609 · Cited by 445
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), 2014, War Comes Home: The Excessive Militarization of American Policing
- Baltimore City Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge #3, 2015, After‐Action Review: A Review of the Management of the 2015 Baltimore Riots
- 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 · DOI · Paper page
- Barajas Joshua, 2015, Freddie Gray's Death Ruled a Homicide, PBS Newshour
- Boykoff Jules, 2006, The Suppression of Dissent: How the State and Mass Media Squelch US American Social Movements
- 10.1080/14742837.2015.1037261 · DOI
- 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
- Coyne Christopher J., 2016, Foreign Intervention, Police Militarization, and Minorities, Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 28, 165, 10.1080/10402659.2016.1166739 · DOI
- Dansky Kara, 2016, Local Democratic Oversight of Police Militarization, Harvard Law & Policy Review, 10, 59
- 10.1177/0003122410395370 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470999103.ch10 · DOI
- 10.2307/1519740 · DOI
- 10.2307/2080213 · DOI
- Gillham Patrick, 2007, More than a March in a Circle’: Transgressive Protests and the Limits of Negotiated Management, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12, 341, 10.17813/maiq.12.4.j10822802t7n0t34 · DOI
- 10.2307/2095630 · DOI
- 10.1177/0896920515589724 · DOI
- Institute for Intergovernmental Research, 2015, After‐Action Assessment of the Police Response to the August 2014 Demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri. COPS Office Critical Response Initiative
- 10.1177/1754073914522863 · DOI
- King Mike, 2017, When Riot Cops Are Not Enough: The Policing and Repression of Occupy Oakland
- Klandermans Bert, 1997, The Social Psychology of Protest
- Klandermans Bert, 2000, Self, Identity, and Social Movements, 68
- Link Jonathan, 2015, Recommendations for Enhancing Baltimore City's Preparedness and Response to Mass Demonstration Events: Based on a Review and Analysis of the Events of April 2015
- Lowery Wesley, 2016, They Can't Kill Us All: Ferguson, Baltimore, and a New Era in America's Racial Justice Movement
- Musgrave Shawn, 2014, The Pentagon Finally Details Its Weapons‐for‐Cops Giveaway, The Marshall Project
- Noakes John, 2006, The Policing of Transnational Protest, 97
- 10.1093/sf/69.2.521 · DOI
- 10.1111/socf.12380 · DOI
- Police Executive Research Forum, 2015, Lessons Learned From the 2015 Civil Unrest in Baltimore
- 10.1017/CBO9780511557842 · DOI · Paper page
- Sullivan Christopher, 2011, Police Will Repress—But Will It Demobilize?, Mobilizing Ideas
- 10.1177/1098611102250584 · DOI
- Tyler Tom R., 2008, Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities?, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231
- Van Stekelenburg Jacqueline, 2007, Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines, 157
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649 · DOI · Paper page
- Zwerman Gilda, 2005, Repression and Mobilization, 85
Cited by
Lu, T. (2024) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/1086-671x-29-1-19 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Cobbina, J. E., Chaudhuri, S., Rios, V. M., & Conteh, M.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cobbina, Jennifer E.
- Chaudhuri, Soma
- Rios, Victor M.
- Conteh, Michael
- Venue
- Sociological Forum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-18
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 409-433
- ISSN
- 0884-8971 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7861
- OpenAlex
- W2924650383
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 23.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociological Forum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- protest policing, repressive policing, protest participation, Ferguson protests, police tactics, revolutionary commitment, deterrence, citizen participation, social movements, Black Lives Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review