Cited by 164Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Morality in Groups: On the Social‐Regulatory Functions of Right and Wrong

Ellemers, Naomi, van den Bos, Kees·2012·Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Abstract

Applying what we know about group‐based identities and concerns allows us to improve our understanding of the ways in which morality is relevant to social judgments of right and wrong. We distinguish between three different social functions of moral standards and moral judgments. The identity defining function of morality indicates where people want to belong, and how they are regarded by others. The group dynamic function indicates consensual definitions of what is right and wrong that guide individual behavioral choices. The intergroup relations function of group morality, speaks to the way people tend to communicate with and behave towards members of other groups that have different moral standards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/spc3.12001

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechanisms of social enforcement encourage people to embrace and internalize shared guidelines, making them motivated to do what is considered right while avoiding behaviours that seem wrong, and do not rely on legal agreements and formal sanctions.

    “These mechanisms of social enforcement encourage people to embrace and internalize shared guidelines, making them motivated to do what is considered right while avoiding behaviours that seem wrong 164 , and do not rely on legal agreements and formal sanctions 165 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellemers, N., & van den Bos, K.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
878-889
ISSN
1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1594248649
Cited by
164
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
18.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social and Personality Psychology Compass (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
moral judgment, social regulation, group identity, social belonging, intergroup relations, moral norms, social norms, group dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review