Cited by 317Heavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

A review of green remediation strategies for heavy metal contaminated soil

Open access
Wang, Liuwei, Rinklebe, Jörg, Tack, Filip M. G., Hou, Deyi·2021·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Heavy metals and metalloids can accumulate in soil, with potentially toxic effects to human health and ecosystems, threatening the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Although a number of remediation technologies, such as Solidification/Stabilization (S/S), soil washing, electrokinetic remediation and chemical oxidation/reduction can be applied for the immobilization, removal or detoxification of heavy metals in soil, the environmental, social and economic impacts associated with these conventional approaches hinder their overall sustainability. More attempts have been made to maximize the ‘net environmental benefit’ in various ways, including recovering resources, embracing nature‐based solutions (NBS), and saving energy with the emergence and development of the ‘green and sustainable remediation’ (GSR) movement. This review critically discusses these green remediation strategies, and the novel soil amendments being utilized in these sustainable approaches. Iron‐based amendments are the most promising candidates in green remediation due to the highest stabilization performances for both oxyanions and metallic cations as well as relatively low disturbance to soil. In comparison, waste‐derived materials suffer from risks of contaminant release in the long run, reducing the overall sustainability despite their low costs. It has been found that phytoremediation and green amendment‐based S/S are typically the ‘greenest’ remediation strategies, but wise decisions should be made on the basis of case‐specific sustainability assessment results. Finally, it is proposed that integration of several green remediation techniques may have a synergistic effect on remediation efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sum.12717

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High ash biochars favor metal immobilization.

    “High ash biochars favor metal immobilization due to enhanced precipitation (Wang et al. 2021b), whereas low ash biochars favor organic contaminant retention due to enhanced hydrophobic interactions (Dai et  al. 2019).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2021b

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Rinklebe, J., Tack, F. M. G., & Hou, D.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Hou, Deyi
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-16
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
936-963
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W3133828512
Cited by
317
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 15
FWCI
11.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077118)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
heavy metal-contaminated soil, green remediation, sustainable remediation, solidification/stabilization, nature-based solutions, phytoremediation, electrokinetic remediation, soil washing, metal immobilization, metalloids, sustainability assessment, integrated remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review